The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Übersichtsarbeit › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Jochen Gläser
  • Ash Mitchell
  • Guido Buenstorf
  • David Robin Hopf
  • Lara Hubenschmid
  • Melike Janßen
  • Grit Laudel
  • Uwe Schimank
  • Marlene Stoll
  • Torsten Wilholt
  • Lothar Zechlin
  • Klaus Lieb

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Technische Universität Berlin
  • Universität Wien
  • Universität Kassel
  • Leibniz Institute für Resilienzforschung (LIR)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW)
  • Universität Bremen
  • Universität Duisburg-Essen
  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)105-138
Seitenumfang34
FachzeitschriftMinerva
Jahrgang60
Ausgabenummer1
Frühes Online-Datum8 Sept. 2021
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2022

Abstract

The independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have been studied by the corresponding disciplines and are increasingly the subject of reflexive discourses of scientific communities. Unfortunately, problems of independence are usually framed in disciplinary contexts without due consideration of other perspectives’ relevance or possible contributions. To overcome these limitations, we review disciplinary perspectives and findings on the independence of research and identify interdisciplinary prospects that could inform a research programme.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. / Gläser, Jochen; Mitchell, Ash; Buenstorf, Guido et al.
in: Minerva, Jahrgang 60, Nr. 1, 03.2022, S. 105-138.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Übersichtsarbeit › Forschung › Peer-Review

Gläser, J, Mitchell, A, Buenstorf, G, Hopf, DR, Hubenschmid, L, Janßen, M, Laudel, G, Schimank, U, Stoll, M, Wilholt, T, Zechlin, L & Lieb, K 2022, 'The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects', Minerva, Jg. 60, Nr. 1, S. 105-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8
Gläser, J., Mitchell, A., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D. R., Hubenschmid, L., Janßen, M., Laudel, G., Schimank, U., Stoll, M., Wilholt, T., Zechlin, L., & Lieb, K. (2022). The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. Minerva, 60(1), 105-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8
Gläser J, Mitchell A, Buenstorf G, Hopf DR, Hubenschmid L, Janßen M et al. The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. Minerva. 2022 Mär;60(1):105-138. Epub 2021 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8
Gläser, Jochen ; Mitchell, Ash ; Buenstorf, Guido et al. / The Independence of Research : A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. in: Minerva. 2022 ; Jahrgang 60, Nr. 1. S. 105-138.
Download
@article{86b047300abe4e28bea674b981db3aa6,
title = "The Independence of Research: A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects",
abstract = "The independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have been studied by the corresponding disciplines and are increasingly the subject of reflexive discourses of scientific communities. Unfortunately, problems of independence are usually framed in disciplinary contexts without due consideration of other perspectives{\textquoteright} relevance or possible contributions. To overcome these limitations, we review disciplinary perspectives and findings on the independence of research and identify interdisciplinary prospects that could inform a research programme.",
keywords = "Academy-industry collaboration, Autonomy, Competition, Conflict of interest, Epistemic independence, Freedom of science, Science in dictatorships, Social epistemology",
author = "Jochen Gl{\"a}ser and Ash Mitchell and Guido Buenstorf and Hopf, {David Robin} and Lara Hubenschmid and Melike Jan{\ss}en and Grit Laudel and Uwe Schimank and Marlene Stoll and Torsten Wilholt and Lothar Zechlin and Klaus Lieb",
note = "Funding Information: Research for this paper was supported by the Volkswagen Foundation (Grant 91498). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "105--138",
journal = "Minerva",
issn = "0026-4695",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Independence of Research

T2 - A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects

AU - Gläser, Jochen

AU - Mitchell, Ash

AU - Buenstorf, Guido

AU - Hopf, David Robin

AU - Hubenschmid, Lara

AU - Janßen, Melike

AU - Laudel, Grit

AU - Schimank, Uwe

AU - Stoll, Marlene

AU - Wilholt, Torsten

AU - Zechlin, Lothar

AU - Lieb, Klaus

N1 - Funding Information: Research for this paper was supported by the Volkswagen Foundation (Grant 91498). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - The independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have been studied by the corresponding disciplines and are increasingly the subject of reflexive discourses of scientific communities. Unfortunately, problems of independence are usually framed in disciplinary contexts without due consideration of other perspectives’ relevance or possible contributions. To overcome these limitations, we review disciplinary perspectives and findings on the independence of research and identify interdisciplinary prospects that could inform a research programme.

AB - The independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have been studied by the corresponding disciplines and are increasingly the subject of reflexive discourses of scientific communities. Unfortunately, problems of independence are usually framed in disciplinary contexts without due consideration of other perspectives’ relevance or possible contributions. To overcome these limitations, we review disciplinary perspectives and findings on the independence of research and identify interdisciplinary prospects that could inform a research programme.

KW - Academy-industry collaboration

KW - Autonomy

KW - Competition

KW - Conflict of interest

KW - Epistemic independence

KW - Freedom of science

KW - Science in dictatorships

KW - Social epistemology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114422098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8

DO - 10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8

M3 - Review article

VL - 60

SP - 105

EP - 138

JO - Minerva

JF - Minerva

SN - 0026-4695

IS - 1

ER -