Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Robrecht P. van der Wel
  • Timothy Welsh
  • Anne Böckler

Externe Organisationen

  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Camden
  • University of Toronto
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1-6
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Jahrgang80
Ausgabenummer1
Frühes Online-Datum4 Dez. 2017
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Jan. 2018
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture. / van der Wel, Robrecht P.; Welsh, Timothy; Böckler, Anne.
in: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Jahrgang 80, Nr. 1, 01.2018, S. 1-6.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

van der Wel RP, Welsh T, Böckler A. Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2018 Jan;80(1):1-6. Epub 2017 Dez 4. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y
van der Wel, Robrecht P. ; Welsh, Timothy ; Böckler, Anne. / Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture. in: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2018 ; Jahrgang 80, Nr. 1. S. 1-6.
Download
@article{8eef540e8fbb4e109acbc5e315bb5012,
title = "Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture",
abstract = "The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.",
keywords = "Attention, Eye Movements: *Other, Gaze",
author = "{van der Wel}, {Robrecht P.} and Timothy Welsh and Anne B{\"o}ckler",
note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis. Funding Information: Acknowledgements This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture

AU - van der Wel, Robrecht P.

AU - Welsh, Timothy

AU - Böckler, Anne

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis. Funding Information: Acknowledgements This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.

AB - The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.

KW - Attention

KW - Eye Movements: Other

KW - Gaze

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036528043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y

DO - 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 29204867

AN - SCOPUS:85036528043

VL - 80

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 1

ER -