Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
UntertitelTechnical Papers
Herausgeber/-innenYuji Matsumoto, Rashmi Prasad
Herausgeber (Verlag)Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
Seiten1680-1691
Seitenumfang12
ISBN (Print)9784879747020
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2016
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Osaka, Japan
Dauer: 11 Dez. 201617 Dez. 2016

Abstract

Argument mining aims to determine the argumentative structure of texts. Although it is said to be crucial for future applications such as writing support systems, the benefit of its output has rarely been evaluated. This paper puts the analysis of the output into the focus. In particular, we investigate to what extent the mined structure can be leveraged to assess the argumentation quality of persuasive essays. We find insightful statistical patterns in the structure of essays. From these, we derive novel features that we evaluate in four argumentation-related essay scoring tasks. Our results reveal the benefit of argument mining for assessing argumentation quality. Among others, we improve the state of the art in scoring an essay's organization and its argument strength.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays. / Wachsmuth, Henning; Al-Khatib, Khalid; Stein, Benno.
Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Hrsg. / Yuji Matsumoto; Rashmi Prasad. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2016. S. 1680-1691.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Wachsmuth, H, Al-Khatib, K & Stein, B 2016, Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays. in Y Matsumoto & R Prasad (Hrsg.), Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), S. 1680-1691, 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Osaka, Japan, 11 Dez. 2016. <https://aclanthology.org/C16-1158>
Wachsmuth, H., Al-Khatib, K., & Stein, B. (2016). Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays. In Y. Matsumoto, & R. Prasad (Hrsg.), Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (S. 1680-1691). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://aclanthology.org/C16-1158
Wachsmuth H, Al-Khatib K, Stein B. Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays. in Matsumoto Y, Prasad R, Hrsg., Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 2016. S. 1680-1691
Wachsmuth, Henning ; Al-Khatib, Khalid ; Stein, Benno. / Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays. Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Hrsg. / Yuji Matsumoto ; Rashmi Prasad. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2016. S. 1680-1691
Download
@inproceedings{de4f4f6c543f4ed9a41dcb41dfd13735,
title = "Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays",
abstract = "Argument mining aims to determine the argumentative structure of texts. Although it is said to be crucial for future applications such as writing support systems, the benefit of its output has rarely been evaluated. This paper puts the analysis of the output into the focus. In particular, we investigate to what extent the mined structure can be leveraged to assess the argumentation quality of persuasive essays. We find insightful statistical patterns in the structure of essays. From these, we derive novel features that we evaluate in four argumentation-related essay scoring tasks. Our results reveal the benefit of argument mining for assessing argumentation quality. Among others, we improve the state of the art in scoring an essay's organization and its argument strength.",
author = "Henning Wachsmuth and Khalid Al-Khatib and Benno Stein",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
language = "English",
isbn = "9784879747020",
pages = "1680--1691",
editor = "Yuji Matsumoto and Rashmi Prasad",
booktitle = "Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)",
address = "Australia",
note = "26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2016 ; Conference date: 11-12-2016 Through 17-12-2016",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Al-Khatib, Khalid

AU - Stein, Benno

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Argument mining aims to determine the argumentative structure of texts. Although it is said to be crucial for future applications such as writing support systems, the benefit of its output has rarely been evaluated. This paper puts the analysis of the output into the focus. In particular, we investigate to what extent the mined structure can be leveraged to assess the argumentation quality of persuasive essays. We find insightful statistical patterns in the structure of essays. From these, we derive novel features that we evaluate in four argumentation-related essay scoring tasks. Our results reveal the benefit of argument mining for assessing argumentation quality. Among others, we improve the state of the art in scoring an essay's organization and its argument strength.

AB - Argument mining aims to determine the argumentative structure of texts. Although it is said to be crucial for future applications such as writing support systems, the benefit of its output has rarely been evaluated. This paper puts the analysis of the output into the focus. In particular, we investigate to what extent the mined structure can be leveraged to assess the argumentation quality of persuasive essays. We find insightful statistical patterns in the structure of essays. From these, we derive novel features that we evaluate in four argumentation-related essay scoring tasks. Our results reveal the benefit of argument mining for assessing argumentation quality. Among others, we improve the state of the art in scoring an essay's organization and its argument strength.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021679474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85021679474

SN - 9784879747020

SP - 1680

EP - 1691

BT - Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

A2 - Matsumoto, Yuji

A2 - Prasad, Rashmi

PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

T2 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2016

Y2 - 11 December 2016 through 17 December 2016

ER -

Von denselben Autoren