Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Caroline Morais
  • Hector Diego Estrada-Lugo
  • Silvia Tolo
  • Tiago Jacques
  • Raphael Moura
  • Michael Beer
  • Edoardo Patelli

Externe Organisationen

  • The University of Liverpool
  • University of Nottingham
  • Tongji University
  • University of Strathclyde
  • Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer107990
FachzeitschriftReliability engineering & system safety
Jahrgang218
AusgabenummerPart A
Frühes Online-Datum15 Okt. 2021
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2022

Abstract

Despite increasing collection efforts of empirical human reliability data, the available databases are still insufficient for understanding the relationships between human errors and their influencing factors. Currently, probabilistic tools such as Bayesian network are used to model data uncertainty requiring the estimation of conditional probability tables from data that is often not available. The most common solution relies on the adoption of assumptions and expert elicitation to fill the gaps. This gives an unjustified sense of confidence on the analysis. This paper proposes a novel methodology for dealing with missing data using intervals comprising the lowest and highest possible probability values. Its implementation requires a shift from Bayesian to credal networks. This allows to keep track of the associated uncertainty on the available data. The methodology has been applied to the quantification of the risks associated to a storage tank depressurisation of offshore oil & gas installations known as FPSOs and FSOs. The critical task analysis is converted to a cause-consequence structure and used to build a credal network, which extracts human factors combinations from major accidents database defined with CREAM classification scheme. Prediction analysis shows results with interval probabilities rather than point values measuring the effect of missing-data variables. Novel decision-making strategies for diagnostic analysis are suggested to unveil the most relevant variables for risk reduction in presence of imprecision. Realistic uncertainty depiction implies less conservative human reliability analysis and improve risk communication between assessors and decision-makers.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks. / Morais, Caroline; Estrada-Lugo, Hector Diego; Tolo, Silvia et al.
in: Reliability engineering & system safety, Jahrgang 218, Nr. Part A, 107990, 02.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Morais, C, Estrada-Lugo, HD, Tolo, S, Jacques, T, Moura, R, Beer, M & Patelli, E 2022, 'Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks', Reliability engineering & system safety, Jg. 218, Nr. Part A, 107990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990
Morais, C., Estrada-Lugo, H. D., Tolo, S., Jacques, T., Moura, R., Beer, M., & Patelli, E. (2022). Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks. Reliability engineering & system safety, 218(Part A), Artikel 107990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990
Morais C, Estrada-Lugo HD, Tolo S, Jacques T, Moura R, Beer M et al. Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks. Reliability engineering & system safety. 2022 Feb;218(Part A):107990. Epub 2021 Okt 15. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990
Morais, Caroline ; Estrada-Lugo, Hector Diego ; Tolo, Silvia et al. / Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks. in: Reliability engineering & system safety. 2022 ; Jahrgang 218, Nr. Part A.
Download
@article{d7f90d95706341cba747d2827ed16625,
title = "Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks",
abstract = "Despite increasing collection efforts of empirical human reliability data, the available databases are still insufficient for understanding the relationships between human errors and their influencing factors. Currently, probabilistic tools such as Bayesian network are used to model data uncertainty requiring the estimation of conditional probability tables from data that is often not available. The most common solution relies on the adoption of assumptions and expert elicitation to fill the gaps. This gives an unjustified sense of confidence on the analysis. This paper proposes a novel methodology for dealing with missing data using intervals comprising the lowest and highest possible probability values. Its implementation requires a shift from Bayesian to credal networks. This allows to keep track of the associated uncertainty on the available data. The methodology has been applied to the quantification of the risks associated to a storage tank depressurisation of offshore oil & gas installations known as FPSOs and FSOs. The critical task analysis is converted to a cause-consequence structure and used to build a credal network, which extracts human factors combinations from major accidents database defined with CREAM classification scheme. Prediction analysis shows results with interval probabilities rather than point values measuring the effect of missing-data variables. Novel decision-making strategies for diagnostic analysis are suggested to unveil the most relevant variables for risk reduction in presence of imprecision. Realistic uncertainty depiction implies less conservative human reliability analysis and improve risk communication between assessors and decision-makers.",
keywords = "CREAM, Credal network, FPSO/FSO, Human reliability analysis (HRA), Missing data, Quantified bow-tie",
author = "Caroline Morais and Estrada-Lugo, {Hector Diego} and Silvia Tolo and Tiago Jacques and Raphael Moura and Michael Beer and Edoardo Patelli",
note = "Funding Information: Caroline Morais gratefully acknowledges the Brazilian Oil & Gas regulator ANP (Agencia Nacional do Petroleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustiveis) for the support for her research. Hector Diego Estrada-Lugo gratefully acknowledges the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologıa (CONACyT) for the scholarship awarded by the Mexican government for graduate studies. Edoardo Patelli was partially supported by the EPSRC grant EP/R020558/2 Resilience Modelling Framework for Improved Nuclear Safety (NuRes). Funding Information: Caroline Morais gratefully acknowledges the Brazilian Oil & Gas regulator ANP (Agencia Nacional do Petroleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustiveis) for the support for her research. Hector Diego Estrada-Lugo gratefully acknowledges the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog?a (CONACyT) for the scholarship awarded by the Mexican government for graduate studies. Edoardo Patelli was partially supported by the EPSRC grant EP/R020558/2 Resilience Modelling Framework for Improved Nuclear Safety (NuRes).",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990",
language = "English",
volume = "218",
journal = "Reliability engineering & system safety",
issn = "0951-8320",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",
number = "Part A",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust data-driven human reliability analysis using credal networks

AU - Morais, Caroline

AU - Estrada-Lugo, Hector Diego

AU - Tolo, Silvia

AU - Jacques, Tiago

AU - Moura, Raphael

AU - Beer, Michael

AU - Patelli, Edoardo

N1 - Funding Information: Caroline Morais gratefully acknowledges the Brazilian Oil & Gas regulator ANP (Agencia Nacional do Petroleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustiveis) for the support for her research. Hector Diego Estrada-Lugo gratefully acknowledges the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologıa (CONACyT) for the scholarship awarded by the Mexican government for graduate studies. Edoardo Patelli was partially supported by the EPSRC grant EP/R020558/2 Resilience Modelling Framework for Improved Nuclear Safety (NuRes). Funding Information: Caroline Morais gratefully acknowledges the Brazilian Oil & Gas regulator ANP (Agencia Nacional do Petroleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustiveis) for the support for her research. Hector Diego Estrada-Lugo gratefully acknowledges the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog?a (CONACyT) for the scholarship awarded by the Mexican government for graduate studies. Edoardo Patelli was partially supported by the EPSRC grant EP/R020558/2 Resilience Modelling Framework for Improved Nuclear Safety (NuRes).

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Despite increasing collection efforts of empirical human reliability data, the available databases are still insufficient for understanding the relationships between human errors and their influencing factors. Currently, probabilistic tools such as Bayesian network are used to model data uncertainty requiring the estimation of conditional probability tables from data that is often not available. The most common solution relies on the adoption of assumptions and expert elicitation to fill the gaps. This gives an unjustified sense of confidence on the analysis. This paper proposes a novel methodology for dealing with missing data using intervals comprising the lowest and highest possible probability values. Its implementation requires a shift from Bayesian to credal networks. This allows to keep track of the associated uncertainty on the available data. The methodology has been applied to the quantification of the risks associated to a storage tank depressurisation of offshore oil & gas installations known as FPSOs and FSOs. The critical task analysis is converted to a cause-consequence structure and used to build a credal network, which extracts human factors combinations from major accidents database defined with CREAM classification scheme. Prediction analysis shows results with interval probabilities rather than point values measuring the effect of missing-data variables. Novel decision-making strategies for diagnostic analysis are suggested to unveil the most relevant variables for risk reduction in presence of imprecision. Realistic uncertainty depiction implies less conservative human reliability analysis and improve risk communication between assessors and decision-makers.

AB - Despite increasing collection efforts of empirical human reliability data, the available databases are still insufficient for understanding the relationships between human errors and their influencing factors. Currently, probabilistic tools such as Bayesian network are used to model data uncertainty requiring the estimation of conditional probability tables from data that is often not available. The most common solution relies on the adoption of assumptions and expert elicitation to fill the gaps. This gives an unjustified sense of confidence on the analysis. This paper proposes a novel methodology for dealing with missing data using intervals comprising the lowest and highest possible probability values. Its implementation requires a shift from Bayesian to credal networks. This allows to keep track of the associated uncertainty on the available data. The methodology has been applied to the quantification of the risks associated to a storage tank depressurisation of offshore oil & gas installations known as FPSOs and FSOs. The critical task analysis is converted to a cause-consequence structure and used to build a credal network, which extracts human factors combinations from major accidents database defined with CREAM classification scheme. Prediction analysis shows results with interval probabilities rather than point values measuring the effect of missing-data variables. Novel decision-making strategies for diagnostic analysis are suggested to unveil the most relevant variables for risk reduction in presence of imprecision. Realistic uncertainty depiction implies less conservative human reliability analysis and improve risk communication between assessors and decision-makers.

KW - CREAM

KW - Credal network

KW - FPSO/FSO

KW - Human reliability analysis (HRA)

KW - Missing data

KW - Quantified bow-tie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117831662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990

DO - 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107990

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85117831662

VL - 218

JO - Reliability engineering & system safety

JF - Reliability engineering & system safety

SN - 0951-8320

IS - Part A

M1 - 107990

ER -

Von denselben Autoren