Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 111211 |
| Journal | Building and environment |
| Volume | 251 |
| Early online date | 13 Jan 2024 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2024 |
Abstract
In the last decade, many studies focused on finding optimal design solutions considering trade-offs between different aspects of building design. Accordingly, multi-objective optimization (MOO) approaches have been increasingly applied in the building industry. However, certain aspects must be deepened to ensure a more effective decision-making process in the early planning phase. On the one hand, uncertainties should be considered before making decisions to ensure the robustness of the optimal solutions; on the other hand, decisions are made at different times in building planning, and the sequential order of making decisions should be modeled. This paper presents a holistic two-stage multi-objective stochastic optimization (MOSO)-II framework to minimize the environmental impact of global warming potential (GWP) and cost throughout the entire life cycle of a building (phases of A1-A3, B4, B6 and C3-C4), considering passive and active design strategies in two consecutive stages, under uncertainty. Herein, individual/use and political/market uncertainties are considered. As a proof of concept, the proposed framework is applied in a case study for a generic zone in a multi-family terraced residential building type with solid brick construction. The advantages of the proposed framework are validated by comparing it with alternative single-stage MOSO frameworks. Results show that the proposed two-stage MOSO-II framework can deliver a smaller range of solutions with a better performance in terms of lower GWP and cost. It indicates that the proposed framework can effectively assist planners in decision-making by reducing the effort in choosing the proper solution. Secondly, the results also emphasize the importance of passive design strategies in sustainable building planning. In addition, the energy mix structure and cost of energy sources should be carefully adjusted in the future to promote a more ecologically sustainable building design.
Keywords
- Decision-making, Life cycle assessment, Machine learning, Multi-objective optimization, Passive design, Two-stage stochastic programming, Uncertainty
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Engineering(all)
- Building and Construction
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Building and environment, Vol. 251, 111211, 01.03.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A holistic two-stage decision-making methodology for passive and active building design strategies under uncertainty
AU - Zong, Chujun
AU - Chen, Xia
AU - Deghim, Fatma
AU - Staudt, Johannes
AU - Geyer, Philipp
AU - Lang, Werner
N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation, DFG) under grant FOR2363 —project number: 271444440 . The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions which helped to improve the quality of this paper.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - In the last decade, many studies focused on finding optimal design solutions considering trade-offs between different aspects of building design. Accordingly, multi-objective optimization (MOO) approaches have been increasingly applied in the building industry. However, certain aspects must be deepened to ensure a more effective decision-making process in the early planning phase. On the one hand, uncertainties should be considered before making decisions to ensure the robustness of the optimal solutions; on the other hand, decisions are made at different times in building planning, and the sequential order of making decisions should be modeled. This paper presents a holistic two-stage multi-objective stochastic optimization (MOSO)-II framework to minimize the environmental impact of global warming potential (GWP) and cost throughout the entire life cycle of a building (phases of A1-A3, B4, B6 and C3-C4), considering passive and active design strategies in two consecutive stages, under uncertainty. Herein, individual/use and political/market uncertainties are considered. As a proof of concept, the proposed framework is applied in a case study for a generic zone in a multi-family terraced residential building type with solid brick construction. The advantages of the proposed framework are validated by comparing it with alternative single-stage MOSO frameworks. Results show that the proposed two-stage MOSO-II framework can deliver a smaller range of solutions with a better performance in terms of lower GWP and cost. It indicates that the proposed framework can effectively assist planners in decision-making by reducing the effort in choosing the proper solution. Secondly, the results also emphasize the importance of passive design strategies in sustainable building planning. In addition, the energy mix structure and cost of energy sources should be carefully adjusted in the future to promote a more ecologically sustainable building design.
AB - In the last decade, many studies focused on finding optimal design solutions considering trade-offs between different aspects of building design. Accordingly, multi-objective optimization (MOO) approaches have been increasingly applied in the building industry. However, certain aspects must be deepened to ensure a more effective decision-making process in the early planning phase. On the one hand, uncertainties should be considered before making decisions to ensure the robustness of the optimal solutions; on the other hand, decisions are made at different times in building planning, and the sequential order of making decisions should be modeled. This paper presents a holistic two-stage multi-objective stochastic optimization (MOSO)-II framework to minimize the environmental impact of global warming potential (GWP) and cost throughout the entire life cycle of a building (phases of A1-A3, B4, B6 and C3-C4), considering passive and active design strategies in two consecutive stages, under uncertainty. Herein, individual/use and political/market uncertainties are considered. As a proof of concept, the proposed framework is applied in a case study for a generic zone in a multi-family terraced residential building type with solid brick construction. The advantages of the proposed framework are validated by comparing it with alternative single-stage MOSO frameworks. Results show that the proposed two-stage MOSO-II framework can deliver a smaller range of solutions with a better performance in terms of lower GWP and cost. It indicates that the proposed framework can effectively assist planners in decision-making by reducing the effort in choosing the proper solution. Secondly, the results also emphasize the importance of passive design strategies in sustainable building planning. In addition, the energy mix structure and cost of energy sources should be carefully adjusted in the future to promote a more ecologically sustainable building design.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Machine learning
KW - Multi-objective optimization
KW - Passive design
KW - Two-stage stochastic programming
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183548591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111211
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111211
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183548591
VL - 251
JO - Building and environment
JF - Building and environment
SN - 0360-1323
M1 - 111211
ER -