Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 318-343 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Jun 2021 |
Abstract
Introduction: Digital mental health interventions are on the rise; yet people with intellectual disabilities are not generally seen as their potential users. This study aims to explore the accessability of two mainstream online mood-management programmes. Methods: Using a qualitative study design, 12 adults with intellectual disabilities were interviewed while accessing moodgym and iFightDepression®. Thematic analysis was used to explore the programs’ accessibility according to the technology acceptance model. Results: The programs’ ease-of-use was considered in terms of visual appeal, support needs, and essential skills for independent program use. Perceived usefulness concerned participants’ understanding of the purpose and expected personal benefits associated with the interventions. Finally, intention to use and motivation to interact with the interventions were key aspects of participants’ attititudes toward them. Conclusion: Improving intervention accessibility is a first important step to ensure people with intellectual disabilities can understand the purpose and content of digital mental health interventions.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Psychology(all)
- Psychology (miscellaneous)
Research Area (based on ÖFOS 2012)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- Psychology
- Psychology
- Educational psychology
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- Educational Sciences
- Educational Sciences
- Orthopaedagogy
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- Educational Sciences
- Educational Sciences
- Inclusive education
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 14, No. 3, 21.06.2021, p. 318-343.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Digital Mental Health Interventions: A Qualitative Exploration with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
AU - Vereenooghe, Leen
AU - Trussat, Felix
AU - Baucke, Katja
N1 - Funding information: There is no fundng to report for this study.
PY - 2021/6/21
Y1 - 2021/6/21
N2 - Introduction: Digital mental health interventions are on the rise; yet people with intellectual disabilities are not generally seen as their potential users. This study aims to explore the accessability of two mainstream online mood-management programmes. Methods: Using a qualitative study design, 12 adults with intellectual disabilities were interviewed while accessing moodgym and iFightDepression®. Thematic analysis was used to explore the programs’ accessibility according to the technology acceptance model. Results: The programs’ ease-of-use was considered in terms of visual appeal, support needs, and essential skills for independent program use. Perceived usefulness concerned participants’ understanding of the purpose and expected personal benefits associated with the interventions. Finally, intention to use and motivation to interact with the interventions were key aspects of participants’ attititudes toward them. Conclusion: Improving intervention accessibility is a first important step to ensure people with intellectual disabilities can understand the purpose and content of digital mental health interventions.
AB - Introduction: Digital mental health interventions are on the rise; yet people with intellectual disabilities are not generally seen as their potential users. This study aims to explore the accessability of two mainstream online mood-management programmes. Methods: Using a qualitative study design, 12 adults with intellectual disabilities were interviewed while accessing moodgym and iFightDepression®. Thematic analysis was used to explore the programs’ accessibility according to the technology acceptance model. Results: The programs’ ease-of-use was considered in terms of visual appeal, support needs, and essential skills for independent program use. Perceived usefulness concerned participants’ understanding of the purpose and expected personal benefits associated with the interventions. Finally, intention to use and motivation to interact with the interventions were key aspects of participants’ attititudes toward them. Conclusion: Improving intervention accessibility is a first important step to ensure people with intellectual disabilities can understand the purpose and content of digital mental health interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107517894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31234/osf.io/vtbr7
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/vtbr7
M3 - Article
VL - 14
SP - 318
EP - 343
JO - Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
SN - 1931-5864
IS - 3
ER -