Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Authors

  • Song Li
  • Jürgen Karl Peissig
  • Camilo Klinkert Correa
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventDAGA 2017: 43. Jahrestagung für Akustik - Kiel, Germany
Duration: 6 Mar 20179 Mar 2017

Conference

ConferenceDAGA 2017
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityKiel
Period6 Mar 20179 Mar 2017

Abstract

Head-related transfer function (HRTF) is widely used for binaural sound reproduction over headphones. However, the acquisition of HRTFs using traditional measurement is usually a time-consuming task and can be only acquired at discrete directions. Recent work has shown, that the HRTF measurement can be speeded up and simplified via continuous acquisition by using an adaptive filter (identification of a time-variant system). With this method the traditional sampling and interpolation of many different positions can be avoided. There are many different adaptive filter types suitable for system identification, therefore this work analyses and compares various adaptive filter algorithms like Least-MeanSquares (LMS), Normalized-LMS (NLMS), RecursiveLeast-Squares (RLS), etc. The goal of this work is to achieve faster convergence speed and low steady-state mean squared error. Thus, the convergence and tracking properties of these algorithms are analyzed and compared. This implies that time-invariant systems (fixed dummy head) as well as time-variant systems (continuously rotated dummy head) are evaluated for convergence speed and tracking capability respectively. Furthermore, the noisy environment during measurements has to be considered. For this reason, it is necessary to simulate different additive noise levels to evaluate the algorithms’ behavior under these adverse conditions.

Cite this

Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement. / Li, Song; Peissig, Jürgen Karl; Klinkert Correa, Camilo .
2017. Paper presented at DAGA 2017, Kiel, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Li S, Peissig JK, Klinkert Correa C. Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement. 2017. Paper presented at DAGA 2017, Kiel, Germany.
Li, Song ; Peissig, Jürgen Karl ; Klinkert Correa, Camilo . / Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement. Paper presented at DAGA 2017, Kiel, Germany.
Download
@conference{2509bd3981844891a0971b325578b91b,
title = "Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement",
abstract = "Head-related transfer function (HRTF) is widely used for binaural sound reproduction over headphones. However, the acquisition of HRTFs using traditional measurement is usually a time-consuming task and can be only acquired at discrete directions. Recent work has shown, that the HRTF measurement can be speeded up and simplified via continuous acquisition by using an adaptive filter (identification of a time-variant system). With this method the traditional sampling and interpolation of many different positions can be avoided. There are many different adaptive filter types suitable for system identification, therefore this work analyses and compares various adaptive filter algorithms like Least-MeanSquares (LMS), Normalized-LMS (NLMS), RecursiveLeast-Squares (RLS), etc. The goal of this work is to achieve faster convergence speed and low steady-state mean squared error. Thus, the convergence and tracking properties of these algorithms are analyzed and compared. This implies that time-invariant systems (fixed dummy head) as well as time-variant systems (continuously rotated dummy head) are evaluated for convergence speed and tracking capability respectively. Furthermore, the noisy environment during measurements has to be considered. For this reason, it is necessary to simulate different additive noise levels to evaluate the algorithms{\textquoteright} behavior under these adverse conditions.",
author = "Song Li and Peissig, {J{\"u}rgen Karl} and {Klinkert Correa}, Camilo",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
note = "DAGA 2017 : 43. Jahrestagung f{\"u}r Akustik ; Conference date: 06-03-2017 Through 09-03-2017",

}

Download

TY - CONF

T1 - Analysis and Comparison of different Adaptive Filtering Algorithms for Fast Continuous HRTF Measurement

AU - Li, Song

AU - Peissig, Jürgen Karl

AU - Klinkert Correa, Camilo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Head-related transfer function (HRTF) is widely used for binaural sound reproduction over headphones. However, the acquisition of HRTFs using traditional measurement is usually a time-consuming task and can be only acquired at discrete directions. Recent work has shown, that the HRTF measurement can be speeded up and simplified via continuous acquisition by using an adaptive filter (identification of a time-variant system). With this method the traditional sampling and interpolation of many different positions can be avoided. There are many different adaptive filter types suitable for system identification, therefore this work analyses and compares various adaptive filter algorithms like Least-MeanSquares (LMS), Normalized-LMS (NLMS), RecursiveLeast-Squares (RLS), etc. The goal of this work is to achieve faster convergence speed and low steady-state mean squared error. Thus, the convergence and tracking properties of these algorithms are analyzed and compared. This implies that time-invariant systems (fixed dummy head) as well as time-variant systems (continuously rotated dummy head) are evaluated for convergence speed and tracking capability respectively. Furthermore, the noisy environment during measurements has to be considered. For this reason, it is necessary to simulate different additive noise levels to evaluate the algorithms’ behavior under these adverse conditions.

AB - Head-related transfer function (HRTF) is widely used for binaural sound reproduction over headphones. However, the acquisition of HRTFs using traditional measurement is usually a time-consuming task and can be only acquired at discrete directions. Recent work has shown, that the HRTF measurement can be speeded up and simplified via continuous acquisition by using an adaptive filter (identification of a time-variant system). With this method the traditional sampling and interpolation of many different positions can be avoided. There are many different adaptive filter types suitable for system identification, therefore this work analyses and compares various adaptive filter algorithms like Least-MeanSquares (LMS), Normalized-LMS (NLMS), RecursiveLeast-Squares (RLS), etc. The goal of this work is to achieve faster convergence speed and low steady-state mean squared error. Thus, the convergence and tracking properties of these algorithms are analyzed and compared. This implies that time-invariant systems (fixed dummy head) as well as time-variant systems (continuously rotated dummy head) are evaluated for convergence speed and tracking capability respectively. Furthermore, the noisy environment during measurements has to be considered. For this reason, it is necessary to simulate different additive noise levels to evaluate the algorithms’ behavior under these adverse conditions.

M3 - Paper

T2 - DAGA 2017

Y2 - 6 March 2017 through 9 March 2017

ER -