Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Monique Dabbous
  • Mondher Toumi
  • Steven Simoens
  • Juergen Wasem
  • Gauri Saal
  • Yitong Wang
  • José Luis Huerta Osuna
  • Clément François
  • Lieven Annemans
  • Johann Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
  • Oriol Sola-Morales
  • Daniel Malone
  • Louis P. Garrison

External Research Organisations

  • Universite d'Aix-Marseille
  • KU Leuven
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • ApotheCom
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne (UPEC)
  • Ghent University
  • HiTT Foundation
  • University of Utah
  • University of Washington
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-59
Number of pages11
JournalHEALTH POLICY
Volume126
Issue number1
Early online date16 Nov 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Abstract

With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.

Keywords

    Amortization, Funding, Gene replacement therapies (grts), Gene therapies, Market access, Payment Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments. / Dabbous, Monique; Toumi, Mondher; Simoens, Steven et al.
In: HEALTH POLICY, Vol. 126, No. 1, 01.2022, p. 49-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Dabbous, M, Toumi, M, Simoens, S, Wasem, J, Saal, G, Wang, Y, Osuna, JLH, François, C, Annemans, L, Graf von der Schulenburg, JM, Sola-Morales, O, Malone, D & Garrison, LP 2022, 'Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments', HEALTH POLICY, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005
Dabbous, M., Toumi, M., Simoens, S., Wasem, J., Saal, G., Wang, Y., Osuna, J. L. H., François, C., Annemans, L., Graf von der Schulenburg, J. M., Sola-Morales, O., Malone, D., & Garrison, L. P. (2022). Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments. HEALTH POLICY, 126(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005
Dabbous M, Toumi M, Simoens S, Wasem J, Saal G, Wang Y et al. Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments. HEALTH POLICY. 2022 Jan;126(1):49-59. Epub 2021 Nov 16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005
Download
@article{3bed66386b8c4b15901929b5b5f75ebb,
title = "Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments",
abstract = "With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.",
keywords = "Amortization, Funding, Gene replacement therapies (grts), Gene therapies, Market access, Payment Models",
author = "Monique Dabbous and Mondher Toumi and Steven Simoens and Juergen Wasem and Gauri Saal and Yitong Wang and Osuna, {Jos{\'e} Luis Huerta} and Cl{\'e}ment Fran{\c c}ois and Lieven Annemans and {Graf von der Schulenburg}, {Johann Matthias} and Oriol Sola-Morales and Daniel Malone and Garrison, {Louis P.}",
note = "Funding Information: No funding was involved in the development of this research and manuscript. ",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "49--59",
journal = "HEALTH POLICY",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amortization of gene replacement therapies

T2 - A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments

AU - Dabbous, Monique

AU - Toumi, Mondher

AU - Simoens, Steven

AU - Wasem, Juergen

AU - Saal, Gauri

AU - Wang, Yitong

AU - Osuna, José Luis Huerta

AU - François, Clément

AU - Annemans, Lieven

AU - Graf von der Schulenburg, Johann Matthias

AU - Sola-Morales, Oriol

AU - Malone, Daniel

AU - Garrison, Louis P.

N1 - Funding Information: No funding was involved in the development of this research and manuscript.

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.

AB - With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.

KW - Amortization

KW - Funding

KW - Gene replacement therapies (grts)

KW - Gene therapies

KW - Market access

KW - Payment Models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120487362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 34863529

AN - SCOPUS:85120487362

VL - 126

SP - 49

EP - 59

JO - HEALTH POLICY

JF - HEALTH POLICY

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 1

ER -