Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (FU Berlin)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)6-17
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftEcological indicators
Jahrgang61
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2016
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Integrated impact assessment (IA) of policies in the European Commission takes place in an environment of competing problem frames, contested policy objectives and a multitude of interested actors. This paper sets out to discuss the potential value of integrating the ecosystem services (ESS) concept for improving the consideration of environmental benefits and values during framing and appraisal of new policies at European level. The discussion was based on a workshop conducted with experts encompassing their disciplinary fields to the science-policy interface. A review of recent literature and impact assessment reports from policy science and ecosystem services research allowed for a two-way contemplation. The potential integration of concepts was analysed for conceptual, technical, ethical and pragmatic aspects. It was found that indicator sets applied in the impact assessment reports follow a much less formalised structure than the reports or the procedure. An integration of the ecosystem services concept would enhance the requisite variety of indicators used, and thus contribute to the overall goal for sustainable development. Potentials for improving IA lie particularly in the up- and downscaling of benefits and values, policy relevant comparative studies and the prospective possibilities for innovation in indicator development. Based on this rationale of improving requisite variety for future decision making, the emphasis lies on a further development of the ESS concept along two pathways of operationalisation: the translation of the concept for a comprehensive approach at a higher level of abstraction (soft application), and the application of the concept for providing aggregated, quantitative and unit-based information at different steps of an IA (hard application).

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment? / Diehl, Katharina; Burkhard, Benjamin; Jacob, Klaus.
in: Ecological indicators, Jahrgang 61, 02.2016, S. 6-17.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{c61435d1ad734f0481c22dca5d62c2de,
title = "Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment?",
abstract = "Integrated impact assessment (IA) of policies in the European Commission takes place in an environment of competing problem frames, contested policy objectives and a multitude of interested actors. This paper sets out to discuss the potential value of integrating the ecosystem services (ESS) concept for improving the consideration of environmental benefits and values during framing and appraisal of new policies at European level. The discussion was based on a workshop conducted with experts encompassing their disciplinary fields to the science-policy interface. A review of recent literature and impact assessment reports from policy science and ecosystem services research allowed for a two-way contemplation. The potential integration of concepts was analysed for conceptual, technical, ethical and pragmatic aspects. It was found that indicator sets applied in the impact assessment reports follow a much less formalised structure than the reports or the procedure. An integration of the ecosystem services concept would enhance the requisite variety of indicators used, and thus contribute to the overall goal for sustainable development. Potentials for improving IA lie particularly in the up- and downscaling of benefits and values, policy relevant comparative studies and the prospective possibilities for innovation in indicator development. Based on this rationale of improving requisite variety for future decision making, the emphasis lies on a further development of the ESS concept along two pathways of operationalisation: the translation of the concept for a comprehensive approach at a higher level of abstraction (soft application), and the application of the concept for providing aggregated, quantitative and unit-based information at different steps of an IA (hard application).",
keywords = "Ecosystem services, European Union, Integration, Policy assessment, Requisite variety, Sustainability",
author = "Katharina Diehl and Benjamin Burkhard and Klaus Jacob",
note = "Funding Information: We express our gratitude to the expert researchers who engaged in the initial discussion in Vigoni 2012. We also thank Aranka Podhora and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. The meeting itself and parts of this work were funded by the LIAISE Network of Excellence (FP 7 Environment; Grant Nr. 243826 ). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 The Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "6--17",
journal = "Ecological indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment?

AU - Diehl, Katharina

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - Jacob, Klaus

N1 - Funding Information: We express our gratitude to the expert researchers who engaged in the initial discussion in Vigoni 2012. We also thank Aranka Podhora and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. The meeting itself and parts of this work were funded by the LIAISE Network of Excellence (FP 7 Environment; Grant Nr. 243826 ). Publisher Copyright: © 2015 The Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Integrated impact assessment (IA) of policies in the European Commission takes place in an environment of competing problem frames, contested policy objectives and a multitude of interested actors. This paper sets out to discuss the potential value of integrating the ecosystem services (ESS) concept for improving the consideration of environmental benefits and values during framing and appraisal of new policies at European level. The discussion was based on a workshop conducted with experts encompassing their disciplinary fields to the science-policy interface. A review of recent literature and impact assessment reports from policy science and ecosystem services research allowed for a two-way contemplation. The potential integration of concepts was analysed for conceptual, technical, ethical and pragmatic aspects. It was found that indicator sets applied in the impact assessment reports follow a much less formalised structure than the reports or the procedure. An integration of the ecosystem services concept would enhance the requisite variety of indicators used, and thus contribute to the overall goal for sustainable development. Potentials for improving IA lie particularly in the up- and downscaling of benefits and values, policy relevant comparative studies and the prospective possibilities for innovation in indicator development. Based on this rationale of improving requisite variety for future decision making, the emphasis lies on a further development of the ESS concept along two pathways of operationalisation: the translation of the concept for a comprehensive approach at a higher level of abstraction (soft application), and the application of the concept for providing aggregated, quantitative and unit-based information at different steps of an IA (hard application).

AB - Integrated impact assessment (IA) of policies in the European Commission takes place in an environment of competing problem frames, contested policy objectives and a multitude of interested actors. This paper sets out to discuss the potential value of integrating the ecosystem services (ESS) concept for improving the consideration of environmental benefits and values during framing and appraisal of new policies at European level. The discussion was based on a workshop conducted with experts encompassing their disciplinary fields to the science-policy interface. A review of recent literature and impact assessment reports from policy science and ecosystem services research allowed for a two-way contemplation. The potential integration of concepts was analysed for conceptual, technical, ethical and pragmatic aspects. It was found that indicator sets applied in the impact assessment reports follow a much less formalised structure than the reports or the procedure. An integration of the ecosystem services concept would enhance the requisite variety of indicators used, and thus contribute to the overall goal for sustainable development. Potentials for improving IA lie particularly in the up- and downscaling of benefits and values, policy relevant comparative studies and the prospective possibilities for innovation in indicator development. Based on this rationale of improving requisite variety for future decision making, the emphasis lies on a further development of the ESS concept along two pathways of operationalisation: the translation of the concept for a comprehensive approach at a higher level of abstraction (soft application), and the application of the concept for providing aggregated, quantitative and unit-based information at different steps of an IA (hard application).

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - European Union

KW - Integration

KW - Policy assessment

KW - Requisite variety

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938717601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938717601

VL - 61

SP - 6

EP - 17

JO - Ecological indicators

JF - Ecological indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -

Von denselben Autoren