Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 315-338 |
Seitenumfang | 24 |
Fachzeitschrift | International Journal of Industrial Organization |
Jahrgang | 18 |
Ausgabenummer | 2 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 13 Jan. 2000 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Feb. 2000 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Abstract
This paper introduces technological uncertainty into a timing game of new technology adoption. It is shown that the timing neither necessarily involves first-mover advantages in precommitment equilibria (Reinganum, Review of Economic Studies, XLVIII (1981) 395-405) nor rent-equalization due to the threat of preemption (Fudenberg and Tirole, Review of Economic Studies, LII (1985) 383-401). Rather, there may be second-mover advantages because of informational spillovers. Furthermore, the model predicts that the equilibrium payoffs will typically be discontinuous and non-monotonic in the probability that the new technology is profitable. A welfare analysis reveals several market failures, and suggests that policy intervention should adequately depend on the nature of uncertainty and the rate of technological progress.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Betriebswirtschaft, Management und Rechnungswesen (insg.)
- Arbeitgeber-Arbeitnehmer-Beziehungen
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre und Ökonometrie
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (sonstige)
- Betriebswirtschaft, Management und Rechnungswesen (insg.)
- Strategie und Management
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen und Fertigungstechnik
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: International Journal of Industrial Organization, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 2, 02.2000, S. 315-338.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty
AU - Hoppe, Heidrun C.
N1 - Funding Information: I would like to thank Reiko Aoki, Richard Jensen, Ulrich Lehmann-Grube, Sujoy Mukerji, Wilhelm Pfähler, the editor, two anonymous referees, and seminar participants at the Universities of Hamburg, Kentucky, and Southampton, SUNY Stony Brook, and WZB for helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support by the German Marshall Fund of the United States through grant no. A-0375-02 is gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2000/2
Y1 - 2000/2
N2 - This paper introduces technological uncertainty into a timing game of new technology adoption. It is shown that the timing neither necessarily involves first-mover advantages in precommitment equilibria (Reinganum, Review of Economic Studies, XLVIII (1981) 395-405) nor rent-equalization due to the threat of preemption (Fudenberg and Tirole, Review of Economic Studies, LII (1985) 383-401). Rather, there may be second-mover advantages because of informational spillovers. Furthermore, the model predicts that the equilibrium payoffs will typically be discontinuous and non-monotonic in the probability that the new technology is profitable. A welfare analysis reveals several market failures, and suggests that policy intervention should adequately depend on the nature of uncertainty and the rate of technological progress.
AB - This paper introduces technological uncertainty into a timing game of new technology adoption. It is shown that the timing neither necessarily involves first-mover advantages in precommitment equilibria (Reinganum, Review of Economic Studies, XLVIII (1981) 395-405) nor rent-equalization due to the threat of preemption (Fudenberg and Tirole, Review of Economic Studies, LII (1985) 383-401). Rather, there may be second-mover advantages because of informational spillovers. Furthermore, the model predicts that the equilibrium payoffs will typically be discontinuous and non-monotonic in the probability that the new technology is profitable. A welfare analysis reveals several market failures, and suggests that policy intervention should adequately depend on the nature of uncertainty and the rate of technological progress.
KW - Innovation
KW - L13
KW - O31
KW - O32
KW - Technological uncertainty
KW - Timing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034409893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/s0167-7187(98)00020-4
DO - 10.1016/s0167-7187(98)00020-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034409893
VL - 18
SP - 315
EP - 338
JO - International Journal of Industrial Organization
JF - International Journal of Industrial Organization
SN - 0167-7187
IS - 2
ER -