Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Rolf Sternberg
  • Johannes von Bloh
  • Alicia Coduras

External Research Organisations

  • London Business School (LBS)
Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 35
    • Policy Citations: 3
  • Captures
    • Readers: 130
  • Mentions
    • News Mentions: 1
see details

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-117
Number of pages15
JournalZeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie
Volume63
Issue number2-4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Abstract

The term 'entrepreneurial eco-system' (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography - and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, 'creative class' members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is "fuzzy" (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are "scanty" (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially naïve. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik Stam's interpretation of an EES based upon ten "conditions" for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper's aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.

Keywords

    Entrepreneurial eco-system, entrepreneurship theory, region, regional growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. / Sternberg, Rolf; von Bloh, Johannes; Coduras, Alicia.
In: Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, Vol. 63, No. 2-4, 01.11.2019, p. 103-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Sternberg R, von Bloh J, Coduras A. A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. 2019 Nov 1;63(2-4):103-117. doi: 10.1515/zfw-2018-0014
Sternberg, Rolf ; von Bloh, Johannes ; Coduras, Alicia. / A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. In: Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. 2019 ; Vol. 63, No. 2-4. pp. 103-117.
Download
@article{26279519f73c4b08a940a1bd5f22d201,
title = "A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level",
abstract = "The term 'entrepreneurial eco-system' (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography - and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, 'creative class' members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is {"}fuzzy{"} (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are {"}scanty{"} (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially na{\"i}ve. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik Stam's interpretation of an EES based upon ten {"}conditions{"} for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper's aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurial eco-system, entrepreneurship theory, region, regional growth",
author = "Rolf Sternberg and {von Bloh}, Johannes and Alicia Coduras",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/zfw-2018-0014",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "103--117",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie",
issn = "0044-3751",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "2-4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level

AU - Sternberg, Rolf

AU - von Bloh, Johannes

AU - Coduras, Alicia

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - The term 'entrepreneurial eco-system' (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography - and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, 'creative class' members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is "fuzzy" (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are "scanty" (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially naïve. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik Stam's interpretation of an EES based upon ten "conditions" for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper's aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.

AB - The term 'entrepreneurial eco-system' (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography - and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, 'creative class' members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is "fuzzy" (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are "scanty" (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially naïve. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik Stam's interpretation of an EES based upon ten "conditions" for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper's aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.

KW - Entrepreneurial eco-system

KW - entrepreneurship theory

KW - region

KW - regional growth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064393121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/zfw-2018-0014

DO - 10.1515/zfw-2018-0014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064393121

VL - 63

SP - 103

EP - 117

JO - Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie

JF - Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie

SN - 0044-3751

IS - 2-4

ER -