Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Christian Albert
  • Carsten Neßhöver
  • Matthias Schröter
  • Heidi Wittmer
  • Aletta Bonn
  • Benjamin Burkhard
  • Jens Dauber
  • Ralf Döring
  • Christine Fürst
  • Karsten Grunewald
  • Dagmar Haase
  • Bernd Hansjürgens
  • Jennifer Hauck
  • Mandy Hinzmann
  • Thomas Koellner
  • Tobias Plieninger
  • Sven Erik Rabe
  • Irene Ring
  • Joachim H. Spangenberg
  • Ulrich Stachow
  • Henry Wüstemann
  • Christoph Görg

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt
  • Universität Leipzig
  • Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume, Wald und Fischerei
  • Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
  • Leibniz-Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung (IÖR) e.V.
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • CoKnow Consulting - Coproducing Knowledge for Sustainability
  • Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH
  • Universität Bayreuth
  • Københavns Universitet
  • ETH Zürich
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Technische Universität Berlin
  • Alpen-Adria-Universitat Klagenfurt (AAU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)27-33
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftGAIA
Jahrgang26
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2017

Abstract

We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany. / Albert, Christian; Neßhöver, Carsten; Schröter, Matthias et al.
in: GAIA, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 1, 2017, S. 27-33.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Albert, C, Neßhöver, C, Schröter, M, Wittmer, H, Bonn, A, Burkhard, B, Dauber, J, Döring, R, Fürst, C, Grunewald, K, Haase, D, Hansjürgens, B, Hauck, J, Hinzmann, M, Koellner, T, Plieninger, T, Rabe, SE, Ring, I, Spangenberg, JH, Stachow, U, Wüstemann, H & Görg, C 2017, 'Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany', GAIA, Jg. 26, Nr. 1, S. 27-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8
Albert, C., Neßhöver, C., Schröter, M., Wittmer, H., Bonn, A., Burkhard, B., Dauber, J., Döring, R., Fürst, C., Grunewald, K., Haase, D., Hansjürgens, B., Hauck, J., Hinzmann, M., Koellner, T., Plieninger, T., Rabe, S. E., Ring, I., Spangenberg, J. H., ... Görg, C. (2017). Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany. GAIA, 26(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8
Albert C, Neßhöver C, Schröter M, Wittmer H, Bonn A, Burkhard B et al. Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany. GAIA. 2017;26(1):27-33. doi: 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8
Albert, Christian ; Neßhöver, Carsten ; Schröter, Matthias et al. / Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany. in: GAIA. 2017 ; Jahrgang 26, Nr. 1. S. 27-33.
Download
@article{1757e223f1254bf396c33a967880aae6,
title = "Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany",
abstract = "We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.",
keywords = "Assessment, Biodiversity, Ecosystem services, Science-policy dialogue, Transdisciplinary approach",
author = "Christian Albert and Carsten Ne{\ss}h{\"o}ver and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Heidi Wittmer and Aletta Bonn and Benjamin Burkhard and Jens Dauber and Ralf D{\"o}ring and Christine F{\"u}rst and Karsten Grunewald and Dagmar Haase and Bernd Hansj{\"u}rgens and Jennifer Hauck and Mandy Hinzmann and Thomas Koellner and Tobias Plieninger and Rabe, {Sven Erik} and Irene Ring and Spangenberg, {Joachim H.} and Ulrich Stachow and Henry W{\"u}stemann and Christoph G{\"o}rg",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.14512/gaia.26.1.8",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "27--33",
journal = "GAIA",
issn = "0940-5550",
publisher = "Oekom Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany

AU - Albert, Christian

AU - Neßhöver, Carsten

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Wittmer, Heidi

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - Dauber, Jens

AU - Döring, Ralf

AU - Fürst, Christine

AU - Grunewald, Karsten

AU - Haase, Dagmar

AU - Hansjürgens, Bernd

AU - Hauck, Jennifer

AU - Hinzmann, Mandy

AU - Koellner, Thomas

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

AU - Rabe, Sven Erik

AU - Ring, Irene

AU - Spangenberg, Joachim H.

AU - Stachow, Ulrich

AU - Wüstemann, Henry

AU - Görg, Christoph

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

AB - We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

KW - Assessment

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Science-policy dialogue

KW - Transdisciplinary approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016390087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

DO - 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016390087

VL - 26

SP - 27

EP - 33

JO - GAIA

JF - GAIA

SN - 0940-5550

IS - 1

ER -

Von denselben Autoren

  1. Mapping and assessing marine ecosystem services supply in the Baltic Sea

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

  2. The influence of model choice and input data on pollinator habitat suitability in the Hannover region

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

  3. The Research Gap between Soil Biodiversity and Soil-Related Cultural Ecosystem Services

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

  4. Foundations for a national assessment of soil biodiversity

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

  5. Using co-creation to build knowledge on cultural ecosystem services: A tiered approach for enhanced regional economic development of Réunion Island

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review