Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Kai Ingwersen
  • Stephan L. Thomsen

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer2164
FachzeitschriftBMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Jahrgang24
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 9 Aug. 2024

Abstract

Background: This study explores the health status differences between migrants and native Germans, focusing on potential disparities in their workloads. Physical and mental workloads can negatively impact individual health. Since various occupations come with distinct health-related patterns, occupational selection may contribute to systematic health disparities among socio-economic groups. Given the generally poorer health of migrants, they might experience systematic workload differences overall. Methods: We suggest a conceptual framework for the empirical analysis based on the theory of health as a durable good with health consumption and health investment as key parameters. We quantify the role of work tasks, job requirements and working conditions on individual health based on detailed information from the BIBB/BAuA labour force survey 2012 and 2018. Results: The empirical results reveal that migrants, i.e. foreigners and German citizens with a migration background, have a higher perception of workload and related health afflictions within the same occupation. Native Germans, on the other hand, experience a higher burden by high job requirements, both physically and mentally. The findings imply heterogeneous health impacts of work for migrants and native Germans due to differences in health consumption. Conclusions: The analysis shows that migrants report worse health than natives, with stronger negative effects of work-related conditions on their health, both physically and mentally. Women, in general, report poorer health conditions than men. The findings emphasize the importance of promoting human capital to reduce economic and health disparities, though caution is advised regarding affirmative actions for migrants; further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and address these issues effectively.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany. / Ingwersen, Kai; Thomsen, Stephan L.
in: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 1, 2164, 09.08.2024.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Ingwersen K, Thomsen SL. Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):2164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19606-3
Ingwersen, Kai ; Thomsen, Stephan L. / Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany. in: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH. 2024 ; Jahrgang 24, Nr. 1.
Download
@article{aec7e1747ce0451899ba088d6ffdd4d0,
title = "Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany",
abstract = "Background: This study explores the health status differences between migrants and native Germans, focusing on potential disparities in their workloads. Physical and mental workloads can negatively impact individual health. Since various occupations come with distinct health-related patterns, occupational selection may contribute to systematic health disparities among socio-economic groups. Given the generally poorer health of migrants, they might experience systematic workload differences overall. Methods: We suggest a conceptual framework for the empirical analysis based on the theory of health as a durable good with health consumption and health investment as key parameters. We quantify the role of work tasks, job requirements and working conditions on individual health based on detailed information from the BIBB/BAuA labour force survey 2012 and 2018. Results: The empirical results reveal that migrants, i.e. foreigners and German citizens with a migration background, have a higher perception of workload and related health afflictions within the same occupation. Native Germans, on the other hand, experience a higher burden by high job requirements, both physically and mentally. The findings imply heterogeneous health impacts of work for migrants and native Germans due to differences in health consumption. Conclusions: The analysis shows that migrants report worse health than natives, with stronger negative effects of work-related conditions on their health, both physically and mentally. Women, in general, report poorer health conditions than men. The findings emphasize the importance of promoting human capital to reduce economic and health disparities, though caution is advised regarding affirmative actions for migrants; further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and address these issues effectively.",
keywords = "BIBB/BAuA labour force survey, Migrants, Self-reported health, Working conditions, Workload",
author = "Kai Ingwersen and Thomsen, {Stephan L.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-024-19606-3",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "BMC PUBLIC HEALTH",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workload disparities and their role in the health of migrants and natives in Germany

AU - Ingwersen, Kai

AU - Thomsen, Stephan L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/8/9

Y1 - 2024/8/9

N2 - Background: This study explores the health status differences between migrants and native Germans, focusing on potential disparities in their workloads. Physical and mental workloads can negatively impact individual health. Since various occupations come with distinct health-related patterns, occupational selection may contribute to systematic health disparities among socio-economic groups. Given the generally poorer health of migrants, they might experience systematic workload differences overall. Methods: We suggest a conceptual framework for the empirical analysis based on the theory of health as a durable good with health consumption and health investment as key parameters. We quantify the role of work tasks, job requirements and working conditions on individual health based on detailed information from the BIBB/BAuA labour force survey 2012 and 2018. Results: The empirical results reveal that migrants, i.e. foreigners and German citizens with a migration background, have a higher perception of workload and related health afflictions within the same occupation. Native Germans, on the other hand, experience a higher burden by high job requirements, both physically and mentally. The findings imply heterogeneous health impacts of work for migrants and native Germans due to differences in health consumption. Conclusions: The analysis shows that migrants report worse health than natives, with stronger negative effects of work-related conditions on their health, both physically and mentally. Women, in general, report poorer health conditions than men. The findings emphasize the importance of promoting human capital to reduce economic and health disparities, though caution is advised regarding affirmative actions for migrants; further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and address these issues effectively.

AB - Background: This study explores the health status differences between migrants and native Germans, focusing on potential disparities in their workloads. Physical and mental workloads can negatively impact individual health. Since various occupations come with distinct health-related patterns, occupational selection may contribute to systematic health disparities among socio-economic groups. Given the generally poorer health of migrants, they might experience systematic workload differences overall. Methods: We suggest a conceptual framework for the empirical analysis based on the theory of health as a durable good with health consumption and health investment as key parameters. We quantify the role of work tasks, job requirements and working conditions on individual health based on detailed information from the BIBB/BAuA labour force survey 2012 and 2018. Results: The empirical results reveal that migrants, i.e. foreigners and German citizens with a migration background, have a higher perception of workload and related health afflictions within the same occupation. Native Germans, on the other hand, experience a higher burden by high job requirements, both physically and mentally. The findings imply heterogeneous health impacts of work for migrants and native Germans due to differences in health consumption. Conclusions: The analysis shows that migrants report worse health than natives, with stronger negative effects of work-related conditions on their health, both physically and mentally. Women, in general, report poorer health conditions than men. The findings emphasize the importance of promoting human capital to reduce economic and health disparities, though caution is advised regarding affirmative actions for migrants; further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and address these issues effectively.

KW - BIBB/BAuA labour force survey

KW - Migrants

KW - Self-reported health

KW - Working conditions

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200864451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-024-19606-3

DO - 10.1186/s12889-024-19606-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 39123183

AN - SCOPUS:85200864451

VL - 24

JO - BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

JF - BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 2164

ER -