The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Hendrik Hansmeier
  • Henning Kroll

Externe Organisationen

  • Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)125-143
Seitenumfang19
FachzeitschriftZFW - Advances in Economic Geography
Jahrgang68
Ausgabenummer2
Frühes Online-Datum7 März 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 28 Okt. 2024

Abstract

The need to address environmental challenges through innovation-based transformative change has become more urgent than ever and the spatial dimension of pathways towards sustainability has attracted increasing scholarly interest. Over the last decade, research on environmentally oriented innovation has entered the geographical discourse from different directions. This paper starts with the premise that, among other contributions, two main directions of research can be identified within the current geographical discourse that do not yet interface much – a broad, yet conceptually more traditional debate on eco-innovation and a newer discourse around socio-technical transitions that adds a further perspective. Having justified this assumption by a short literature review, we perform a keyword-based literature search, which confirms that there are indeed two distinct bodies of literature and few studies to date that integrate features from both fields. Following this, an in-depth review of the sources clarifies the differences in perspective and the common object of analysis of the basic systemic elements of actors, institutions and technologies. While this juxtaposition illustrates why the two fields of research have hardly cross-fertilised each other so far, it also shows that they are in substance far from irreconcilable. On the contrary, the nuanced synthesis of research findings reveals numerous complementarities that constitute promising avenues for future geographical research. These are considered necessary to improve the understanding of the geography of innovation-based transitions towards sustainability.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison. / Hansmeier, Hendrik; Kroll, Henning.
in: ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography, Jahrgang 68, Nr. 2, 28.10.2024, S. 125-143.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Hansmeier, H & Kroll, H 2024, 'The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison', ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography, Jg. 68, Nr. 2, S. 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2022-0010
Hansmeier, H., & Kroll, H. (2024). The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison. ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography, 68(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2022-0010
Hansmeier H, Kroll H. The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison. ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography. 2024 Okt 28;68(2):125-143. Epub 2024 Mär 7. doi: 10.1515/zfw-2022-0010
Hansmeier, Hendrik ; Kroll, Henning. / The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions : a systematic comparison. in: ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography. 2024 ; Jahrgang 68, Nr. 2. S. 125-143.
Download
@article{727e05755390428ca930d3d756005839,
title = "The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: a systematic comparison",
abstract = "The need to address environmental challenges through innovation-based transformative change has become more urgent than ever and the spatial dimension of pathways towards sustainability has attracted increasing scholarly interest. Over the last decade, research on environmentally oriented innovation has entered the geographical discourse from different directions. This paper starts with the premise that, among other contributions, two main directions of research can be identified within the current geographical discourse that do not yet interface much – a broad, yet conceptually more traditional debate on eco-innovation and a newer discourse around socio-technical transitions that adds a further perspective. Having justified this assumption by a short literature review, we perform a keyword-based literature search, which confirms that there are indeed two distinct bodies of literature and few studies to date that integrate features from both fields. Following this, an in-depth review of the sources clarifies the differences in perspective and the common object of analysis of the basic systemic elements of actors, institutions and technologies. While this juxtaposition illustrates why the two fields of research have hardly cross-fertilised each other so far, it also shows that they are in substance far from irreconcilable. On the contrary, the nuanced synthesis of research findings reveals numerous complementarities that constitute promising avenues for future geographical research. These are considered necessary to improve the understanding of the geography of innovation-based transitions towards sustainability.",
keywords = "actors, eco-innovations, geography, institutions, sustainability transitions, technologies",
author = "Hendrik Hansmeier and Henning Kroll",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter.",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1515/zfw-2022-0010",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "125--143",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions

T2 - a systematic comparison

AU - Hansmeier, Hendrik

AU - Kroll, Henning

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter.

PY - 2024/10/28

Y1 - 2024/10/28

N2 - The need to address environmental challenges through innovation-based transformative change has become more urgent than ever and the spatial dimension of pathways towards sustainability has attracted increasing scholarly interest. Over the last decade, research on environmentally oriented innovation has entered the geographical discourse from different directions. This paper starts with the premise that, among other contributions, two main directions of research can be identified within the current geographical discourse that do not yet interface much – a broad, yet conceptually more traditional debate on eco-innovation and a newer discourse around socio-technical transitions that adds a further perspective. Having justified this assumption by a short literature review, we perform a keyword-based literature search, which confirms that there are indeed two distinct bodies of literature and few studies to date that integrate features from both fields. Following this, an in-depth review of the sources clarifies the differences in perspective and the common object of analysis of the basic systemic elements of actors, institutions and technologies. While this juxtaposition illustrates why the two fields of research have hardly cross-fertilised each other so far, it also shows that they are in substance far from irreconcilable. On the contrary, the nuanced synthesis of research findings reveals numerous complementarities that constitute promising avenues for future geographical research. These are considered necessary to improve the understanding of the geography of innovation-based transitions towards sustainability.

AB - The need to address environmental challenges through innovation-based transformative change has become more urgent than ever and the spatial dimension of pathways towards sustainability has attracted increasing scholarly interest. Over the last decade, research on environmentally oriented innovation has entered the geographical discourse from different directions. This paper starts with the premise that, among other contributions, two main directions of research can be identified within the current geographical discourse that do not yet interface much – a broad, yet conceptually more traditional debate on eco-innovation and a newer discourse around socio-technical transitions that adds a further perspective. Having justified this assumption by a short literature review, we perform a keyword-based literature search, which confirms that there are indeed two distinct bodies of literature and few studies to date that integrate features from both fields. Following this, an in-depth review of the sources clarifies the differences in perspective and the common object of analysis of the basic systemic elements of actors, institutions and technologies. While this juxtaposition illustrates why the two fields of research have hardly cross-fertilised each other so far, it also shows that they are in substance far from irreconcilable. On the contrary, the nuanced synthesis of research findings reveals numerous complementarities that constitute promising avenues for future geographical research. These are considered necessary to improve the understanding of the geography of innovation-based transitions towards sustainability.

KW - actors

KW - eco-innovations

KW - geography

KW - institutions

KW - sustainability transitions

KW - technologies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187407370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/zfw-2022-0010

DO - 10.1515/zfw-2022-0010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85187407370

VL - 68

SP - 125

EP - 143

JO - ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography

JF - ZFW - Advances in Economic Geography

SN - 2748-1956

IS - 2

ER -