Agrosystem services: An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
  • University of Potsdam
  • Kiel University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalLandscape Online
Volume49
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

To discriminate between the contributions of ecosystems and the human subsidies to agricultural systems, we propose using an additional terminology to bring clarification into the controversial discussion about i) ecosystems versus agrosystems and ii) ecosystem services versus agrosystem services. A literature review revealed that with the exception of some very recent publications, this has not yet been sufficiently reflected, neither within the scientific nor in the policy discussion. The question remains whether to spoil the discussion with new terms again and again. We reason that it makes sense to underpin the case-specific share of agricultural inputs to the supply of agroecosystem services and to add "agro" to the terminology. We conclude, that there is a need to promote the new terminology of agrosystem services and to strengthen the use of the already established term agroecosystem services within this context. To emphasise the production patterns behind the multiple benefits agricultural systems provide to humans (commodity and non-commodity outputs) and to guarantee a reasonable weighting of related externalities in policy processes, we suggest to introduce the term agrosystem services into the discussion on ecosystem services. Agrosystem services in this context describe the anthropogenic share of agroecosystem services' generation. Agroecosystem services include multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural services from agricultural ecosystems. The inclusion of agrosystem services might accommodate the ecology-based ecosystem services concept to the specificity of managed agricultural ecosystems and therefore could be better implemented by mostly economy-driven agricultural production systems and agricultural policy.

Keywords

    Agricultural ecosystem, Agro(eco)system, Agro-ecosystem, Agroecosystem, Agrosystem, Disservices, Services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Agrosystem services: An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture. / Wiggering, Hubert; Weißhuhn, Peter; Burkhard, Benjamin.
In: Landscape Online, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Wiggering H, Weißhuhn P, Burkhard B. Agrosystem services: An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture. Landscape Online. 2016;49(1):1-15. doi: 10.3097/LO.201649
Wiggering, Hubert ; Weißhuhn, Peter ; Burkhard, Benjamin. / Agrosystem services : An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture. In: Landscape Online. 2016 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 1-15.
Download
@article{774dbf3d9002479ca4c989bbe740ce22,
title = "Agrosystem services: An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture",
abstract = "To discriminate between the contributions of ecosystems and the human subsidies to agricultural systems, we propose using an additional terminology to bring clarification into the controversial discussion about i) ecosystems versus agrosystems and ii) ecosystem services versus agrosystem services. A literature review revealed that with the exception of some very recent publications, this has not yet been sufficiently reflected, neither within the scientific nor in the policy discussion. The question remains whether to spoil the discussion with new terms again and again. We reason that it makes sense to underpin the case-specific share of agricultural inputs to the supply of agroecosystem services and to add {"}agro{"} to the terminology. We conclude, that there is a need to promote the new terminology of agrosystem services and to strengthen the use of the already established term agroecosystem services within this context. To emphasise the production patterns behind the multiple benefits agricultural systems provide to humans (commodity and non-commodity outputs) and to guarantee a reasonable weighting of related externalities in policy processes, we suggest to introduce the term agrosystem services into the discussion on ecosystem services. Agrosystem services in this context describe the anthropogenic share of agroecosystem services' generation. Agroecosystem services include multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural services from agricultural ecosystems. The inclusion of agrosystem services might accommodate the ecology-based ecosystem services concept to the specificity of managed agricultural ecosystems and therefore could be better implemented by mostly economy-driven agricultural production systems and agricultural policy.",
keywords = "Agricultural ecosystem, Agro(eco)system, Agro-ecosystem, Agroecosystem, Agrosystem, Disservices, Services",
author = "Hubert Wiggering and Peter Wei{\ss}huhn and Benjamin Burkhard",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Authors. 2016. Copyright: Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3097/LO.201649",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1--15",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agrosystem services

T2 - An additional terminology to better understand ecosystem services delivered by agriculture

AU - Wiggering, Hubert

AU - Weißhuhn, Peter

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Authors. 2016. Copyright: Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - To discriminate between the contributions of ecosystems and the human subsidies to agricultural systems, we propose using an additional terminology to bring clarification into the controversial discussion about i) ecosystems versus agrosystems and ii) ecosystem services versus agrosystem services. A literature review revealed that with the exception of some very recent publications, this has not yet been sufficiently reflected, neither within the scientific nor in the policy discussion. The question remains whether to spoil the discussion with new terms again and again. We reason that it makes sense to underpin the case-specific share of agricultural inputs to the supply of agroecosystem services and to add "agro" to the terminology. We conclude, that there is a need to promote the new terminology of agrosystem services and to strengthen the use of the already established term agroecosystem services within this context. To emphasise the production patterns behind the multiple benefits agricultural systems provide to humans (commodity and non-commodity outputs) and to guarantee a reasonable weighting of related externalities in policy processes, we suggest to introduce the term agrosystem services into the discussion on ecosystem services. Agrosystem services in this context describe the anthropogenic share of agroecosystem services' generation. Agroecosystem services include multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural services from agricultural ecosystems. The inclusion of agrosystem services might accommodate the ecology-based ecosystem services concept to the specificity of managed agricultural ecosystems and therefore could be better implemented by mostly economy-driven agricultural production systems and agricultural policy.

AB - To discriminate between the contributions of ecosystems and the human subsidies to agricultural systems, we propose using an additional terminology to bring clarification into the controversial discussion about i) ecosystems versus agrosystems and ii) ecosystem services versus agrosystem services. A literature review revealed that with the exception of some very recent publications, this has not yet been sufficiently reflected, neither within the scientific nor in the policy discussion. The question remains whether to spoil the discussion with new terms again and again. We reason that it makes sense to underpin the case-specific share of agricultural inputs to the supply of agroecosystem services and to add "agro" to the terminology. We conclude, that there is a need to promote the new terminology of agrosystem services and to strengthen the use of the already established term agroecosystem services within this context. To emphasise the production patterns behind the multiple benefits agricultural systems provide to humans (commodity and non-commodity outputs) and to guarantee a reasonable weighting of related externalities in policy processes, we suggest to introduce the term agrosystem services into the discussion on ecosystem services. Agrosystem services in this context describe the anthropogenic share of agroecosystem services' generation. Agroecosystem services include multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural services from agricultural ecosystems. The inclusion of agrosystem services might accommodate the ecology-based ecosystem services concept to the specificity of managed agricultural ecosystems and therefore could be better implemented by mostly economy-driven agricultural production systems and agricultural policy.

KW - Agricultural ecosystem

KW - Agro(eco)system

KW - Agro-ecosystem

KW - Agroecosystem

KW - Agrosystem

KW - Disservices

KW - Services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994049264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3097/LO.201649

DO - 10.3097/LO.201649

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994049264

VL - 49

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Landscape Online

JF - Landscape Online

SN - 1865-1542

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)