To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science
ErscheinungsortAbu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Seiten39-51
Seitenumfang13
ISBN (elektronisch)9781959429203
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2022
VeranstaltungThe 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - Abu Dhabi, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate
Dauer: 7 Dez. 202211 Dez. 2022

Publikationsreihe

NameNLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022

Abstract

Gender bias may emerge from an unequal representation of agency and power, for example, by portraying women frequently as passive and powerless ("She accepted her future'') and men as proactive and powerful ("He chose his future''). When language models learn from respective texts, they may reproduce or even amplify the bias. An effective way to mitigate bias is to generate counterfactual sentences with opposite agency and power to the training. Recent work targeted agency-specific verbs from a lexicon to this end. We argue that this is insufficient, due to the interaction of agency and power and their dependence on context. In this paper, we thus develop a new rewriting model that identifies verbs with the desired agency and power in the context of the given sentence. The verbs' probability is then boosted to encourage the model to rewrite both connotations jointly. According to automatic metrics, our model effectively controls for power while being competitive in agency to the state of the art. In our evaluation, human annotators favored its counterfactuals in terms of both connotations, also deeming its meaning preservation better.

Zitieren

To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation. / Stahl, Maja; Spliethöver, Maximilian; Wachsmuth, Henning.
Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022. S. 39-51 (NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Stahl, M, Spliethöver, M & Wachsmuth, H 2022, To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation. in Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, S. 39-51, The 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Abu Dhabi, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, 7 Dez. 2022. <https://aclanthology.org/2022.nlpcss-1.6/>
Stahl, M., Spliethöver, M., & Wachsmuth, H. (2022). To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (S. 39-51). (NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022).. https://aclanthology.org/2022.nlpcss-1.6/
Stahl M, Spliethöver M, Wachsmuth H. To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation. in Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 2022. S. 39-51. (NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022).
Stahl, Maja ; Spliethöver, Maximilian ; Wachsmuth, Henning. / To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022. S. 39-51 (NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022).
Download
@inproceedings{48399e8886b443998c12f7af9c092dda,
title = "To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation",
abstract = "Gender bias may emerge from an unequal representation of agency and power, for example, by portraying women frequently as passive and powerless (“She accepted her future”) and men as proactive and powerful (“He chose his future”). When language models learn from respective texts, they may reproduce or even amplify the bias. An effective way to mitigate bias is to generate counterfactual sentences with opposite agency and power to the training. Recent work targeted agency-specific verbs from a lexicon to this end. We argue that this is insufficient, due to the interaction of agency and power and their dependence on context. In this paper, we thus develop a new rewriting model that identifies verbs with the desired agency and power in the context of the given sentence. The verbs{\textquoteright} probability is then boosted to encourage the model to rewrite both connotations jointly. According to automatic metrics, our model effectively controls for power while being competitive in agency to the state of the art. In our main evaluation, human annotators favored its counterfactuals in terms of both connotations, also deeming its meaning preservation better.",
author = "Maja Stahl and Maximilian Splieth{\"o}ver and Henning Wachsmuth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Association for Computational Linguistics.; The 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing ; Conference date: 07-12-2022 Through 11-12-2022",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
language = "English",
series = "NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022",
pages = "39--51",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - To Prefer or to Choose? Generating Agency and Power Counterfactuals Jointly for Gender Bias Mitigation

AU - Stahl, Maja

AU - Spliethöver, Maximilian

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Association for Computational Linguistics.

PY - 2022/11

Y1 - 2022/11

N2 - Gender bias may emerge from an unequal representation of agency and power, for example, by portraying women frequently as passive and powerless (“She accepted her future”) and men as proactive and powerful (“He chose his future”). When language models learn from respective texts, they may reproduce or even amplify the bias. An effective way to mitigate bias is to generate counterfactual sentences with opposite agency and power to the training. Recent work targeted agency-specific verbs from a lexicon to this end. We argue that this is insufficient, due to the interaction of agency and power and their dependence on context. In this paper, we thus develop a new rewriting model that identifies verbs with the desired agency and power in the context of the given sentence. The verbs’ probability is then boosted to encourage the model to rewrite both connotations jointly. According to automatic metrics, our model effectively controls for power while being competitive in agency to the state of the art. In our main evaluation, human annotators favored its counterfactuals in terms of both connotations, also deeming its meaning preservation better.

AB - Gender bias may emerge from an unequal representation of agency and power, for example, by portraying women frequently as passive and powerless (“She accepted her future”) and men as proactive and powerful (“He chose his future”). When language models learn from respective texts, they may reproduce or even amplify the bias. An effective way to mitigate bias is to generate counterfactual sentences with opposite agency and power to the training. Recent work targeted agency-specific verbs from a lexicon to this end. We argue that this is insufficient, due to the interaction of agency and power and their dependence on context. In this paper, we thus develop a new rewriting model that identifies verbs with the desired agency and power in the context of the given sentence. The verbs’ probability is then boosted to encourage the model to rewrite both connotations jointly. According to automatic metrics, our model effectively controls for power while being competitive in agency to the state of the art. In our main evaluation, human annotators favored its counterfactuals in terms of both connotations, also deeming its meaning preservation better.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154595235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - NLPCSS 2022 - 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science ,NLP+CSS, Held at the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022

SP - 39

EP - 51

BT - Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science

CY - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

T2 - The 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Y2 - 7 December 2022 through 11 December 2022

ER -

Von denselben Autoren