The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Barbara Demi
  • Tobias Ortmaier
  • Ulrich Seibold

Externe Organisationen

  • Technische Universität München (TUM)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR) Standort Oberpfaffenhofen
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksHAVE 2005
UntertitelIEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications
Seiten33-38
Seitenumfang6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2005
Extern publiziertJa
VeranstaltungHAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications - Ottawa, ON, Kanada
Dauer: 1 Okt. 20052 Okt. 2005

Publikationsreihe

NameHAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications
Band2005

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) characterizes a sophisticated operation technique in which long instruments are inserted into the patient through small incisions, Though providing crucial benefits compared to open surgery (i.e. reduced tissue traumatization) it is also faced with a number of disadvantages. One of the major problems is that the operating tissue cannot be palpated any more and that appearing contact forces can hardly be sensed, To overcome some of the drawbacks minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) constitutes a promising approach. Due to the remote control the operating instruments can be equipped with miniaturized force/torque sensors and thus the appearing contact forces can be displayed to the surgeon. As the development of senseorized surgical devices is challenging there are no commercially available robotic systems which provide kinesthetic feedback currently. In this work a prototypical force reflecting MIRS system is presented and the importance of kinesthetic feedback is evaluated empirically. Based on the results of a psychophysical pre-experiment a representative dissection task was realized which was accomplished by 25 surgeons. The study revealed that robot assisted surgery is actually suited to reduce unintentional injuries when appropriate force feedback is available, although it has to be mentioned that the operating time increased compared to a manual intervention. Further interesting insights were gained by a qualitative video analysis which revealed that robotic surgery affords acquisition instead of manual surgical skill transfer. Especially experienced surgeons have to get accustomed to a more continuous working style.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. / Demi, Barbara; Ortmaier, Tobias; Seibold, Ulrich.
HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications. 2005. S. 33-38 1545648 (HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications; Band 2005).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Demi, B, Ortmaier, T & Seibold, U 2005, The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. in HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications., 1545648, HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications, Bd. 2005, S. 33-38, HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications, Ottawa, ON, Kanada, 1 Okt. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648
Demi, B., Ortmaier, T., & Seibold, U. (2005). The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. In HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (S. 33-38). Artikel 1545648 (HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications; Band 2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648
Demi B, Ortmaier T, Seibold U. The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. in HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications. 2005. S. 33-38. 1545648. (HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications). doi: 10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648
Demi, Barbara ; Ortmaier, Tobias ; Seibold, Ulrich. / The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications. 2005. S. 33-38 (HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications).
Download
@inproceedings{a3814f459afc44c1886fc0322c95d4bc,
title = "The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery",
abstract = "Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) characterizes a sophisticated operation technique in which long instruments are inserted into the patient through small incisions, Though providing crucial benefits compared to open surgery (i.e. reduced tissue traumatization) it is also faced with a number of disadvantages. One of the major problems is that the operating tissue cannot be palpated any more and that appearing contact forces can hardly be sensed, To overcome some of the drawbacks minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) constitutes a promising approach. Due to the remote control the operating instruments can be equipped with miniaturized force/torque sensors and thus the appearing contact forces can be displayed to the surgeon. As the development of senseorized surgical devices is challenging there are no commercially available robotic systems which provide kinesthetic feedback currently. In this work a prototypical force reflecting MIRS system is presented and the importance of kinesthetic feedback is evaluated empirically. Based on the results of a psychophysical pre-experiment a representative dissection task was realized which was accomplished by 25 surgeons. The study revealed that robot assisted surgery is actually suited to reduce unintentional injuries when appropriate force feedback is available, although it has to be mentioned that the operating time increased compared to a manual intervention. Further interesting insights were gained by a qualitative video analysis which revealed that robotic surgery affords acquisition instead of manual surgical skill transfer. Especially experienced surgeons have to get accustomed to a more continuous working style.",
keywords = "Haptic feedback, Minimally invasive robotic surgery, Psychophysical evaluation, Telemanipulation",
author = "Barbara Demi and Tobias Ortmaier and Ulrich Seibold",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648",
language = "English",
isbn = "0780393775",
series = "HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications",
pages = "33--38",
booktitle = "HAVE 2005",
note = "HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications ; Conference date: 01-10-2005 Through 02-10-2005",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery

AU - Demi, Barbara

AU - Ortmaier, Tobias

AU - Seibold, Ulrich

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) characterizes a sophisticated operation technique in which long instruments are inserted into the patient through small incisions, Though providing crucial benefits compared to open surgery (i.e. reduced tissue traumatization) it is also faced with a number of disadvantages. One of the major problems is that the operating tissue cannot be palpated any more and that appearing contact forces can hardly be sensed, To overcome some of the drawbacks minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) constitutes a promising approach. Due to the remote control the operating instruments can be equipped with miniaturized force/torque sensors and thus the appearing contact forces can be displayed to the surgeon. As the development of senseorized surgical devices is challenging there are no commercially available robotic systems which provide kinesthetic feedback currently. In this work a prototypical force reflecting MIRS system is presented and the importance of kinesthetic feedback is evaluated empirically. Based on the results of a psychophysical pre-experiment a representative dissection task was realized which was accomplished by 25 surgeons. The study revealed that robot assisted surgery is actually suited to reduce unintentional injuries when appropriate force feedback is available, although it has to be mentioned that the operating time increased compared to a manual intervention. Further interesting insights were gained by a qualitative video analysis which revealed that robotic surgery affords acquisition instead of manual surgical skill transfer. Especially experienced surgeons have to get accustomed to a more continuous working style.

AB - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) characterizes a sophisticated operation technique in which long instruments are inserted into the patient through small incisions, Though providing crucial benefits compared to open surgery (i.e. reduced tissue traumatization) it is also faced with a number of disadvantages. One of the major problems is that the operating tissue cannot be palpated any more and that appearing contact forces can hardly be sensed, To overcome some of the drawbacks minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) constitutes a promising approach. Due to the remote control the operating instruments can be equipped with miniaturized force/torque sensors and thus the appearing contact forces can be displayed to the surgeon. As the development of senseorized surgical devices is challenging there are no commercially available robotic systems which provide kinesthetic feedback currently. In this work a prototypical force reflecting MIRS system is presented and the importance of kinesthetic feedback is evaluated empirically. Based on the results of a psychophysical pre-experiment a representative dissection task was realized which was accomplished by 25 surgeons. The study revealed that robot assisted surgery is actually suited to reduce unintentional injuries when appropriate force feedback is available, although it has to be mentioned that the operating time increased compared to a manual intervention. Further interesting insights were gained by a qualitative video analysis which revealed that robotic surgery affords acquisition instead of manual surgical skill transfer. Especially experienced surgeons have to get accustomed to a more continuous working style.

KW - Haptic feedback

KW - Minimally invasive robotic surgery

KW - Psychophysical evaluation

KW - Telemanipulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845501874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648

DO - 10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545648

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:33845501874

SN - 0780393775

SN - 9780780393776

T3 - HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications

SP - 33

EP - 38

BT - HAVE 2005

T2 - HAVE 2005: IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications

Y2 - 1 October 2005 through 2 October 2005

ER -