A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • M. J. Holzweissig
  • M. C. Uslu
  • H. G. Lambers
  • D. Canadinc
  • H. J. Maier

External Research Organisations

  • Paderborn University
  • Koc University
  • Benteler Automotive
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-147
Number of pages7
JournalMaterials Research Letters
Volume1
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 10 May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the macroscopic transformation strain evolution as a function of the bainite and martensite phase fractions in steels. Specifically, the evolution of anisotropic strain with phase fraction follows a linear trend for the martensitic transformation due to continuous stress-induced variant selection. In the case of bainitic transformation, the anisotropic strain evolves non-linearly owing to diffusion, minimizing the distortion around the bainitic sheaves and further promoting stress-induced variant selection at the early stages of the bainitic phase transformation. However, this effectiveness is reduced when the bainitic sheaves start constricting the growth of each other.

Keywords

    Anisotropic strain, Austenite, Bainite, Martensite, Phase transformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels. / Holzweissig, M. J.; Uslu, M. C.; Lambers, H. G. et al.
In: Materials Research Letters, Vol. 1, No. 3, 10.05.2013, p. 141-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Holzweissig MJ, Uslu MC, Lambers HG, Canadinc D, Maier HJ. A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels. Materials Research Letters. 2013 May 10;1(3):141-147. doi: 10.1080/21663831.2013.798748
Holzweissig, M. J. ; Uslu, M. C. ; Lambers, H. G. et al. / A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels. In: Materials Research Letters. 2013 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 141-147.
Download
@article{ad5f79e4872148cea27866d78864c079,
title = "A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels",
abstract = "This paper presents a comparison of the macroscopic transformation strain evolution as a function of the bainite and martensite phase fractions in steels. Specifically, the evolution of anisotropic strain with phase fraction follows a linear trend for the martensitic transformation due to continuous stress-induced variant selection. In the case of bainitic transformation, the anisotropic strain evolves non-linearly owing to diffusion, minimizing the distortion around the bainitic sheaves and further promoting stress-induced variant selection at the early stages of the bainitic phase transformation. However, this effectiveness is reduced when the bainitic sheaves start constricting the growth of each other.",
keywords = "Anisotropic strain, Austenite, Bainite, Martensite, Phase transformation",
author = "Holzweissig, {M. J.} and Uslu, {M. C.} and Lambers, {H. G.} and D. Canadinc and Maier, {H. J.}",
year = "2013",
month = may,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/21663831.2013.798748",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "141--147",
journal = "Materials Research Letters",
issn = "2166-3831",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparative Analysis of Austenite-to-Martensite and Austenite-to-Bainite Phase Transformation Kinetics in Steels

AU - Holzweissig, M. J.

AU - Uslu, M. C.

AU - Lambers, H. G.

AU - Canadinc, D.

AU - Maier, H. J.

PY - 2013/5/10

Y1 - 2013/5/10

N2 - This paper presents a comparison of the macroscopic transformation strain evolution as a function of the bainite and martensite phase fractions in steels. Specifically, the evolution of anisotropic strain with phase fraction follows a linear trend for the martensitic transformation due to continuous stress-induced variant selection. In the case of bainitic transformation, the anisotropic strain evolves non-linearly owing to diffusion, minimizing the distortion around the bainitic sheaves and further promoting stress-induced variant selection at the early stages of the bainitic phase transformation. However, this effectiveness is reduced when the bainitic sheaves start constricting the growth of each other.

AB - This paper presents a comparison of the macroscopic transformation strain evolution as a function of the bainite and martensite phase fractions in steels. Specifically, the evolution of anisotropic strain with phase fraction follows a linear trend for the martensitic transformation due to continuous stress-induced variant selection. In the case of bainitic transformation, the anisotropic strain evolves non-linearly owing to diffusion, minimizing the distortion around the bainitic sheaves and further promoting stress-induced variant selection at the early stages of the bainitic phase transformation. However, this effectiveness is reduced when the bainitic sheaves start constricting the growth of each other.

KW - Anisotropic strain

KW - Austenite

KW - Bainite

KW - Martensite

KW - Phase transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902674467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21663831.2013.798748

DO - 10.1080/21663831.2013.798748

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902674467

VL - 1

SP - 141

EP - 147

JO - Materials Research Letters

JF - Materials Research Letters

SN - 2166-3831

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)