Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video?

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018
Herausgeber/-innenMarcus Trapp, Anne Hess, Kim Lauenroth
Seiten18-21
Seitenumfang4
ISBN (elektronisch)9781538684184
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 27 Dez. 2018

Abstract

Videos are one of the best documentation options for a rich and effective communication. They allow experiencing the overall context of a situation by representing concrete realizations of certain requirements. Despite 35 years of research on integrating videos in requirements engineering (RE), videos are not an established documentation option in terms of RE best practices. Several approaches use videos but omit the details about how to produce them. Software professionals lack knowledge on how to communicate visually with videos since they are not directors. Therefore, they do not necessarily have the required skills neither to produce good videos in general nor to deduce what constitutes a good video for an existing approach. The discipline of video production provides numerous generic guidelines that represent best practices on how to produce a good video with specific characteristics. We propose to analyze this existing know-how to learn what constitutes a good video for visual communication. As a plan of action, we suggest a literature study of video production guidelines. We expect to identify quality characteristics of good videos in order to derive a quality model. Software professionals may use such a quality model for videos as an orientation for planning, shooting, post-processing, and viewing a video. Thus, we want to encourage and enable software professionals to produce good videos at moderate costs, yet sufficient quality.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video? / Karras, Oliver; Schneider, Kurt.
Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018. Hrsg. / Marcus Trapp; Anne Hess; Kim Lauenroth. 2018. S. 18-21 8595129.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Karras, O & Schneider, K 2018, Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video? in M Trapp, A Hess & K Lauenroth (Hrsg.), Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018., 8595129, S. 18-21. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986, https://doi.org/10.1109/D4RE.2018.00011
Karras, O., & Schneider, K. (2018). Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video? In M. Trapp, A. Hess, & K. Lauenroth (Hrsg.), Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018 (S. 18-21). Artikel 8595129 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986, https://doi.org/10.1109/D4RE.2018.00011
Karras O, Schneider K. Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video? in Trapp M, Hess A, Lauenroth K, Hrsg., Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018. 2018. S. 18-21. 8595129 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986, 10.1109/D4RE.2018.00011
Karras, Oliver ; Schneider, Kurt. / Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video?. Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018. Hrsg. / Marcus Trapp ; Anne Hess ; Kim Lauenroth. 2018. S. 18-21
Download
@inproceedings{3f57c434b4314cd9a54032a73f529c17,
title = "Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video?",
abstract = "Videos are one of the best documentation options for a rich and effective communication. They allow experiencing the overall context of a situation by representing concrete realizations of certain requirements. Despite 35 years of research on integrating videos in requirements engineering (RE), videos are not an established documentation option in terms of RE best practices. Several approaches use videos but omit the details about how to produce them. Software professionals lack knowledge on how to communicate visually with videos since they are not directors. Therefore, they do not necessarily have the required skills neither to produce good videos in general nor to deduce what constitutes a good video for an existing approach. The discipline of video production provides numerous generic guidelines that represent best practices on how to produce a good video with specific characteristics. We propose to analyze this existing know-how to learn what constitutes a good video for visual communication. As a plan of action, we suggest a literature study of video production guidelines. We expect to identify quality characteristics of good videos in order to derive a quality model. Software professionals may use such a quality model for videos as an orientation for planning, shooting, post-processing, and viewing a video. Thus, we want to encourage and enable software professionals to produce good videos at moderate costs, yet sufficient quality.",
keywords = "Characteristic, Production, Quality model, Requirements engineering, Video",
author = "Oliver Karras and Kurt Schneider",
note = "Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (DFG) under Grant No.: 289386339, (2017 – 2019).",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "27",
doi = "10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986",
language = "English",
pages = "18--21",
editor = "Marcus Trapp and Anne Hess and Kim Lauenroth",
booktitle = "Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Software Professionals are Not Directors: What Constitutes a Good Video?

AU - Karras, Oliver

AU - Schneider, Kurt

N1 - Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (DFG) under Grant No.: 289386339, (2017 – 2019).

PY - 2018/12/27

Y1 - 2018/12/27

N2 - Videos are one of the best documentation options for a rich and effective communication. They allow experiencing the overall context of a situation by representing concrete realizations of certain requirements. Despite 35 years of research on integrating videos in requirements engineering (RE), videos are not an established documentation option in terms of RE best practices. Several approaches use videos but omit the details about how to produce them. Software professionals lack knowledge on how to communicate visually with videos since they are not directors. Therefore, they do not necessarily have the required skills neither to produce good videos in general nor to deduce what constitutes a good video for an existing approach. The discipline of video production provides numerous generic guidelines that represent best practices on how to produce a good video with specific characteristics. We propose to analyze this existing know-how to learn what constitutes a good video for visual communication. As a plan of action, we suggest a literature study of video production guidelines. We expect to identify quality characteristics of good videos in order to derive a quality model. Software professionals may use such a quality model for videos as an orientation for planning, shooting, post-processing, and viewing a video. Thus, we want to encourage and enable software professionals to produce good videos at moderate costs, yet sufficient quality.

AB - Videos are one of the best documentation options for a rich and effective communication. They allow experiencing the overall context of a situation by representing concrete realizations of certain requirements. Despite 35 years of research on integrating videos in requirements engineering (RE), videos are not an established documentation option in terms of RE best practices. Several approaches use videos but omit the details about how to produce them. Software professionals lack knowledge on how to communicate visually with videos since they are not directors. Therefore, they do not necessarily have the required skills neither to produce good videos in general nor to deduce what constitutes a good video for an existing approach. The discipline of video production provides numerous generic guidelines that represent best practices on how to produce a good video with specific characteristics. We propose to analyze this existing know-how to learn what constitutes a good video for visual communication. As a plan of action, we suggest a literature study of video production guidelines. We expect to identify quality characteristics of good videos in order to derive a quality model. Software professionals may use such a quality model for videos as an orientation for planning, shooting, post-processing, and viewing a video. Thus, we want to encourage and enable software professionals to produce good videos at moderate costs, yet sufficient quality.

KW - Characteristic

KW - Production

KW - Quality model

KW - Requirements engineering

KW - Video

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057291609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986

DO - 10.48550/arXiv.1808.04986

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 18

EP - 21

BT - Proceedings - 2018 1st International Workshop on Learning from other Disciplines for Requirements Engineering, D4RE 2018

A2 - Trapp, Marcus

A2 - Hess, Anne

A2 - Lauenroth, Kim

ER -

Von denselben Autoren