Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Sofie L. Valk
  • Boris C. Bernhardt
  • Anne Böckler
  • Philipp Kanske
  • Tania Singer

Externe Organisationen

  • Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
  • McGill University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)3388-3399
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftHuman brain mapping
Jahrgang37
Ausgabenummer10
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 4 Sept. 2016
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Humans have the ability to reflect upon their perception, thoughts, and actions, known as metacognition (MC). The brain basis of MC is incompletely understood, and it is debated whether MC on different processes is subserved by common or divergent networks. We combined behavioral phenotyping with multi-modal neuroimaging to investigate whether structural substrates of individual differences in MC on higher-order cognition (MC-C) are dissociable from those underlying MC on perceptual accuracy (MC-P). Motivated by conceptual work suggesting a link between MC and cognitive perspective taking, we furthermore tested for overlaps between MC substrates and mentalizing networks. In a large sample of healthy adults, individual differences in MC-C and MC-P did not correlate. MRI-based cortical thickness mapping revealed a structural basis of this independence, by showing that individual differences in MC-P related to right prefrontal cortical thickness, while MC-C scores correlated with measures in lateral prefrontal, temporo-parietal, and posterior midline regions. Surface-based superficial white matter diffusivity analysis revealed substrates resembling those seen for cortical thickness, confirming the divergence of both MC faculties using an independent imaging marker. Despite their specificity, substrates of MC-C and MC-P fell clearly within networks known to participate in mentalizing, confirmed by task-based fMRI in the same subjects, previous meta-analytical findings, and ad-hoc Neurosynth-based meta-analyses. Our integrative multi-method approach indicates domain-specific substrates of MC; despite their divergence, these nevertheless likely rely on component processes mediated by circuits also involved in mentalizing. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3388–3399, 2016.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network. / Valk, Sofie L.; Bernhardt, Boris C.; Böckler, Anne et al.
in: Human brain mapping, Jahrgang 37, Nr. 10, 04.09.2016, S. 3388-3399.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Valk SL, Bernhardt BC, Böckler A, Kanske P, Singer T. Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network. Human brain mapping. 2016 Sep 4;37(10):3388-3399. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23247
Valk, Sofie L. ; Bernhardt, Boris C. ; Böckler, Anne et al. / Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network. in: Human brain mapping. 2016 ; Jahrgang 37, Nr. 10. S. 3388-3399.
Download
@article{f9dc63e9dae046579b391a554bdc0922,
title = "Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network",
abstract = "Humans have the ability to reflect upon their perception, thoughts, and actions, known as metacognition (MC). The brain basis of MC is incompletely understood, and it is debated whether MC on different processes is subserved by common or divergent networks. We combined behavioral phenotyping with multi-modal neuroimaging to investigate whether structural substrates of individual differences in MC on higher-order cognition (MC-C) are dissociable from those underlying MC on perceptual accuracy (MC-P). Motivated by conceptual work suggesting a link between MC and cognitive perspective taking, we furthermore tested for overlaps between MC substrates and mentalizing networks. In a large sample of healthy adults, individual differences in MC-C and MC-P did not correlate. MRI-based cortical thickness mapping revealed a structural basis of this independence, by showing that individual differences in MC-P related to right prefrontal cortical thickness, while MC-C scores correlated with measures in lateral prefrontal, temporo-parietal, and posterior midline regions. Surface-based superficial white matter diffusivity analysis revealed substrates resembling those seen for cortical thickness, confirming the divergence of both MC faculties using an independent imaging marker. Despite their specificity, substrates of MC-C and MC-P fell clearly within networks known to participate in mentalizing, confirmed by task-based fMRI in the same subjects, previous meta-analytical findings, and ad-hoc Neurosynth-based meta-analyses. Our integrative multi-method approach indicates domain-specific substrates of MC; despite their divergence, these nevertheless likely rely on component processes mediated by circuits also involved in mentalizing. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3388–3399, 2016.",
keywords = "cognition, individual differences, interoceptive accuracy, metacognition, structural MRI, theory of mind",
author = "Valk, {Sofie L.} and Bernhardt, {Boris C.} and Anne B{\"o}ckler and Philipp Kanske and Tania Singer",
note = "Funding Information: The authors are thankful to the Department of Social Neurosciences for their support with the ReSource project.",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1002/hbm.23247",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "3388--3399",
journal = "Human brain mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substrates of Metacognition on Perception and Metacognition on Higher-order Cognition Relate to Different Subsystems of the Mentalizing Network

AU - Valk, Sofie L.

AU - Bernhardt, Boris C.

AU - Böckler, Anne

AU - Kanske, Philipp

AU - Singer, Tania

N1 - Funding Information: The authors are thankful to the Department of Social Neurosciences for their support with the ReSource project.

PY - 2016/9/4

Y1 - 2016/9/4

N2 - Humans have the ability to reflect upon their perception, thoughts, and actions, known as metacognition (MC). The brain basis of MC is incompletely understood, and it is debated whether MC on different processes is subserved by common or divergent networks. We combined behavioral phenotyping with multi-modal neuroimaging to investigate whether structural substrates of individual differences in MC on higher-order cognition (MC-C) are dissociable from those underlying MC on perceptual accuracy (MC-P). Motivated by conceptual work suggesting a link between MC and cognitive perspective taking, we furthermore tested for overlaps between MC substrates and mentalizing networks. In a large sample of healthy adults, individual differences in MC-C and MC-P did not correlate. MRI-based cortical thickness mapping revealed a structural basis of this independence, by showing that individual differences in MC-P related to right prefrontal cortical thickness, while MC-C scores correlated with measures in lateral prefrontal, temporo-parietal, and posterior midline regions. Surface-based superficial white matter diffusivity analysis revealed substrates resembling those seen for cortical thickness, confirming the divergence of both MC faculties using an independent imaging marker. Despite their specificity, substrates of MC-C and MC-P fell clearly within networks known to participate in mentalizing, confirmed by task-based fMRI in the same subjects, previous meta-analytical findings, and ad-hoc Neurosynth-based meta-analyses. Our integrative multi-method approach indicates domain-specific substrates of MC; despite their divergence, these nevertheless likely rely on component processes mediated by circuits also involved in mentalizing. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3388–3399, 2016.

AB - Humans have the ability to reflect upon their perception, thoughts, and actions, known as metacognition (MC). The brain basis of MC is incompletely understood, and it is debated whether MC on different processes is subserved by common or divergent networks. We combined behavioral phenotyping with multi-modal neuroimaging to investigate whether structural substrates of individual differences in MC on higher-order cognition (MC-C) are dissociable from those underlying MC on perceptual accuracy (MC-P). Motivated by conceptual work suggesting a link between MC and cognitive perspective taking, we furthermore tested for overlaps between MC substrates and mentalizing networks. In a large sample of healthy adults, individual differences in MC-C and MC-P did not correlate. MRI-based cortical thickness mapping revealed a structural basis of this independence, by showing that individual differences in MC-P related to right prefrontal cortical thickness, while MC-C scores correlated with measures in lateral prefrontal, temporo-parietal, and posterior midline regions. Surface-based superficial white matter diffusivity analysis revealed substrates resembling those seen for cortical thickness, confirming the divergence of both MC faculties using an independent imaging marker. Despite their specificity, substrates of MC-C and MC-P fell clearly within networks known to participate in mentalizing, confirmed by task-based fMRI in the same subjects, previous meta-analytical findings, and ad-hoc Neurosynth-based meta-analyses. Our integrative multi-method approach indicates domain-specific substrates of MC; despite their divergence, these nevertheless likely rely on component processes mediated by circuits also involved in mentalizing. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3388–3399, 2016.

KW - cognition

KW - individual differences

KW - interoceptive accuracy

KW - metacognition

KW - structural MRI

KW - theory of mind

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985914536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.23247

DO - 10.1002/hbm.23247

M3 - Article

C2 - 27151776

AN - SCOPUS:84985914536

VL - 37

SP - 3388

EP - 3399

JO - Human brain mapping

JF - Human brain mapping

SN - 1065-9471

IS - 10

ER -