Details
| Titel in Übersetzung | Writing, Paper and Law. Concerning the Transition in Storage Media in the Modern and Postmodern Eras - A Sketch |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 219-250 |
| Seitenumfang | 32 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung |
| Jahrgang | 132 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 6 Juli 2015 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Aug. 2015 |
Abstract
At present, certain fields of law experience a media transformation, which is well underway. As at the threshold of the late Middle Ages and the Early Modern era, the transfer of money and payment plays a leading role. But what is, intrinsically, this media transition? Legal history proofs that principles of the written form had taken effect already in the ancient world rather than only in the Early Modern era. The invention of letterpress printing was neither cause nor trigger of the written form, while influencing the theory of the close of writing: The "demise of writing" is not to be expected, as the current transition does not concern the writing itself but rather the storage medium. New legal development stems from the emancipation of writing from paper. Today, the role of the printed book in the future, or whether there will still be bank notes, or bank statement printers, and how notaries will certify marriage contracts, or last wills, or company agreements, is uncertain. Surely, the "materiality" of paper has a wider time horizon than electronic storage media. Paper can be restored. It stays without continuous new formatting. As for literacy, the enhancement of the mobile phone on keyboards and screens ("the eye's victory over the ear") is also a victory of writing over the spoken word. Therefore we may expect paper to stay important, but within a diversification of information storage media.
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung, Jahrgang 132, Nr. 1, 01.08.2015, S. 219-250.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Schriftlichkeit, Papier und Recht
T2 - Zum Wandel der Speichermedien in Moderne und Postmoderne - eine Skizze
AU - Meder, Stephan
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 by Böhlau Verlag GmbH & Co.KG 2015.
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - At present, certain fields of law experience a media transformation, which is well underway. As at the threshold of the late Middle Ages and the Early Modern era, the transfer of money and payment plays a leading role. But what is, intrinsically, this media transition? Legal history proofs that principles of the written form had taken effect already in the ancient world rather than only in the Early Modern era. The invention of letterpress printing was neither cause nor trigger of the written form, while influencing the theory of the close of writing: The "demise of writing" is not to be expected, as the current transition does not concern the writing itself but rather the storage medium. New legal development stems from the emancipation of writing from paper. Today, the role of the printed book in the future, or whether there will still be bank notes, or bank statement printers, and how notaries will certify marriage contracts, or last wills, or company agreements, is uncertain. Surely, the "materiality" of paper has a wider time horizon than electronic storage media. Paper can be restored. It stays without continuous new formatting. As for literacy, the enhancement of the mobile phone on keyboards and screens ("the eye's victory over the ear") is also a victory of writing over the spoken word. Therefore we may expect paper to stay important, but within a diversification of information storage media.
AB - At present, certain fields of law experience a media transformation, which is well underway. As at the threshold of the late Middle Ages and the Early Modern era, the transfer of money and payment plays a leading role. But what is, intrinsically, this media transition? Legal history proofs that principles of the written form had taken effect already in the ancient world rather than only in the Early Modern era. The invention of letterpress printing was neither cause nor trigger of the written form, while influencing the theory of the close of writing: The "demise of writing" is not to be expected, as the current transition does not concern the writing itself but rather the storage medium. New legal development stems from the emancipation of writing from paper. Today, the role of the printed book in the future, or whether there will still be bank notes, or bank statement printers, and how notaries will certify marriage contracts, or last wills, or company agreements, is uncertain. Surely, the "materiality" of paper has a wider time horizon than electronic storage media. Paper can be restored. It stays without continuous new formatting. As for literacy, the enhancement of the mobile phone on keyboards and screens ("the eye's victory over the ear") is also a victory of writing over the spoken word. Therefore we may expect paper to stay important, but within a diversification of information storage media.
KW - demise of writing
KW - literacy
KW - orality
KW - storage media
KW - transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940978887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7767/zrgga-2015-0110
DO - 10.7767/zrgga-2015-0110
M3 - Artikel
AN - SCOPUS:84940978887
VL - 132
SP - 219
EP - 250
JO - Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung
JF - Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung
SN - 0323-4045
IS - 1
ER -