Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 49-59 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | HEALTH POLICY |
Volume | 126 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 16 Nov 2021 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Abstract
With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.
Keywords
- Amortization, Funding, Gene replacement therapies (grts), Gene therapies, Market access, Payment Models
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
- Health Policy
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: HEALTH POLICY, Vol. 126, No. 1, 01.2022, p. 49-59.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Amortization of gene replacement therapies
T2 - A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments
AU - Dabbous, Monique
AU - Toumi, Mondher
AU - Simoens, Steven
AU - Wasem, Juergen
AU - Saal, Gauri
AU - Wang, Yitong
AU - Osuna, José Luis Huerta
AU - François, Clément
AU - Annemans, Lieven
AU - Graf von der Schulenburg, Johann Matthias
AU - Sola-Morales, Oriol
AU - Malone, Daniel
AU - Garrison, Louis P.
N1 - Funding Information: No funding was involved in the development of this research and manuscript.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.
AB - With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.
KW - Amortization
KW - Funding
KW - Gene replacement therapies (grts)
KW - Gene therapies
KW - Market access
KW - Payment Models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120487362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 34863529
AN - SCOPUS:85120487362
VL - 126
SP - 49
EP - 59
JO - HEALTH POLICY
JF - HEALTH POLICY
SN - 0168-8510
IS - 1
ER -