The J-Integral Method Compared to the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Standard to Calculate Stress Intensity Factor (SIF): Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Application with Uncertainty Quantification

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Hamid Ghasemi
  • Khader M. Hamdia

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Arak University of Technology
  • Ministry of Science, Research and Technology Islamic Republic of Iran (MRST)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)4643-4654
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftArabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Jahrgang49
Ausgabenummer4
Frühes Online-Datum14 Aug. 2023
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2024

Abstract

Leak-before-break (LBB), as a part of the fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment, is a critical requirement to ensure pressure vessel structural integrity LBB generally means a leak will be detected before an in-service catastrophic failure occurs. Despite some established procedures in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 or BS 7910 standards, performing a robust LBB assessment is not a regular and straightforward practice in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. A mix of different sources has been commonly used in case studies, which could lead to non-consistent results. This paper presents, firstly, a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) within an LBB assessment framework for a cylindrical pressure vessel. The stress intensity factor (SIF) of a defective vessel with a through-thickness crack is numerically calculated using the J-integral method and based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. The accuracy of the numerical solutions is then compared with the analytical results proposed by the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard. The maximum (limiting) through-thickness flaw size, which will not grow to an intolerable size during the vessel service life, is calculated analytically and numerically. Afterward, errors in measuring the exact length of the crack during inspections, the internal pressure fluctuations due to the vessel's operational conditions, and uncertainties in characterizing the mechanical properties of the base material, including its minimum yield strength and toughness, are quantified. A reliability analysis is finally evaluated to assess the probability of failure considering these uncertainties.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The J-Integral Method Compared to the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Standard to Calculate Stress Intensity Factor (SIF): Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Application with Uncertainty Quantification. / Ghasemi, Hamid; Hamdia, Khader M.
in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Jahrgang 49, Nr. 4, 04.2024, S. 4643-4654.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{d82a87609fe74dd1ba0400a4248fde7a,
title = "The J-Integral Method Compared to the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Standard to Calculate Stress Intensity Factor (SIF): Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Application with Uncertainty Quantification",
abstract = "Leak-before-break (LBB), as a part of the fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment, is a critical requirement to ensure pressure vessel structural integrity LBB generally means a leak will be detected before an in-service catastrophic failure occurs. Despite some established procedures in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 or BS 7910 standards, performing a robust LBB assessment is not a regular and straightforward practice in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. A mix of different sources has been commonly used in case studies, which could lead to non-consistent results. This paper presents, firstly, a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) within an LBB assessment framework for a cylindrical pressure vessel. The stress intensity factor (SIF) of a defective vessel with a through-thickness crack is numerically calculated using the J-integral method and based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. The accuracy of the numerical solutions is then compared with the analytical results proposed by the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard. The maximum (limiting) through-thickness flaw size, which will not grow to an intolerable size during the vessel service life, is calculated analytically and numerically. Afterward, errors in measuring the exact length of the crack during inspections, the internal pressure fluctuations due to the vessel's operational conditions, and uncertainties in characterizing the mechanical properties of the base material, including its minimum yield strength and toughness, are quantified. A reliability analysis is finally evaluated to assess the probability of failure considering these uncertainties.",
keywords = "Crack, Fitness-for-service, J-integral, LBB, Leak-before-break, Uncertainty quantification",
author = "Hamid Ghasemi and Hamdia, {Khader M.}",
note = "Funding Information: This work has been supported by the Center for International Scientific Studies and Collaborations (CISSC), Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran. Khader M. Hamdia thanks the support provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Projektnummer 492535144. ",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s13369-023-08138-4",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "4643--4654",
journal = "Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering",
issn = "2193-567X",
publisher = "Springer Berlin",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The J-Integral Method Compared to the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Standard to Calculate Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

T2 - Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Application with Uncertainty Quantification

AU - Ghasemi, Hamid

AU - Hamdia, Khader M.

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been supported by the Center for International Scientific Studies and Collaborations (CISSC), Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran. Khader M. Hamdia thanks the support provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Projektnummer 492535144.

PY - 2024/4

Y1 - 2024/4

N2 - Leak-before-break (LBB), as a part of the fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment, is a critical requirement to ensure pressure vessel structural integrity LBB generally means a leak will be detected before an in-service catastrophic failure occurs. Despite some established procedures in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 or BS 7910 standards, performing a robust LBB assessment is not a regular and straightforward practice in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. A mix of different sources has been commonly used in case studies, which could lead to non-consistent results. This paper presents, firstly, a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) within an LBB assessment framework for a cylindrical pressure vessel. The stress intensity factor (SIF) of a defective vessel with a through-thickness crack is numerically calculated using the J-integral method and based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. The accuracy of the numerical solutions is then compared with the analytical results proposed by the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard. The maximum (limiting) through-thickness flaw size, which will not grow to an intolerable size during the vessel service life, is calculated analytically and numerically. Afterward, errors in measuring the exact length of the crack during inspections, the internal pressure fluctuations due to the vessel's operational conditions, and uncertainties in characterizing the mechanical properties of the base material, including its minimum yield strength and toughness, are quantified. A reliability analysis is finally evaluated to assess the probability of failure considering these uncertainties.

AB - Leak-before-break (LBB), as a part of the fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment, is a critical requirement to ensure pressure vessel structural integrity LBB generally means a leak will be detected before an in-service catastrophic failure occurs. Despite some established procedures in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 or BS 7910 standards, performing a robust LBB assessment is not a regular and straightforward practice in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. A mix of different sources has been commonly used in case studies, which could lead to non-consistent results. This paper presents, firstly, a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) within an LBB assessment framework for a cylindrical pressure vessel. The stress intensity factor (SIF) of a defective vessel with a through-thickness crack is numerically calculated using the J-integral method and based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. The accuracy of the numerical solutions is then compared with the analytical results proposed by the API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard. The maximum (limiting) through-thickness flaw size, which will not grow to an intolerable size during the vessel service life, is calculated analytically and numerically. Afterward, errors in measuring the exact length of the crack during inspections, the internal pressure fluctuations due to the vessel's operational conditions, and uncertainties in characterizing the mechanical properties of the base material, including its minimum yield strength and toughness, are quantified. A reliability analysis is finally evaluated to assess the probability of failure considering these uncertainties.

KW - Crack

KW - Fitness-for-service

KW - J-integral

KW - LBB

KW - Leak-before-break

KW - Uncertainty quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168084174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13369-023-08138-4

DO - 10.1007/s13369-023-08138-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85168084174

VL - 49

SP - 4643

EP - 4654

JO - Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

JF - Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

SN - 2193-567X

IS - 4

ER -