Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Aufsatznummer | 424008 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 424008 |
| Seitenumfang | 1 |
| Fachzeitschrift | J. Phys. A |
| Jahrgang | 47 |
| Ausgabenummer | 42 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 24 Okt. 2014 |
Abstract
It is shown that a main source of conflict between Einstein and the mainstream quantum physicists was his insistence that wave functions, like classical probability distributions, do not refer to individual particles and, in particular, do not describe individual systems completely. The EPR paper was written to argue for this position. By aiming at showing that wave functions are unsuitable as local hidden variables, the authors failed to see that a slight extension could have ruled out such local hidden variables in general. As background for this analysis of the EPR argument the notion of steering is described, and a version of the Bell argument is proved which emphasizes non-local signalling aspects. Finally, some background is given concerning a well-known paper by the present author, which is celebrating 25 years this year, and in which the first non-steering models were constructed. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to '50 years of Bell's theorem'.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Physik und Astronomie (insg.)
- Statistische und nichtlineare Physik
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Statistik und Wahrscheinlichkeit
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Modellierung und Simulation
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Mathematische Physik
- Physik und Astronomie (insg.)
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: J. Phys. A, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 42, 424008, 24.10.2014, S. 424008.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Steering, or maybe why Einstein did not go all the way to Bell's argument
AU - Werner, R. F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/10/24
Y1 - 2014/10/24
N2 - It is shown that a main source of conflict between Einstein and the mainstream quantum physicists was his insistence that wave functions, like classical probability distributions, do not refer to individual particles and, in particular, do not describe individual systems completely. The EPR paper was written to argue for this position. By aiming at showing that wave functions are unsuitable as local hidden variables, the authors failed to see that a slight extension could have ruled out such local hidden variables in general. As background for this analysis of the EPR argument the notion of steering is described, and a version of the Bell argument is proved which emphasizes non-local signalling aspects. Finally, some background is given concerning a well-known paper by the present author, which is celebrating 25 years this year, and in which the first non-steering models were constructed. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to '50 years of Bell's theorem'.
AB - It is shown that a main source of conflict between Einstein and the mainstream quantum physicists was his insistence that wave functions, like classical probability distributions, do not refer to individual particles and, in particular, do not describe individual systems completely. The EPR paper was written to argue for this position. By aiming at showing that wave functions are unsuitable as local hidden variables, the authors failed to see that a slight extension could have ruled out such local hidden variables in general. As background for this analysis of the EPR argument the notion of steering is described, and a version of the Bell argument is proved which emphasizes non-local signalling aspects. Finally, some background is given concerning a well-known paper by the present author, which is celebrating 25 years this year, and in which the first non-steering models were constructed. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to '50 years of Bell's theorem'.
KW - Einstein, steering
KW - entanglement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907833954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424008
DO - 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424008
M3 - Article
VL - 47
SP - 424008
JO - J. Phys. A
JF - J. Phys. A
IS - 42
M1 - 424008
ER -