Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 330-335 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects |
| Volume | 560 |
| Early online date | 6 Oct 2018 |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Jan 2019 |
Abstract
The DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) approach to predict colloid mobility in porous media is centered on solution ionic strength and physicochemical surface properties of colloids and solid matrix. However, several colloid retention mechanisms are not related to such interfacial properties, but instead to hydraulic features like flow regime and pore structure. We aimed to determine the relative importance of DLVO-related and non-DLVO-related retention mechanisms, which remains poorly understood. For that, we developed a conceptual approach based on previous research on organic matter-coated goethite (OMCG) colloid mobility in quartz sand. OMCG colloid retention by DLVO mechanisms was negligible at 0.0 mM ionic strength. Therefore, any retention at 0.0 mM can be assigned to non-DLVO retention. At increasing ionic strength, the amount of DLVO retention is rising, while the amount of non-DLVO retention is independent from ionic strength and thus remains constant. This allows for a differentiation between the two types of retention mechanisms. To test this conceptual approach, we conducted OMCG colloid breakthrough experiments at varying interfacial conditions (ionic strength: 0.0–5.53 mM) and hydraulic conditions (flow rate: 0.11 – 5.02 cm min−1). From sessile drop contact angles and zeta potentials, DLVO and extended DLVO (XDLVO) interactions including Lewis acid-base interactions were approximated. The results show that colloid retention was almost exclusively related to DLVO retention mechanisms, while retention by hydraulic factors was practically irrelevant. We conclude that our conceptual approach can be applied to determine the relative importance of colloid retention caused by DLVO and non-DLVO mechanisms for further colloid-solid matrix systems.
Keywords
- Colloid retention mechanisms, DLVO, Flow velocity, Ionic strength, Iron oxide colloids
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Surfaces and Interfaces
- Chemistry(all)
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Colloid and Surface Chemistry
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Vol. 560, 05.01.2019, p. 330-335.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A new approach to determine the relative importance of DLVO and non-DLVO colloid retention mechanisms in porous media
AU - Carstens, Jannis F.
AU - Bachmann, Jörg
AU - Neuweiler, Insa
PY - 2019/1/5
Y1 - 2019/1/5
N2 - The DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) approach to predict colloid mobility in porous media is centered on solution ionic strength and physicochemical surface properties of colloids and solid matrix. However, several colloid retention mechanisms are not related to such interfacial properties, but instead to hydraulic features like flow regime and pore structure. We aimed to determine the relative importance of DLVO-related and non-DLVO-related retention mechanisms, which remains poorly understood. For that, we developed a conceptual approach based on previous research on organic matter-coated goethite (OMCG) colloid mobility in quartz sand. OMCG colloid retention by DLVO mechanisms was negligible at 0.0 mM ionic strength. Therefore, any retention at 0.0 mM can be assigned to non-DLVO retention. At increasing ionic strength, the amount of DLVO retention is rising, while the amount of non-DLVO retention is independent from ionic strength and thus remains constant. This allows for a differentiation between the two types of retention mechanisms. To test this conceptual approach, we conducted OMCG colloid breakthrough experiments at varying interfacial conditions (ionic strength: 0.0–5.53 mM) and hydraulic conditions (flow rate: 0.11 – 5.02 cm min−1). From sessile drop contact angles and zeta potentials, DLVO and extended DLVO (XDLVO) interactions including Lewis acid-base interactions were approximated. The results show that colloid retention was almost exclusively related to DLVO retention mechanisms, while retention by hydraulic factors was practically irrelevant. We conclude that our conceptual approach can be applied to determine the relative importance of colloid retention caused by DLVO and non-DLVO mechanisms for further colloid-solid matrix systems.
AB - The DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) approach to predict colloid mobility in porous media is centered on solution ionic strength and physicochemical surface properties of colloids and solid matrix. However, several colloid retention mechanisms are not related to such interfacial properties, but instead to hydraulic features like flow regime and pore structure. We aimed to determine the relative importance of DLVO-related and non-DLVO-related retention mechanisms, which remains poorly understood. For that, we developed a conceptual approach based on previous research on organic matter-coated goethite (OMCG) colloid mobility in quartz sand. OMCG colloid retention by DLVO mechanisms was negligible at 0.0 mM ionic strength. Therefore, any retention at 0.0 mM can be assigned to non-DLVO retention. At increasing ionic strength, the amount of DLVO retention is rising, while the amount of non-DLVO retention is independent from ionic strength and thus remains constant. This allows for a differentiation between the two types of retention mechanisms. To test this conceptual approach, we conducted OMCG colloid breakthrough experiments at varying interfacial conditions (ionic strength: 0.0–5.53 mM) and hydraulic conditions (flow rate: 0.11 – 5.02 cm min−1). From sessile drop contact angles and zeta potentials, DLVO and extended DLVO (XDLVO) interactions including Lewis acid-base interactions were approximated. The results show that colloid retention was almost exclusively related to DLVO retention mechanisms, while retention by hydraulic factors was practically irrelevant. We conclude that our conceptual approach can be applied to determine the relative importance of colloid retention caused by DLVO and non-DLVO mechanisms for further colloid-solid matrix systems.
KW - Colloid retention mechanisms
KW - DLVO
KW - Flow velocity
KW - Ionic strength
KW - Iron oxide colloids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055022624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055022624
VL - 560
SP - 330
EP - 335
JO - Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
JF - Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
SN - 0927-7757
ER -