Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelTransferPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ozan Altan Altinok
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)116-128
FachzeitschriftChinese Journal of Contemporary Values
Jahrgang2022
Ausgabenummer04
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2022

Abstract

Social dimension of moral responsibility has started to gain more attention in moral philosophy,be it within the network of action theory,or any other meta-ethical domain.Although there are many social acts and therefore social dimensions of responsibility,I aim to indicate one aspect of sociality in our thinking and practice,particularly in our moral thinking,that is the thick concepts.In this work,I consider Vargas’ s concept moral ecology(2015,2018) as a tool to understand certain social aspects of moral responsibility,while claiming to extend his line of thinking in moral ecology by giving a more active role to the individual agent within the ecology that she is engaged in.I claim that when we understand the relationships between the agent and her surrounding ecology in a more complex,and under certain circumstances in a rather reciprocal way,we can have a better and more nuanced understanding of non-ideal moral landscapes that we are engaged in,while maintaining a certain kind of responsibility to the agents in their social environments.I will use the term niche construction and niche selection-concept that are already at use within the similar biological line of thought within action-to refer to such situations where agents are actively shaping their environments.

Zitieren

Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice. / Altinok, Ozan Altan.
in: Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values, Jahrgang 2022, Nr. 04, 2022, S. 116-128.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelTransferPeer-Review

Altinok OA. Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values. 2022;2022(04):116-128.
Altinok, Ozan Altan. / Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice. in: Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values. 2022 ; Jahrgang 2022, Nr. 04. S. 116-128.
Download
@article{5c7f84601d444c73ba321bf6a7553e05,
title = "Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice",
abstract = "Social dimension of moral responsibility has started to gain more attention in moral philosophy,be it within the network of action theory,or any other meta-ethical domain.Although there are many social acts and therefore social dimensions of responsibility,I aim to indicate one aspect of sociality in our thinking and practice,particularly in our moral thinking,that is the thick concepts.In this work,I consider Vargas{\textquoteright} s concept moral ecology(2015,2018) as a tool to understand certain social aspects of moral responsibility,while claiming to extend his line of thinking in moral ecology by giving a more active role to the individual agent within the ecology that she is engaged in.I claim that when we understand the relationships between the agent and her surrounding ecology in a more complex,and under certain circumstances in a rather reciprocal way,we can have a better and more nuanced understanding of non-ideal moral landscapes that we are engaged in,while maintaining a certain kind of responsibility to the agents in their social environments.I will use the term niche construction and niche selection-concept that are already at use within the similar biological line of thought within action-to refer to such situations where agents are actively shaping their environments.",
author = "Altinok, {Ozan Altan}",
year = "2022",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
pages = "116--128",
number = "04",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thick Concepts as Social Factors of Oppression on Moral Decisions and Injustice

AU - Altinok, Ozan Altan

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Social dimension of moral responsibility has started to gain more attention in moral philosophy,be it within the network of action theory,or any other meta-ethical domain.Although there are many social acts and therefore social dimensions of responsibility,I aim to indicate one aspect of sociality in our thinking and practice,particularly in our moral thinking,that is the thick concepts.In this work,I consider Vargas’ s concept moral ecology(2015,2018) as a tool to understand certain social aspects of moral responsibility,while claiming to extend his line of thinking in moral ecology by giving a more active role to the individual agent within the ecology that she is engaged in.I claim that when we understand the relationships between the agent and her surrounding ecology in a more complex,and under certain circumstances in a rather reciprocal way,we can have a better and more nuanced understanding of non-ideal moral landscapes that we are engaged in,while maintaining a certain kind of responsibility to the agents in their social environments.I will use the term niche construction and niche selection-concept that are already at use within the similar biological line of thought within action-to refer to such situations where agents are actively shaping their environments.

AB - Social dimension of moral responsibility has started to gain more attention in moral philosophy,be it within the network of action theory,or any other meta-ethical domain.Although there are many social acts and therefore social dimensions of responsibility,I aim to indicate one aspect of sociality in our thinking and practice,particularly in our moral thinking,that is the thick concepts.In this work,I consider Vargas’ s concept moral ecology(2015,2018) as a tool to understand certain social aspects of moral responsibility,while claiming to extend his line of thinking in moral ecology by giving a more active role to the individual agent within the ecology that she is engaged in.I claim that when we understand the relationships between the agent and her surrounding ecology in a more complex,and under certain circumstances in a rather reciprocal way,we can have a better and more nuanced understanding of non-ideal moral landscapes that we are engaged in,while maintaining a certain kind of responsibility to the agents in their social environments.I will use the term niche construction and niche selection-concept that are already at use within the similar biological line of thought within action-to refer to such situations where agents are actively shaping their environments.

M3 - Article

VL - 2022

SP - 116

EP - 128

JO - Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values

JF - Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values

IS - 04

ER -