Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: Systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Sifeng Bi
  • Kui He
  • Yanlin Zhao
  • David Moens
  • Michael Beer
  • Jingrui Zhang

Externe Organisationen

  • Beijing Institute of Technology
  • KU Leuven
  • The University of Liverpool
  • Tongji University
  • University of Science and Technology Beijing
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer108387
FachzeitschriftMechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Jahrgang165
Frühes Online-Datum2 Sept. 2021
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Feb. 2022

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: Systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification. / Bi, Sifeng; He, Kui; Zhao, Yanlin et al.
in: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Jahrgang 165, 108387, 15.02.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{536fab46176d439b934bc6386856c8af,
title = "Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: Systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification",
abstract = "This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.",
keywords = "NASA Challenge, Reliability analysis, Reliability-based optimization, Risk-based design, Uncertainty propagation, Uncertainty quantification",
author = "Sifeng Bi and Kui He and Yanlin Zhao and David Moens and Michael Beer and Jingrui Zhang",
note = "Funding Information: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 12102036 ) and the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars, which are greatly appreciated.",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108387",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
journal = "Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing",
issn = "0888-3270",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019

T2 - Systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification

AU - Bi, Sifeng

AU - He, Kui

AU - Zhao, Yanlin

AU - Moens, David

AU - Beer, Michael

AU - Zhang, Jingrui

N1 - Funding Information: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 12102036 ) and the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars, which are greatly appreciated.

PY - 2022/2/15

Y1 - 2022/2/15

N2 - This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.

AB - This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.

KW - NASA Challenge

KW - Reliability analysis

KW - Reliability-based optimization

KW - Risk-based design

KW - Uncertainty propagation

KW - Uncertainty quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114126227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108387

DO - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108387

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85114126227

VL - 165

JO - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

JF - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

SN - 0888-3270

M1 - 108387

ER -

Von denselben Autoren