Transparency and strategic promotion: How court press releases facilitate judicial agenda-building in Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Philipp Meyer

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer102228
FachzeitschriftPublic relations review
Jahrgang48
Ausgabenummer4
Frühes Online-Datum28 Juli 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2022

Abstract

Press releases disseminate selected information and promote particular issues. Although several courts regularly publish press releases on decisions, it is unclear which policy issues are more likely to be promoted by courts. This study argues that courts publish press releases to increase transparency and promote politically contested issues strategically. Using original data on the German Federal Constitutional Court, it assesses the role of press releases for judicial agenda-setting. Policy issues in 7114 court decisions between 1998 and 2019 were coded through supervised text classification. The results show that the press releases cover a greater range of policy issues than the Court's decisions. They are more likely to be published for decisions that deal with politically contested issues. This study contributes to the policy agenda literature by adding a new case, the German Federal Constitutional Court, and court press releases as a new perspective.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Transparency and strategic promotion: How court press releases facilitate judicial agenda-building in Germany. / Meyer, Philipp.
in: Public relations review, Jahrgang 48, Nr. 4, 102228, 11.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{7d4d296fa81a4e368177d9bf42443176,
title = "Transparency and strategic promotion: How court press releases facilitate judicial agenda-building in Germany",
abstract = "Press releases disseminate selected information and promote particular issues. Although several courts regularly publish press releases on decisions, it is unclear which policy issues are more likely to be promoted by courts. This study argues that courts publish press releases to increase transparency and promote politically contested issues strategically. Using original data on the German Federal Constitutional Court, it assesses the role of press releases for judicial agenda-setting. Policy issues in 7114 court decisions between 1998 and 2019 were coded through supervised text classification. The results show that the press releases cover a greater range of policy issues than the Court's decisions. They are more likely to be published for decisions that deal with politically contested issues. This study contributes to the policy agenda literature by adding a new case, the German Federal Constitutional Court, and court press releases as a new perspective.",
keywords = "Agenda setting, Constitutional courts, Judicial politics, Political public relations, Supervised text classification",
author = "Philipp Meyer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102228",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
journal = "Public relations review",
issn = "0363-8111",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency and strategic promotion

T2 - How court press releases facilitate judicial agenda-building in Germany

AU - Meyer, Philipp

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2022/11

Y1 - 2022/11

N2 - Press releases disseminate selected information and promote particular issues. Although several courts regularly publish press releases on decisions, it is unclear which policy issues are more likely to be promoted by courts. This study argues that courts publish press releases to increase transparency and promote politically contested issues strategically. Using original data on the German Federal Constitutional Court, it assesses the role of press releases for judicial agenda-setting. Policy issues in 7114 court decisions between 1998 and 2019 were coded through supervised text classification. The results show that the press releases cover a greater range of policy issues than the Court's decisions. They are more likely to be published for decisions that deal with politically contested issues. This study contributes to the policy agenda literature by adding a new case, the German Federal Constitutional Court, and court press releases as a new perspective.

AB - Press releases disseminate selected information and promote particular issues. Although several courts regularly publish press releases on decisions, it is unclear which policy issues are more likely to be promoted by courts. This study argues that courts publish press releases to increase transparency and promote politically contested issues strategically. Using original data on the German Federal Constitutional Court, it assesses the role of press releases for judicial agenda-setting. Policy issues in 7114 court decisions between 1998 and 2019 were coded through supervised text classification. The results show that the press releases cover a greater range of policy issues than the Court's decisions. They are more likely to be published for decisions that deal with politically contested issues. This study contributes to the policy agenda literature by adding a new case, the German Federal Constitutional Court, and court press releases as a new perspective.

KW - Agenda setting

KW - Constitutional courts

KW - Judicial politics

KW - Political public relations

KW - Supervised text classification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135061007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102228

DO - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85135061007

VL - 48

JO - Public relations review

JF - Public relations review

SN - 0363-8111

IS - 4

M1 - 102228

ER -