Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Benedikt Heuckmann
  • Marcus Hammann
  • Roman Asshoff

External Research Organisations

  • University of Münster
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number268
JournalEducation Sciences
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date7 Nov 2019
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Teachers’ beliefs about science teaching vary greatly. To analyze the relationships between teachers’ beliefs and other variables related to teaching and learning, researchers can use the following two options: single item belief models or belief scales. In this study, we compared both models in the context of teachers’ beliefs regarding teaching about cancer. Although both models exhibited a good model fit, each approach had both advantages and disadvantages when we judged the modelling approaches in terms of fulfilling the requirements of common psychometric standards and adequately acknowledging the diversity of different beliefs. We discuss the predictive value of both models and their contribution to planning belief-based interventions for cancer education. We argue that researchers should combine the advantages of single item and scale models when analyzing the diversity of teachers’ beliefs.

Keywords

    Beliefs, Biology education, Cancer education, Intervention, MIMIC model, Structural equation modeling, Teacher training, Theory of planned behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior. / Heuckmann, Benedikt; Hammann, Marcus; Asshoff, Roman.
In: Education Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, 268, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Heuckmann B, Hammann M, Asshoff R. Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Education Sciences. 2019 Dec;9(4):268. Epub 2019 Nov 7. doi: 10.3390/educsci9040268
Heuckmann, Benedikt ; Hammann, Marcus ; Asshoff, Roman. / Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Education Sciences. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4.
Download
@article{8ce61ecd391443d9b2c964802e28fd6d,
title = "Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior",
abstract = "Teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs about science teaching vary greatly. To analyze the relationships between teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs and other variables related to teaching and learning, researchers can use the following two options: single item belief models or belief scales. In this study, we compared both models in the context of teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs regarding teaching about cancer. Although both models exhibited a good model fit, each approach had both advantages and disadvantages when we judged the modelling approaches in terms of fulfilling the requirements of common psychometric standards and adequately acknowledging the diversity of different beliefs. We discuss the predictive value of both models and their contribution to planning belief-based interventions for cancer education. We argue that researchers should combine the advantages of single item and scale models when analyzing the diversity of teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs.",
keywords = "Beliefs, Biology education, Cancer education, Intervention, MIMIC model, Structural equation modeling, Teacher training, Theory of planned behavior",
author = "Benedikt Heuckmann and Marcus Hammann and Roman Asshoff",
note = "Funding information: Acknowledgments: We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Muenster.",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
doi = "10.3390/educsci9040268",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior

AU - Heuckmann, Benedikt

AU - Hammann, Marcus

AU - Asshoff, Roman

N1 - Funding information: Acknowledgments: We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Muenster.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Teachers’ beliefs about science teaching vary greatly. To analyze the relationships between teachers’ beliefs and other variables related to teaching and learning, researchers can use the following two options: single item belief models or belief scales. In this study, we compared both models in the context of teachers’ beliefs regarding teaching about cancer. Although both models exhibited a good model fit, each approach had both advantages and disadvantages when we judged the modelling approaches in terms of fulfilling the requirements of common psychometric standards and adequately acknowledging the diversity of different beliefs. We discuss the predictive value of both models and their contribution to planning belief-based interventions for cancer education. We argue that researchers should combine the advantages of single item and scale models when analyzing the diversity of teachers’ beliefs.

AB - Teachers’ beliefs about science teaching vary greatly. To analyze the relationships between teachers’ beliefs and other variables related to teaching and learning, researchers can use the following two options: single item belief models or belief scales. In this study, we compared both models in the context of teachers’ beliefs regarding teaching about cancer. Although both models exhibited a good model fit, each approach had both advantages and disadvantages when we judged the modelling approaches in terms of fulfilling the requirements of common psychometric standards and adequately acknowledging the diversity of different beliefs. We discuss the predictive value of both models and their contribution to planning belief-based interventions for cancer education. We argue that researchers should combine the advantages of single item and scale models when analyzing the diversity of teachers’ beliefs.

KW - Beliefs

KW - Biology education

KW - Cancer education

KW - Intervention

KW - MIMIC model

KW - Structural equation modeling

KW - Teacher training

KW - Theory of planned behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074633827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/educsci9040268

DO - 10.3390/educsci9040268

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Education Sciences

JF - Education Sciences

SN - 2227-7102

IS - 4

M1 - 268

ER -