Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 114-125 |
Seitenumfang | 12 |
Fachzeitschrift | Economic Analysis and Policy |
Jahrgang | 56 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 8 Sept. 2017 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Dez. 2017 |
Abstract
This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre und Ökonometrie
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (sonstige)
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Economic Analysis and Policy, Jahrgang 56, 12.2017, S. 114-125.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Which farming systems are efficient for Vietnamese coffee farmers?
AU - Ho, Thong Quoc
AU - Hoang, Viet Ngu
AU - Wilson, Clevo
AU - Nguyen, Trung Thanh
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.
AB - This paper provides a comparative assessment of the productive efficiency of three common coffee growing systems in Vietnam: mono-cropping, synchronization and segregation. Results from an input distance function approach deliver several important findings. First, the average inefficiency level is estimated to be around 18% although inefficiency varies significantly between the three farming systems. Second, the synchronized system of growing coffee and the other industry crops is found to be the most efficient farming system. Third, coffee mono-cropping is less efficient than synchronized systems due to the presence of economies of scope between coffee and industrial crops. Fourth, the least efficient system is segregated cultivation of coffee and rice. Food insecurity is seen as a primary reason for coffee farmers diversifying into rice. These findings provide empirical evidence of agronomic benefits being derived from synchronized systems, and which are translated into higher productive efficiency. Policy options promoting synchronized farming systems may therefore enhance both economic and agronomic benefits.
KW - Efficiency
KW - Farming synchronization, segregation, diversification
KW - Input distance function
KW - Vietnam's coffee production
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029389221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029389221
VL - 56
SP - 114
EP - 125
JO - Economic Analysis and Policy
JF - Economic Analysis and Policy
SN - 0313-5926
ER -