The use of the analytical hierarchy process as a method of comparing innovation across regions: The examples of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ingo Liefner
  • Sabine Jessberger

Externe Organisationen

  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1188-1208
Seitenumfang21
FachzeitschriftEnvironment and Planning A
Jahrgang48
Ausgabenummer6
Frühes Online-Datum8 März 2016
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2016
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Comparing innovation across regions is challenging. Innovation processes and outcomes are shaped by different actors, interactions, and institutions. Regional contingencies complicate the comparison as evident from the existing approaches to explaining innovation across regions. Quantitative innovation measurement approaches may quantify differences between regions, but disregard regional contingencies. Qualitative, heuristic approaches may understand an individual region’s innovation history and culture, but cannot quantify differences between regions. This paper introduces an adapted version of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to fill this methodological void. It shows that the AHP allows us both to consider regional contingency and to quantify differences between regions. This paper applies the AHP to compare innovation of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. It thus exemplifies how this method might be used for research and application in human geography, planning, regional science, and related fields.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The use of the analytical hierarchy process as a method of comparing innovation across regions: The examples of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. / Liefner, Ingo; Jessberger, Sabine.
in: Environment and Planning A, Jahrgang 48, Nr. 6, 06.2016, S. 1188-1208.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{69266a92eb0f463781359fdd403278c4,
title = "The use of the analytical hierarchy process as a method of comparing innovation across regions: The examples of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China",
abstract = "Comparing innovation across regions is challenging. Innovation processes and outcomes are shaped by different actors, interactions, and institutions. Regional contingencies complicate the comparison as evident from the existing approaches to explaining innovation across regions. Quantitative innovation measurement approaches may quantify differences between regions, but disregard regional contingencies. Qualitative, heuristic approaches may understand an individual region{\textquoteright}s innovation history and culture, but cannot quantify differences between regions. This paper introduces an adapted version of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to fill this methodological void. It shows that the AHP allows us both to consider regional contingency and to quantify differences between regions. This paper applies the AHP to compare innovation of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. It thus exemplifies how this method might be used for research and application in human geography, planning, regional science, and related fields.",
keywords = "Analytical hierarchy process, China, equipment manufacturing industry, innovation, regional contingency",
author = "Ingo Liefner and Sabine Jessberger",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/0308518X16636886",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1188--1208",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the analytical hierarchy process as a method of comparing innovation across regions

T2 - The examples of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China

AU - Liefner, Ingo

AU - Jessberger, Sabine

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Comparing innovation across regions is challenging. Innovation processes and outcomes are shaped by different actors, interactions, and institutions. Regional contingencies complicate the comparison as evident from the existing approaches to explaining innovation across regions. Quantitative innovation measurement approaches may quantify differences between regions, but disregard regional contingencies. Qualitative, heuristic approaches may understand an individual region’s innovation history and culture, but cannot quantify differences between regions. This paper introduces an adapted version of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to fill this methodological void. It shows that the AHP allows us both to consider regional contingency and to quantify differences between regions. This paper applies the AHP to compare innovation of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. It thus exemplifies how this method might be used for research and application in human geography, planning, regional science, and related fields.

AB - Comparing innovation across regions is challenging. Innovation processes and outcomes are shaped by different actors, interactions, and institutions. Regional contingencies complicate the comparison as evident from the existing approaches to explaining innovation across regions. Quantitative innovation measurement approaches may quantify differences between regions, but disregard regional contingencies. Qualitative, heuristic approaches may understand an individual region’s innovation history and culture, but cannot quantify differences between regions. This paper introduces an adapted version of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to fill this methodological void. It shows that the AHP allows us both to consider regional contingency and to quantify differences between regions. This paper applies the AHP to compare innovation of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. It thus exemplifies how this method might be used for research and application in human geography, planning, regional science, and related fields.

KW - Analytical hierarchy process

KW - China

KW - equipment manufacturing industry

KW - innovation

KW - regional contingency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968919999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0308518X16636886

DO - 10.1177/0308518X16636886

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84968919999

VL - 48

SP - 1188

EP - 1208

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 6

ER -