Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 473-481 |
| Seitenumfang | 9 |
| Fachzeitschrift | AI and Society |
| Jahrgang | 31 |
| Ausgabenummer | 4 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 28 Okt. 2015 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Nov. 2016 |
Abstract
The recent development of robotics poses new challenges for the legislature as well as for jurisprudence. Especially, the ascription of responsibility to a specific individual becomes more difficult when confronted with an autonomous, learning and decision-making robot. A discussion about how to solve the problems of the wronged party having to prove the cause of the damage and the person responsible for it has to take place. One possible solution could be to ascribe a specific legal status to autonomous machines, similar to the status of legal persons (corporations). Discussing responsibility in this context should also include the question of the consequences of us intentionally handing over decision-making onto machines. This transfer as well as the development of robotics as such will have repercussions on the normative concepts our society is based upon. The space for these changes has to be created consciously.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Geisteswissenschaftliche Fächer (insg.)
- Philosophie
- Informatik (insg.)
- Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion
- Informatik (insg.)
- Artificial intelligence
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: AI and Society, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 4, 11.2016, S. 473-481.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics
AU - Beck, Susanne
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015, Springer-Verlag London.
PY - 2016/11
Y1 - 2016/11
N2 - The recent development of robotics poses new challenges for the legislature as well as for jurisprudence. Especially, the ascription of responsibility to a specific individual becomes more difficult when confronted with an autonomous, learning and decision-making robot. A discussion about how to solve the problems of the wronged party having to prove the cause of the damage and the person responsible for it has to take place. One possible solution could be to ascribe a specific legal status to autonomous machines, similar to the status of legal persons (corporations). Discussing responsibility in this context should also include the question of the consequences of us intentionally handing over decision-making onto machines. This transfer as well as the development of robotics as such will have repercussions on the normative concepts our society is based upon. The space for these changes has to be created consciously.
AB - The recent development of robotics poses new challenges for the legislature as well as for jurisprudence. Especially, the ascription of responsibility to a specific individual becomes more difficult when confronted with an autonomous, learning and decision-making robot. A discussion about how to solve the problems of the wronged party having to prove the cause of the damage and the person responsible for it has to take place. One possible solution could be to ascribe a specific legal status to autonomous machines, similar to the status of legal persons (corporations). Discussing responsibility in this context should also include the question of the consequences of us intentionally handing over decision-making onto machines. This transfer as well as the development of robotics as such will have repercussions on the normative concepts our society is based upon. The space for these changes has to be created consciously.
KW - Damages
KW - Electronic personhood
KW - Legal status
KW - Normative concepts
KW - Responsibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945584671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00146-015-0624-5
DO - 10.1007/s00146-015-0624-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84945584671
VL - 31
SP - 473
EP - 481
JO - AI and Society
JF - AI and Society
SN - 0951-5666
IS - 4
ER -