Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 293-299 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1993 |
Abstract
Using a model solution of 12 aroma compounds, representative of microbial volatiles, 31 different adsorptive materials were investigated with regard to their solid phase extraction and desorption properties. Well known styrene—divinylbenzene‐based resins and alternative adsorbents including zeolites, β‐cyclodextrin and modified activated carbon were compared. Adsorption/desorption rates in aqueous solution were determined for each adsorbent. Isotherms and adsorption kinetics were determined for the most effective adsorbents.
Keywords
- adsorbents, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, aroma compounds, recovery
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
- Biotechnology
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- General Chemical Engineering
- Energy(all)
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Energy(all)
- Fuel Technology
- Environmental Science(all)
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Environmental Science(all)
- Pollution
- Chemistry(all)
- Organic Chemistry
- Chemistry(all)
- Inorganic Chemistry
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1993, p. 293-299.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Adsorbents for the recovery of aroma compounds in fermentation processes
AU - Krings, Ulrich
AU - Kelch, Markus
AU - Berger, Ralf G.
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - Using a model solution of 12 aroma compounds, representative of microbial volatiles, 31 different adsorptive materials were investigated with regard to their solid phase extraction and desorption properties. Well known styrene—divinylbenzene‐based resins and alternative adsorbents including zeolites, β‐cyclodextrin and modified activated carbon were compared. Adsorption/desorption rates in aqueous solution were determined for each adsorbent. Isotherms and adsorption kinetics were determined for the most effective adsorbents.
AB - Using a model solution of 12 aroma compounds, representative of microbial volatiles, 31 different adsorptive materials were investigated with regard to their solid phase extraction and desorption properties. Well known styrene—divinylbenzene‐based resins and alternative adsorbents including zeolites, β‐cyclodextrin and modified activated carbon were compared. Adsorption/desorption rates in aqueous solution were determined for each adsorbent. Isotherms and adsorption kinetics were determined for the most effective adsorbents.
KW - adsorbents
KW - adsorption isotherms
KW - adsorption kinetics
KW - aroma compounds
KW - recovery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027515225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jctb.280580314
DO - 10.1002/jctb.280580314
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0027515225
VL - 58
SP - 293
EP - 299
JO - Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
JF - Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
SN - 0268-2575
IS - 3
ER -