Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungThe relevance of resource differences for research performance assessments: A contribution to the discussion within economics in Germany
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)53-75
Seitenumfang23
FachzeitschriftList Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik
Jahrgang48
Ausgabenummer1-2
Frühes Online-Datum16 März 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2022

Abstract

Research performance is not independent of the given conditions. However, performance comparisons often disregard these conditions. On the basis of personnel and financial resources provided by the government, we identify four groups of economics departments in Germany. For these groups, we compare doctoral degrees awarded, third-party funding, publications and the position in the ranking of the platform Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) as common research performance indicators. The results confirm, as expected, correlations between inputs and outputs. The endowment of professorships with scientific staff is particularly important. Top publications and high RePEc ranks are found mostly at larger departments with younger professors. Other departments nevertheless conduct highly cited research. The analysis underlines the necessity of differentiating in performance assessments and intends to encourage discussions on the further development of economics in Germany.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland. / Püttmann, Vitus; Thomsen, Stephan L.; Trunzer, Johannes.
in: List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, Jahrgang 48, Nr. 1-2, 06.2022, S. 53-75.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Püttmann V, Thomsen SL, Trunzer J. Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland. List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik. 2022 Jun;48(1-2):53-75. Epub 2022 Mär 16. doi: 10.1007/s41025-022-00238-7
Püttmann, Vitus ; Thomsen, Stephan L. ; Trunzer, Johannes. / Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche : Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland. in: List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik. 2022 ; Jahrgang 48, Nr. 1-2. S. 53-75.
Download
@article{5f25dd4f3cf24033b43e904f91c0cf96,
title = "Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden f{\"u}r Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag f{\"u}r die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland",
abstract = "Research performance is not independent of the given conditions. However, performance comparisons often disregard these conditions. On the basis of personnel and financial resources provided by the government, we identify four groups of economics departments in Germany. For these groups, we compare doctoral degrees awarded, third-party funding, publications and the position in the ranking of the platform Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) as common research performance indicators. The results confirm, as expected, correlations between inputs and outputs. The endowment of professorships with scientific staff is particularly important. Top publications and high RePEc ranks are found mostly at larger departments with younger professors. Other departments nevertheless conduct highly cited research. The analysis underlines the necessity of differentiating in performance assessments and intends to encourage discussions on the further development of economics in Germany.",
keywords = "Basic funding, Cluster analysis, Performance indicators, Ranking, Teaching load",
author = "Vitus P{\"u}ttmann and Thomsen, {Stephan L.} and Johannes Trunzer",
note = "Funding Information: Unser besonderer Dank gilt Eva Barl{\"o}sius, Bruno Frey, Olaf H{\"u}bler, Christian Zimmermann, Michael Leyer, Stephan Kaiser, Peter Letmathe und Burkhard Pedell f{\"u}r wertvolle Anmerkungen zu einer fr{\"u}heren Form des Manuskripts. Wir danken zudem Huu Son Bach Dang, Verena Mlinaric und Celine Schoe f{\"u}r ihre Unterst{\"u}tzung bei der Datenrecherche und -aufbereitung sowie einem/-r anonymen Gutachter/-in f{\"u}r wertvolle Hinweise. ",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s41025-022-00238-7",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "48",
pages = "53--75",
number = "1-2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche

T2 - Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland

AU - Püttmann, Vitus

AU - Thomsen, Stephan L.

AU - Trunzer, Johannes

N1 - Funding Information: Unser besonderer Dank gilt Eva Barlösius, Bruno Frey, Olaf Hübler, Christian Zimmermann, Michael Leyer, Stephan Kaiser, Peter Letmathe und Burkhard Pedell für wertvolle Anmerkungen zu einer früheren Form des Manuskripts. Wir danken zudem Huu Son Bach Dang, Verena Mlinaric und Celine Schoe für ihre Unterstützung bei der Datenrecherche und -aufbereitung sowie einem/-r anonymen Gutachter/-in für wertvolle Hinweise.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - Research performance is not independent of the given conditions. However, performance comparisons often disregard these conditions. On the basis of personnel and financial resources provided by the government, we identify four groups of economics departments in Germany. For these groups, we compare doctoral degrees awarded, third-party funding, publications and the position in the ranking of the platform Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) as common research performance indicators. The results confirm, as expected, correlations between inputs and outputs. The endowment of professorships with scientific staff is particularly important. Top publications and high RePEc ranks are found mostly at larger departments with younger professors. Other departments nevertheless conduct highly cited research. The analysis underlines the necessity of differentiating in performance assessments and intends to encourage discussions on the further development of economics in Germany.

AB - Research performance is not independent of the given conditions. However, performance comparisons often disregard these conditions. On the basis of personnel and financial resources provided by the government, we identify four groups of economics departments in Germany. For these groups, we compare doctoral degrees awarded, third-party funding, publications and the position in the ranking of the platform Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) as common research performance indicators. The results confirm, as expected, correlations between inputs and outputs. The endowment of professorships with scientific staff is particularly important. Top publications and high RePEc ranks are found mostly at larger departments with younger professors. Other departments nevertheless conduct highly cited research. The analysis underlines the necessity of differentiating in performance assessments and intends to encourage discussions on the further development of economics in Germany.

KW - Basic funding

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Performance indicators

KW - Ranking

KW - Teaching load

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126309577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s41025-022-00238-7

DO - 10.1007/s41025-022-00238-7

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:85126309577

VL - 48

SP - 53

EP - 75

JO - List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik

JF - List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik

SN - 0937-0862

IS - 1-2

ER -

Von denselben Autoren