Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 58-70 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | LAND USE POLICY |
Volume | 42 |
Early online date | 7 Aug 2014 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
The use of payments for ecosystem services (PES) to steer land use practices has increased considerably at an international level over past years. An efficient and effective PES implementation strategy often relies on active support from intermediaries. This paper provides an analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the environmental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PES. Cost-effectiveness refers to transaction costs, whereas environmental effectiveness refers to ecological benefits provided. The framework assists in assessing how and for what activities of PES implementation intermediaries can improve performance based on the intermediaries' institutional design. The analytical framework is based on institutional economics and applies mainly the theoretical underpinnings of transaction cost economics (TCE). This paper illustrates an example of the practical application of the framework by assessing the potential of German Landcare Associations (LCAs) to improve the performance of public PES programs. It is emphasized how key institutional design characteristics of LCAs can potentially influence (1) public and (2) private transaction costs as well as (3) participation in and (4) spatial targeting of governmental agri-environmental programs and schemes in Germany. The analytical framework is, however, not restricted to assessing the potential of intermediaries in the large public PES programs of industrialized countries. This paper discusses how the framework can be transferred to smaller private or larger supra-national PES programs and to the contexts of developing countries.
Keywords
- Agri-environmental programs, Cost-effectiveness, Environmental effectiveness, German Landcare Associations, Institutional arrangements, Transaction cost economics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Forestry
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Environmental Science(all)
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Environmental Science(all)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: LAND USE POLICY, Vol. 42, 01.01.2015, p. 58-70.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for ecosystem services
AU - Schomers, Sarah
AU - Sattler, Claudia
AU - Matzdorf, Bettina
N1 - Funding Information: The presented study has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ( BMBF ) within the Social-Ecological Research Program (SÖF), contract no. 01UU0911 . The authors are grateful for helpful comments and technical workshop support provided by Carolin Biedermann, Claas Meyer, Kristin Nicolaus and Anja Starick. We would like to thank the interviewed experts and workshop participants for their valuable input. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - The use of payments for ecosystem services (PES) to steer land use practices has increased considerably at an international level over past years. An efficient and effective PES implementation strategy often relies on active support from intermediaries. This paper provides an analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the environmental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PES. Cost-effectiveness refers to transaction costs, whereas environmental effectiveness refers to ecological benefits provided. The framework assists in assessing how and for what activities of PES implementation intermediaries can improve performance based on the intermediaries' institutional design. The analytical framework is based on institutional economics and applies mainly the theoretical underpinnings of transaction cost economics (TCE). This paper illustrates an example of the practical application of the framework by assessing the potential of German Landcare Associations (LCAs) to improve the performance of public PES programs. It is emphasized how key institutional design characteristics of LCAs can potentially influence (1) public and (2) private transaction costs as well as (3) participation in and (4) spatial targeting of governmental agri-environmental programs and schemes in Germany. The analytical framework is, however, not restricted to assessing the potential of intermediaries in the large public PES programs of industrialized countries. This paper discusses how the framework can be transferred to smaller private or larger supra-national PES programs and to the contexts of developing countries.
AB - The use of payments for ecosystem services (PES) to steer land use practices has increased considerably at an international level over past years. An efficient and effective PES implementation strategy often relies on active support from intermediaries. This paper provides an analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the environmental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PES. Cost-effectiveness refers to transaction costs, whereas environmental effectiveness refers to ecological benefits provided. The framework assists in assessing how and for what activities of PES implementation intermediaries can improve performance based on the intermediaries' institutional design. The analytical framework is based on institutional economics and applies mainly the theoretical underpinnings of transaction cost economics (TCE). This paper illustrates an example of the practical application of the framework by assessing the potential of German Landcare Associations (LCAs) to improve the performance of public PES programs. It is emphasized how key institutional design characteristics of LCAs can potentially influence (1) public and (2) private transaction costs as well as (3) participation in and (4) spatial targeting of governmental agri-environmental programs and schemes in Germany. The analytical framework is, however, not restricted to assessing the potential of intermediaries in the large public PES programs of industrialized countries. This paper discusses how the framework can be transferred to smaller private or larger supra-national PES programs and to the contexts of developing countries.
KW - Agri-environmental programs
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Environmental effectiveness
KW - German Landcare Associations
KW - Institutional arrangements
KW - Transaction cost economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907494873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.025
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84907494873
VL - 42
SP - 58
EP - 70
JO - LAND USE POLICY
JF - LAND USE POLICY
SN - 0264-8377
ER -