Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 13-42 |
| Seitenumfang | 30 |
| Fachzeitschrift | German economic review |
| Jahrgang | 16 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Feb. 2015 |
Abstract
The 2005 reform of the German welfare system introduced two competing organizational models for welfare administration. In most districts, a centralized organization was established where local welfare agencies are bound to central directives. At the same time, 69 districts were allowed to opt for a decentralized organization. We evaluate the relative success of both types in terms of integrating welfare recipients into employment. Compared to centralized organization, decentralized organization has a negative effect on employment chances of males. For women, no significant effect is found. These findings are robust to the inclusion of aspects of internal organization common to both types of agencies.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre und Ökonometrie
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: German economic review, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 01.02.2015, S. 13-42.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Should Welfare Administration be Centralized or Decentralized?
T2 - Evidence from a Policy Experiment
AU - Boockmann, Bernhard
AU - Thomsen, Stephan L.
AU - Walter, Thomas
AU - Göbel, Christian
AU - Huber, Martin
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - The 2005 reform of the German welfare system introduced two competing organizational models for welfare administration. In most districts, a centralized organization was established where local welfare agencies are bound to central directives. At the same time, 69 districts were allowed to opt for a decentralized organization. We evaluate the relative success of both types in terms of integrating welfare recipients into employment. Compared to centralized organization, decentralized organization has a negative effect on employment chances of males. For women, no significant effect is found. These findings are robust to the inclusion of aspects of internal organization common to both types of agencies.
AB - The 2005 reform of the German welfare system introduced two competing organizational models for welfare administration. In most districts, a centralized organization was established where local welfare agencies are bound to central directives. At the same time, 69 districts were allowed to opt for a decentralized organization. We evaluate the relative success of both types in terms of integrating welfare recipients into employment. Compared to centralized organization, decentralized organization has a negative effect on employment chances of males. For women, no significant effect is found. These findings are robust to the inclusion of aspects of internal organization common to both types of agencies.
KW - Decentralization
KW - Labor market integration
KW - Organization
KW - Welfare system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921612228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/geer.12021
DO - 10.1111/geer.12021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84921612228
VL - 16
SP - 13
EP - 42
JO - German economic review
JF - German economic review
SN - 1465-6485
IS - 1
ER -