Nach Publikationen suchen

Organisationen

Alle Organisationen

Typ

Sprache

Peer-Review

Jahr des Erscheinens

bis

Open Access-Status

Verfasser*in

Volltext

Suche zurücksetzen

21 - 40 von 56Seitengröße: 20

sortieren: Veröffentlichungsdatum

2022
Veröffentlicht
Epistemic Interests and the Objectivity of Inquiry
Wilholt, T., Feb. 2022, in: Studies in history and philosophy of science. 91, S. 86-93 8 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
The New Demarcation Problem
Wilholt, T. & Holmann, B., Feb. 2022, in: Studies in history and philosophy of science. 91, S. 211-220 10 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Is Kuhn’s “World Change through Revolutions” Comprehensible?
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2022, in: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 59, 4, S. 55-72 18 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Psychopathy as a Scientific Kind: On Usefulness and Underpinnings
Reydon, T. A. C., 2022, Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity and Status. Malatesti, L., McMillan, J. & Šustar, P. (Hrsg.). 1 Aufl. S. 169-187 19 S. (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences; Band 27).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Beitrag in Buch/Sammelwerk › Forschung
2021
Veröffentlicht
Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic
Lohse, S. & Canali, S., Dez. 2021, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 11, 4, 28 S., 99.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine
Lohse, S., Okt. 2021, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 89, S. 41-51 11 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution
Reydon, T. A. C., 12 Mai 2021, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 11, 48.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Getting more out of interviews: Understanding interviewees’ accounts in relation to their frames of orientation
Philipps, A. & Mrowczynski, R., 1 Feb. 2021, in: Qualitative research. 21, 1, S. 59-75 17 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
2020
Veröffentlicht
The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy
Lohse, S. & Bschir, K., Dez. 2020, in: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 42, 4, 5 S., 58.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Kommentar in Fachzeitschrift › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
How can science be well-ordered in times of crisis? Learning from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Reydon, T. A. C., 3 Nov. 2020, in: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 42, 4, 53.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Construct validity in psychological tests: the case of implicit social cognition
Feest, U., 8 Jan. 2020, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 10, 1, 4.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
2019
Veröffentlicht
The making of professors: Assessment and recognition in academic recruitment
Hamann, J., Dez. 2019, in: Social studies of science. 49, 6, S. 919-941 23 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Unconventional ideas conventionally arranged: A study of grant proposals for exceptional research
Philipps, A. & Weißenborn, L., Dez. 2019, in: Social studies of science. 49, 6, S. 884-897 14 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
No evidence for a protective effect of education on mental health
Dahmann, S. C. & Schnitzlein, D. D., Nov. 2019, in: Social Science and Medicine. 241, 112584.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Taxa hold little information about organisms: Some inferential problems in biological systematics
Reydon, T. A. C., 7 Okt. 2019, in: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 41, 4, 40.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Are Species Good Units for Biodiversity Studies and Conservation Efforts?
Reydon, T. A. C., 18 Juni 2019, From Assessing to Conserving Biodiversity: Conceptual and Practical Challenges. Casetta, E., da Silva, J. M. & Vecchi, D. (Hrsg.). 1. Aufl. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., S. 167-193 27 S. (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences; Band 24).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Beitrag in Buch/Sammelwerk › Forschung › Peer-Review
“It might be this, it should be that…” uncertainty and doubt in day-to-day research practice
Schickore, J. & Hangel, N., 26 März 2019, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 9, 2, 31.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Training proprioception with sound: effects of real-timeauditory feedback on intermodal learning
Ghai, S., Schmitz, G., Hwang, T. & Effenberg, A. O., 25 Feb. 2019, in: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1438, 1, S. 50-61 12 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
2018
Veröffentlicht
Acceleration and deceleration at constant speed: Systematic modulation of motion perception by kinematic sonification
Effenberg, A. O. & Schmitz, G., Aug. 2018, in: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1425, 1, S. 52-69 18 S.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
Veröffentlicht
Are There Good Arguments Against Scientific Realism?
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 27 März 2018, Philosophy of Science: Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. 1 Aufl. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., S. 3-22 20 S. (European Studies in Philosophy of Science; Band 9).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Beitrag in Buch/Sammelwerk › Forschung › Peer-Review

Vorherige 1 2 3 Nächste

Research@Leibniz University

Nach Publikationen suchen

Epistemic Interests and the Objectivity of Inquiry

The New Demarcation Problem

Is Kuhn’s “World Change through Revolutions” Comprehensible?

Psychopathy as a Scientific Kind: On Usefulness and Underpinnings

Follow the science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic

Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine

Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution

Getting more out of interviews: Understanding interviewees’ accounts in relation to their frames of orientation

The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy

How can science be well-ordered in times of crisis? Learning from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Construct validity in psychological tests: the case of implicit social cognition

The making of professors: Assessment and recognition in academic recruitment

Unconventional ideas conventionally arranged: A study of grant proposals for exceptional research

No evidence for a protective effect of education on mental health

Taxa hold little information about organisms: Some inferential problems in biological systematics

Are Species Good Units for Biodiversity Studies and Conservation Efforts?

“It might be this, it should be that…” uncertainty and doubt in day-to-day research practice

Training proprioception with sound: effects of real-timeauditory feedback on intermodal learning

Acceleration and deceleration at constant speed: Systematic modulation of motion perception by kinematic sonification

Are There Good Arguments Against Scientific Realism?