Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Thong Quoc Ho
  • Viet Ngu Hoang
  • Clevo Wilson
  • Trung Thanh Nguyen

Externe Organisationen

  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Tay Nguyen University (TNU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)114-125
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftEconomic Analysis and Policy
Jahrgang56
Frühes Online-Datum8 Sept. 2017
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2017

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers? / Ho, Thong Quoc; Hoang, Viet Ngu; Wilson, Clevo et al.
in: Economic Analysis and Policy, Jahrgang 56, 12.2017, S. 114-125.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Ho, TQ, Hoang, VN, Wilson, C & Nguyen, TT 2017, 'Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?', Economic Analysis and Policy, Jg. 56, S. 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002
Ho, T. Q., Hoang, V. N., Wilson, C., & Nguyen, T. T. (2017). Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers? Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002
Ho TQ, Hoang VN, Wilson C, Nguyen TT. Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers? Economic Analysis and Policy. 2017 Dez;56:114-125. Epub 2017 Sep 8. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002
Ho, Thong Quoc ; Hoang, Viet Ngu ; Wilson, Clevo et al. / Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?. in: Economic Analysis and Policy. 2017 ; Jahrgang 56. S. 114-125.
Download
@article{4c98bbb04a93418198c1662c06dc7a04,
title = "Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.",
keywords = "Efficiency, Farming synchronization, segregation, diversification, Input distance function, Vietnam's coffee production",
author = "Ho, {Thong Quoc} and Hoang, {Viet Ngu} and Clevo Wilson and Nguyen, {Trung Thanh}",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "114--125",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?

AU - Ho, Thong Quoc

AU - Hoang, Viet Ngu

AU - Wilson, Clevo

AU - Nguyen, Trung Thanh

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.

AB - This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.

KW - Efficiency

KW - Farming synchronization, segregation, diversification

KW - Input distance function

KW - Vietnam's coffee production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029389221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029389221

VL - 56

SP - 114

EP - 125

JO - Economic Analysis and Policy

JF - Economic Analysis and Policy

SN - 0313-5926

ER -