A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Dagmar Haase
  • Neele Larondelle
  • Erik Andersson
  • Martina Artmann
  • Sara Borgström
  • Jürgen Breuste
  • Erik Gomez-Baggethun
  • Åsa Gren
  • Zoé Hamstead
  • Rieke Hansen
  • Nadja Kabisch
  • Peleg Kremer
  • Johannes Langemeyer
  • Emily Lorance Rall
  • Timon McPhearson
  • Stephan Pauleit
  • Salman Qureshi
  • Nina Schwarz
  • Annette Voigt
  • Daniel Wurster
  • Thomas Elmqvist

External Research Organisations

  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC)
  • University of Salzburg
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)
  • Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics
  • New School University
  • Technical University of Munich (TUM)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-433
Number of pages21
JournalAMBIO
Volume43
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - May 2014
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve biophysical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.

Keywords

    Demand-provisioning, Models, Policy implementation, Review, Urban ecosystem services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. / Haase, Dagmar; Larondelle, Neele; Andersson, Erik et al.
In: AMBIO, Vol. 43, No. 4, 05.2014, p. 413-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Haase, D, Larondelle, N, Andersson, E, Artmann, M, Borgström, S, Breuste, J, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Gren, Å, Hamstead, Z, Hansen, R, Kabisch, N, Kremer, P, Langemeyer, J, Rall, EL, McPhearson, T, Pauleit, S, Qureshi, S, Schwarz, N, Voigt, A, Wurster, D & Elmqvist, T 2014, 'A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation', AMBIO, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E. L., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., ... Elmqvist, T. (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. AMBIO, 43(4), 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgström S, Breuste J et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. AMBIO. 2014 May;43(4):413-433. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Haase, Dagmar ; Larondelle, Neele ; Andersson, Erik et al. / A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments : Concepts, models, and implementation. In: AMBIO. 2014 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 413-433.
Download
@article{bfdc9c39b3594df0aad9eddba90cf926,
title = "A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation",
abstract = "Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve biophysical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.",
keywords = "Demand-provisioning, Models, Policy implementation, Review, Urban ecosystem services",
author = "Dagmar Haase and Neele Larondelle and Erik Andersson and Martina Artmann and Sara Borgstr{\"o}m and J{\"u}rgen Breuste and Erik Gomez-Baggethun and {\AA}sa Gren and Zo{\'e} Hamstead and Rieke Hansen and Nadja Kabisch and Peleg Kremer and Johannes Langemeyer and Rall, {Emily Lorance} and Timon McPhearson and Stephan Pauleit and Salman Qureshi and Nina Schwarz and Annette Voigt and Daniel Wurster and Thomas Elmqvist",
year = "2014",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "413--433",
journal = "AMBIO",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments

T2 - Concepts, models, and implementation

AU - Haase, Dagmar

AU - Larondelle, Neele

AU - Andersson, Erik

AU - Artmann, Martina

AU - Borgström, Sara

AU - Breuste, Jürgen

AU - Gomez-Baggethun, Erik

AU - Gren, Åsa

AU - Hamstead, Zoé

AU - Hansen, Rieke

AU - Kabisch, Nadja

AU - Kremer, Peleg

AU - Langemeyer, Johannes

AU - Rall, Emily Lorance

AU - McPhearson, Timon

AU - Pauleit, Stephan

AU - Qureshi, Salman

AU - Schwarz, Nina

AU - Voigt, Annette

AU - Wurster, Daniel

AU - Elmqvist, Thomas

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve biophysical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.

AB - Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve biophysical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.

KW - Demand-provisioning

KW - Models

KW - Policy implementation

KW - Review

KW - Urban ecosystem services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902076188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0

DO - 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24740614

AN - SCOPUS:84902076188

VL - 43

SP - 413

EP - 433

JO - AMBIO

JF - AMBIO

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 4

ER -

By the same author(s)