Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering 2022 (OMAE 2022) |
| Subtitle of host publication | Volume 7: CFD and FSI |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 9780791885925 |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Oct 2022 |
Abstract
To accurately describe the motion of floating structures in waves using low-fidelity methods (Boundary Element Method, analytic methods), roll damping has to be determined with higher fidelity due to the influence of viscous effects. In these higher-fidelity estimations, either existing models like Ikeda’s model, which was validated using model test results, or Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations are frequently used. Forced roll tests are the main method to estimate the hydrodynamic properties (damping & added mass). In this study, three different numerical approaches to simulate structures in roll motions in grid based Finite Volume Method schemes are compared regarding their efficiency and numerical accuracy. The results of this study show a good agreement between all three methods. While mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface show similar results, the runtime of the Arbitrary Mesh Interface is increased by factor three. The most computationally challenging method is the overset method, which has its benefits in more complex motion environments and need further improvement to be a feasible alternative to the established methods mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface.
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering 2022 (OMAE 2022): Volume 7: CFD and FSI. 2022. V007T08A054.
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - A Comparison of Different Numerical Methods to Simulate Forced Roll Oscillations of Floating Structures in Grid-Based Schemes
AU - Meyer, Jannik
AU - Neufeldt, Henrik
AU - Hildebrandt, Arndt
N1 - Funding Information: This work has been funded by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - SFB1463 - 434502799.
PY - 2022/10/13
Y1 - 2022/10/13
N2 - To accurately describe the motion of floating structures in waves using low-fidelity methods (Boundary Element Method, analytic methods), roll damping has to be determined with higher fidelity due to the influence of viscous effects. In these higher-fidelity estimations, either existing models like Ikeda’s model, which was validated using model test results, or Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations are frequently used. Forced roll tests are the main method to estimate the hydrodynamic properties (damping & added mass). In this study, three different numerical approaches to simulate structures in roll motions in grid based Finite Volume Method schemes are compared regarding their efficiency and numerical accuracy. The results of this study show a good agreement between all three methods. While mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface show similar results, the runtime of the Arbitrary Mesh Interface is increased by factor three. The most computationally challenging method is the overset method, which has its benefits in more complex motion environments and need further improvement to be a feasible alternative to the established methods mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface.
AB - To accurately describe the motion of floating structures in waves using low-fidelity methods (Boundary Element Method, analytic methods), roll damping has to be determined with higher fidelity due to the influence of viscous effects. In these higher-fidelity estimations, either existing models like Ikeda’s model, which was validated using model test results, or Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations are frequently used. Forced roll tests are the main method to estimate the hydrodynamic properties (damping & added mass). In this study, three different numerical approaches to simulate structures in roll motions in grid based Finite Volume Method schemes are compared regarding their efficiency and numerical accuracy. The results of this study show a good agreement between all three methods. While mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface show similar results, the runtime of the Arbitrary Mesh Interface is increased by factor three. The most computationally challenging method is the overset method, which has its benefits in more complex motion environments and need further improvement to be a feasible alternative to the established methods mesh morphing and Arbitrary Mesh Interface.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140792841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/omae2022-80510
DO - 10.1115/omae2022-80510
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 978-0-7918-8592-5
BT - International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering 2022 (OMAE 2022)
ER -