Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1324-1337 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
| Volume | 149 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 24 Feb 2021 |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2021 |
Abstract
Wireless transmission of audio from or to signal processors of cochlear implants (CIs) is used to improve speech understanding of CI users. This transmission requires wireless communication to exchange the necessary data. Because they are battery powered devices, energy consumption needs to be kept low in CIs, therefore making bitrate reduction of the audio signals necessary. Additionally, low latency is essential. Previously, a codec for the electrodograms of CIs, called the Electrocodec, was proposed. In this work, a subjective evaluation of the Electrocodec is presented, which investigates the impact of the codec on monaural speech performance. The Electrocodec is evaluated with respect to speech recognition and quality in ten CI users and compared to the Opus audio codec. Opus is a low latency and low bitrate audio codec that best met the CI requirements in terms of bandwidth, bitrate, and latency. Achieving equal speech recognition and quality as Opus, the Electrocodec achieves lower mean bitrates than Opus. Actual rates vary from 24.3 up to 53.5 kbit/s, depending on the codec settings. While Opus has a minimum algorithmic latency of 5 ms, the Electrocodec has an algorithmic latency of 0 ms.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities(all)
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 149, No. 2, 02.2021, p. 1324-1337.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A subjective and objective evaluation of a codec for the electrical stimulation patterns of cochlear implants
AU - Hinrichs, Reemt
AU - Gajecki, Tom
AU - Ostermann, Jörn
AU - Nogueira, Waldo
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC 2177/1-Project ID 390895286.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Wireless transmission of audio from or to signal processors of cochlear implants (CIs) is used to improve speech understanding of CI users. This transmission requires wireless communication to exchange the necessary data. Because they are battery powered devices, energy consumption needs to be kept low in CIs, therefore making bitrate reduction of the audio signals necessary. Additionally, low latency is essential. Previously, a codec for the electrodograms of CIs, called the Electrocodec, was proposed. In this work, a subjective evaluation of the Electrocodec is presented, which investigates the impact of the codec on monaural speech performance. The Electrocodec is evaluated with respect to speech recognition and quality in ten CI users and compared to the Opus audio codec. Opus is a low latency and low bitrate audio codec that best met the CI requirements in terms of bandwidth, bitrate, and latency. Achieving equal speech recognition and quality as Opus, the Electrocodec achieves lower mean bitrates than Opus. Actual rates vary from 24.3 up to 53.5 kbit/s, depending on the codec settings. While Opus has a minimum algorithmic latency of 5 ms, the Electrocodec has an algorithmic latency of 0 ms.
AB - Wireless transmission of audio from or to signal processors of cochlear implants (CIs) is used to improve speech understanding of CI users. This transmission requires wireless communication to exchange the necessary data. Because they are battery powered devices, energy consumption needs to be kept low in CIs, therefore making bitrate reduction of the audio signals necessary. Additionally, low latency is essential. Previously, a codec for the electrodograms of CIs, called the Electrocodec, was proposed. In this work, a subjective evaluation of the Electrocodec is presented, which investigates the impact of the codec on monaural speech performance. The Electrocodec is evaluated with respect to speech recognition and quality in ten CI users and compared to the Opus audio codec. Opus is a low latency and low bitrate audio codec that best met the CI requirements in terms of bandwidth, bitrate, and latency. Achieving equal speech recognition and quality as Opus, the Electrocodec achieves lower mean bitrates than Opus. Actual rates vary from 24.3 up to 53.5 kbit/s, depending on the codec settings. While Opus has a minimum algorithmic latency of 5 ms, the Electrocodec has an algorithmic latency of 0 ms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101747813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/10.0003571
DO - 10.1121/10.0003571
M3 - Article
C2 - 33639785
AN - SCOPUS:85101747813
VL - 149
SP - 1324
EP - 1337
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
SN - 0001-4966
IS - 2
ER -