21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Helge Hannebauer
  • Thorsten Dullweber
  • Ulrike Baumann
  • Tom Falcon
  • Rolf Brendel

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Institute for Solar Energy Research (ISFH)
  • DEK Printing Solutions (ASMPT)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-679
Number of pages5
JournalPhysica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters
Volume8
Issue number8
Early online date3 Jun 2014
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Abstract

We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

Keywords

    Efficiency, Passivated emitter and rear cells, Silicon, Solar cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. / Hannebauer, Helge; Dullweber, Thorsten; Baumann, Ulrike et al.
In: Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters, Vol. 8, No. 8, 08.2014, p. 675-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hannebauer H, Dullweber T, Baumann U, Falcon T, Brendel R. 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters. 2014 Aug;8(8):675-679. Epub 2014 Jun 3. doi: 10.1002/pssr.201409190
Hannebauer, Helge ; Dullweber, Thorsten ; Baumann, Ulrike et al. / 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. In: Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. 8. pp. 675-679.
Download
@article{db8bf50b4d124e6c856336981a85f6a1,
title = "21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid",
abstract = "We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.",
keywords = "Efficiency, Passivated emitter and rear cells, Silicon, Solar cells",
author = "Helge Hannebauer and Thorsten Dullweber and Ulrike Baumann and Tom Falcon and Rolf Brendel",
note = "Acknowledgements We thank our colleagues at ISFH for support in solar cell processing. This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conserva-tion and Nuclear Safety within the R&D project HighScreen and by our industry partners SolarWorld, Heraeus, Singulus Tech-nologies, and Rena.",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1002/pssr.201409190",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "675--679",
journal = "Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters",
issn = "1862-6254",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid

AU - Hannebauer, Helge

AU - Dullweber, Thorsten

AU - Baumann, Ulrike

AU - Falcon, Tom

AU - Brendel, Rolf

N1 - Acknowledgements We thank our colleagues at ISFH for support in solar cell processing. This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conserva-tion and Nuclear Safety within the R&D project HighScreen and by our industry partners SolarWorld, Heraeus, Singulus Tech-nologies, and Rena.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

AB - We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

KW - Efficiency

KW - Passivated emitter and rear cells

KW - Silicon

KW - Solar cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905906224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pssr.201409190

DO - 10.1002/pssr.201409190

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905906224

VL - 8

SP - 675

EP - 679

JO - Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters

JF - Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters

SN - 1862-6254

IS - 8

ER -