A construção das diferenças no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)100-120
JournalREJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
Volume6
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Abstract

The article seeks to analyze the construction of differences in Chilean constitutionalism from the problematic relationship between law and diversity. It starts from the tensions between different forms of social observation of diversity to rethink the problem of alterity in the Chilean constitutions from 1810 to 1980.
From this perspective, the historical evolution of the constitution can be seen, in addition to its claims of formal equality, as a continuous process of building legal differences. Focusing on the differences constructed through Chilean constitutional history, one can rethink the transition from the ancien régime to
modern constitutionalism not as an equality-oriented process, but as the construction and unfolding of new differences. Constitutional history shows that legal models have not produced a par tout equalization of the population. Instead, equality and difference were reconstructed and adapted to the societies that
emerged from the dissolution of the ancien régime order.

Cite this

A construção das diferenças no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980). / Bastias Saavedra, Manuel.
In: REJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA, Vol. 6, No. 12, 2022, p. 100-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Bastias Saavedra M. A construção das diferenças no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980). REJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA. 2022;6(12):100-120. doi: 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n12.p100-120.2022
Bastias Saavedra, Manuel. / A construção das diferenças no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980). In: REJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA. 2022 ; Vol. 6, No. 12. pp. 100-120.
Download
@article{429342fc63f742f695a3818f97a73a9d,
title = "A constru{\c c}{\~a}o das diferen{\c c}as no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980)",
abstract = "The article seeks to analyze the construction of differences in Chilean constitutionalism from the problematic relationship between law and diversity. It starts from the tensions between different forms of social observation of diversity to rethink the problem of alterity in the Chilean constitutions from 1810 to 1980.From this perspective, the historical evolution of the constitution can be seen, in addition to its claims of formal equality, as a continuous process of building legal differences. Focusing on the differences constructed through Chilean constitutional history, one can rethink the transition from the ancien r{\'e}gime tomodern constitutionalism not as an equality-oriented process, but as the construction and unfolding of new differences. Constitutional history shows that legal models have not produced a par tout equalization of the population. Instead, equality and difference were reconstructed and adapted to the societies thatemerged from the dissolution of the ancien r{\'e}gime order.",
author = "{Bastias Saavedra}, Manuel",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n12.p100-120.2022",
language = "Portuguese",
volume = "6",
pages = "100--120",
number = "12",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A construção das diferenças no constitucionalismo chileno (1810-1980)

AU - Bastias Saavedra, Manuel

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The article seeks to analyze the construction of differences in Chilean constitutionalism from the problematic relationship between law and diversity. It starts from the tensions between different forms of social observation of diversity to rethink the problem of alterity in the Chilean constitutions from 1810 to 1980.From this perspective, the historical evolution of the constitution can be seen, in addition to its claims of formal equality, as a continuous process of building legal differences. Focusing on the differences constructed through Chilean constitutional history, one can rethink the transition from the ancien régime tomodern constitutionalism not as an equality-oriented process, but as the construction and unfolding of new differences. Constitutional history shows that legal models have not produced a par tout equalization of the population. Instead, equality and difference were reconstructed and adapted to the societies thatemerged from the dissolution of the ancien régime order.

AB - The article seeks to analyze the construction of differences in Chilean constitutionalism from the problematic relationship between law and diversity. It starts from the tensions between different forms of social observation of diversity to rethink the problem of alterity in the Chilean constitutions from 1810 to 1980.From this perspective, the historical evolution of the constitution can be seen, in addition to its claims of formal equality, as a continuous process of building legal differences. Focusing on the differences constructed through Chilean constitutional history, one can rethink the transition from the ancien régime tomodern constitutionalism not as an equality-oriented process, but as the construction and unfolding of new differences. Constitutional history shows that legal models have not produced a par tout equalization of the population. Instead, equality and difference were reconstructed and adapted to the societies thatemerged from the dissolution of the ancien régime order.

U2 - 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n12.p100-120.2022

DO - 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n12.p100-120.2022

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 100

EP - 120

JO - REJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA

JF - REJUR - Revista Jurídica da UFERSA

SN - 2526-9488

IS - 12

ER -

By the same author(s)