Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • W. Greiner
  • K. Obermann
  • J. M. Schulenburg
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)147-155
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftArchives of Hellenic Medicine
Jahrgang18
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplantation technology has reached a very high standard in the last decades. In the industrialised countries it belongs to the services which are offered by high-level hospitals besides university clinics. The number of transplantations is limited almost exclusively by the scarce graft supply. As health care budgets are increasingly limited, advanced and costly technologies have to prove their cost-effectiveness. This article presents a study about cost, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of kidney transplantation in a major hospital in Germany. METHOD: From the waiting list of Hannover Medical School (MHH) 1,149 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled in the study and asked to answer the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Of the waiting list group, 199 patients underwent transplantation during the 16-month study period. The cost incurred by 77 patients was fully documented for their hospitalization period. A comparison of direct and indirect cost for dialysis and kidney transplantation and cost utility analysis (QALY approach) was conducted. RESULTS: The average direct cost of kidney transplantation was 59,980 DM (indirect cost: 5,150 DM) in the first year. The cost of immunosuppressive drugs and subsequent care was 15,006 DM per year. Kidney transplantation is cost saving two years after operation (in comparison to dialysis). In addition, quality of life scores were higher for the transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation has advantages both for patients with regard to quality of life and for health insurances with regard to lower cost of care for ESRD patients.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany. / Greiner, W.; Obermann, K.; Schulenburg, J. M.
in: Archives of Hellenic Medicine, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 2, 2001, S. 147-155.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Greiner, W, Obermann, K & Schulenburg, JM 2001, 'Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany', Archives of Hellenic Medicine, Jg. 18, Nr. 2, S. 147-155. <http://www.mednet.gr/archives/2001-2/147abs.html>
Greiner, W., Obermann, K., & Schulenburg, J. M. (2001). Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 18(2), 147-155. http://www.mednet.gr/archives/2001-2/147abs.html
Greiner W, Obermann K, Schulenburg JM. Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany. Archives of Hellenic Medicine. 2001;18(2):147-155.
Greiner, W. ; Obermann, K. ; Schulenburg, J. M. / Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany. in: Archives of Hellenic Medicine. 2001 ; Jahrgang 18, Nr. 2. S. 147-155.
Download
@article{26529b69c8ae4d86a3a40233c3fc93c0,
title = "Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplantation technology has reached a very high standard in the last decades. In the industrialised countries it belongs to the services which are offered by high-level hospitals besides university clinics. The number of transplantations is limited almost exclusively by the scarce graft supply. As health care budgets are increasingly limited, advanced and costly technologies have to prove their cost-effectiveness. This article presents a study about cost, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of kidney transplantation in a major hospital in Germany. METHOD: From the waiting list of Hannover Medical School (MHH) 1,149 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled in the study and asked to answer the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Of the waiting list group, 199 patients underwent transplantation during the 16-month study period. The cost incurred by 77 patients was fully documented for their hospitalization period. A comparison of direct and indirect cost for dialysis and kidney transplantation and cost utility analysis (QALY approach) was conducted. RESULTS: The average direct cost of kidney transplantation was 59,980 DM (indirect cost: 5,150 DM) in the first year. The cost of immunosuppressive drugs and subsequent care was 15,006 DM per year. Kidney transplantation is cost saving two years after operation (in comparison to dialysis). In addition, quality of life scores were higher for the transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation has advantages both for patients with regard to quality of life and for health insurances with regard to lower cost of care for ESRD patients.",
keywords = "Cost utility, Dialysis, Germany, Kidney transplant, QALYs",
author = "W. Greiner and K. Obermann and Schulenburg, {J. M.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "147--155",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation in Germany

AU - Greiner, W.

AU - Obermann, K.

AU - Schulenburg, J. M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplantation technology has reached a very high standard in the last decades. In the industrialised countries it belongs to the services which are offered by high-level hospitals besides university clinics. The number of transplantations is limited almost exclusively by the scarce graft supply. As health care budgets are increasingly limited, advanced and costly technologies have to prove their cost-effectiveness. This article presents a study about cost, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of kidney transplantation in a major hospital in Germany. METHOD: From the waiting list of Hannover Medical School (MHH) 1,149 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled in the study and asked to answer the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Of the waiting list group, 199 patients underwent transplantation during the 16-month study period. The cost incurred by 77 patients was fully documented for their hospitalization period. A comparison of direct and indirect cost for dialysis and kidney transplantation and cost utility analysis (QALY approach) was conducted. RESULTS: The average direct cost of kidney transplantation was 59,980 DM (indirect cost: 5,150 DM) in the first year. The cost of immunosuppressive drugs and subsequent care was 15,006 DM per year. Kidney transplantation is cost saving two years after operation (in comparison to dialysis). In addition, quality of life scores were higher for the transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation has advantages both for patients with regard to quality of life and for health insurances with regard to lower cost of care for ESRD patients.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplantation technology has reached a very high standard in the last decades. In the industrialised countries it belongs to the services which are offered by high-level hospitals besides university clinics. The number of transplantations is limited almost exclusively by the scarce graft supply. As health care budgets are increasingly limited, advanced and costly technologies have to prove their cost-effectiveness. This article presents a study about cost, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of kidney transplantation in a major hospital in Germany. METHOD: From the waiting list of Hannover Medical School (MHH) 1,149 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled in the study and asked to answer the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Of the waiting list group, 199 patients underwent transplantation during the 16-month study period. The cost incurred by 77 patients was fully documented for their hospitalization period. A comparison of direct and indirect cost for dialysis and kidney transplantation and cost utility analysis (QALY approach) was conducted. RESULTS: The average direct cost of kidney transplantation was 59,980 DM (indirect cost: 5,150 DM) in the first year. The cost of immunosuppressive drugs and subsequent care was 15,006 DM per year. Kidney transplantation is cost saving two years after operation (in comparison to dialysis). In addition, quality of life scores were higher for the transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation has advantages both for patients with regard to quality of life and for health insurances with regard to lower cost of care for ESRD patients.

KW - Cost utility

KW - Dialysis

KW - Germany

KW - Kidney transplant

KW - QALYs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035210540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035210540

VL - 18

SP - 147

EP - 155

JO - Archives of Hellenic Medicine

JF - Archives of Hellenic Medicine

SN - 1105-3992

IS - 2

ER -