Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1185–1206
Seitenumfang22
FachzeitschriftJournal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Jahrgang13
Ausgabenummer6-7
Frühes Online-Datum9 Mai 2023
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Okt. 2023

Abstract

In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism. / Wolniak, Marlene; Hofmeister, Benedikt; Jonscher, Clemens et al.
in: Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Jahrgang 13, Nr. 6-7, 10.2023, S. 1185–1206.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Wolniak M, Hofmeister B, Jonscher C, Fankhänel M, Loose A, Hübler C et al. Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. 2023 Okt;13(6-7):1185–1206. Epub 2023 Mai 9. doi: 10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9
Wolniak, Marlene ; Hofmeister, Benedikt ; Jonscher, Clemens et al. / Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism. in: Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. 2023 ; Jahrgang 13, Nr. 6-7. S. 1185–1206.
Download
@article{3121795313de4eb0b5078812c41b256f,
title = "Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism",
abstract = "In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.",
keywords = "Damage assessment, Experimental validation, FE model updating, Modal analysis, Numerical optimization",
author = "Marlene Wolniak and Benedikt Hofmeister and Clemens Jonscher and Matthias Fankh{\"a}nel and Ansgar Loose and Clemens H{\"u}bler and Raimund Rolfes",
note = "Funding Information: We greatly acknowledge the financial support of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (research project Multivariates Schadensmonitoring von Rotorbl{\"a}ttern, FKZ 0324157A) and Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (research project Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Komfort von dynamisch beanspruchten Holztragwerken im urbanen mehrgeschossigen Hochbau, AZ 34548/01-25) that enabled this work. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - SFB-1463-434502799.",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1185–1206",
number = "6-7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism

AU - Wolniak, Marlene

AU - Hofmeister, Benedikt

AU - Jonscher, Clemens

AU - Fankhänel, Matthias

AU - Loose, Ansgar

AU - Hübler, Clemens

AU - Rolfes, Raimund

N1 - Funding Information: We greatly acknowledge the financial support of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (research project Multivariates Schadensmonitoring von Rotorblättern, FKZ 0324157A) and Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (research project Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Komfort von dynamisch beanspruchten Holztragwerken im urbanen mehrgeschossigen Hochbau, AZ 34548/01-25) that enabled this work. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - SFB-1463-434502799.

PY - 2023/10

Y1 - 2023/10

N2 - In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.

AB - In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.

KW - Damage assessment

KW - Experimental validation

KW - FE model updating

KW - Modal analysis

KW - Numerical optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158861302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9

DO - 10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1185

EP - 1206

JO - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

JF - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

IS - 6-7

ER -

Von denselben Autoren