Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Response of grass covers for dikes to coastal stressors during establishment phase

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer107488
FachzeitschriftEcological engineering
Jahrgang212
Frühes Online-Datum12 Dez. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2025

Abstract

Grass covers on dikes are subjected to a multitude of controlled and uncontrolled environmental stressors that can affect its vegetation development. Controlled stresses are applied during dike maintenance (e.g. mowing) to establish high coverage and a dense root system. Uncontrollable stresses during storm surges (e.g. flooding and wave loading) are likely to disturb this development. This species composition-based study analyses stress responses and their consequences for the ecological enhancement of grass covers in terms of dike safety. The responses of four different grass covers with increasing species numbers were investigated under three controlled experimental conditions, mimicking North Sea storm surge season in an outdoor wave-basin. We found significant differences in vegetation development indicating a shift of biomass from roots to shoots in response to flood stress. Resulting losses in the grass cover resistance were only minor for all grass covers. When additional wave stress was introduced no significant differences in root biomass were observed compared to the control group without flood or wave stress. The more herb and legume dominated grass covers seem to provide less erosion resistance for dike safety than the grass-dominated ones, as they develop the desired coverage slower and tend to have a lower shear strength. In conclusion, ecological enhancement by moderately increasing the number of species in the grass cover is possible without affecting dike safety. Evidence of disturbance in vegetation development highlight that thresholds and indicators for the early detection of stress responses need to be further investigated regarding the predicted intensification of uncontrolled environmental stressors. It is emphasised that long-term studies and adaptive monitoring are required to avoid unforeseen consequences by overloading the ability of grass covers to cope with and recover from coastal stressors and to find the optimal combination of ecological enhancement and dike safety.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Response of grass covers for dikes to coastal stressors during establishment phase. / Michalzik, Jochen; Paul, Maike; Schlurmann, Torsten.
in: Ecological engineering, Jahrgang 212, 107488, 02.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Michalzik J, Paul M, Schlurmann T. Response of grass covers for dikes to coastal stressors during establishment phase. Ecological engineering. 2025 Feb;212:107488. Epub 2024 Dez 12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107488
Download
@article{e71eb1fe62f24b58a5113cafe01e13a3,
title = "Response of grass covers for dikes to coastal stressors during establishment phase",
abstract = "Grass covers on dikes are subjected to a multitude of controlled and uncontrolled environmental stressors that can affect its vegetation development. Controlled stresses are applied during dike maintenance (e.g. mowing) to establish high coverage and a dense root system. Uncontrollable stresses during storm surges (e.g. flooding and wave loading) are likely to disturb this development. This species composition-based study analyses stress responses and their consequences for the ecological enhancement of grass covers in terms of dike safety. The responses of four different grass covers with increasing species numbers were investigated under three controlled experimental conditions, mimicking North Sea storm surge season in an outdoor wave-basin. We found significant differences in vegetation development indicating a shift of biomass from roots to shoots in response to flood stress. Resulting losses in the grass cover resistance were only minor for all grass covers. When additional wave stress was introduced no significant differences in root biomass were observed compared to the control group without flood or wave stress. The more herb and legume dominated grass covers seem to provide less erosion resistance for dike safety than the grass-dominated ones, as they develop the desired coverage slower and tend to have a lower shear strength. In conclusion, ecological enhancement by moderately increasing the number of species in the grass cover is possible without affecting dike safety. Evidence of disturbance in vegetation development highlight that thresholds and indicators for the early detection of stress responses need to be further investigated regarding the predicted intensification of uncontrolled environmental stressors. It is emphasised that long-term studies and adaptive monitoring are required to avoid unforeseen consequences by overloading the ability of grass covers to cope with and recover from coastal stressors and to find the optimal combination of ecological enhancement and dike safety.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Dike safety, Erosion, Flood stress, Root cohesion, Root density, Wave stress",
author = "Jochen Michalzik and Maike Paul and Torsten Schlurmann",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107488",
language = "English",
volume = "212",
journal = "Ecological engineering",
issn = "0925-8574",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response of grass covers for dikes to coastal stressors during establishment phase

AU - Michalzik, Jochen

AU - Paul, Maike

AU - Schlurmann, Torsten

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - Grass covers on dikes are subjected to a multitude of controlled and uncontrolled environmental stressors that can affect its vegetation development. Controlled stresses are applied during dike maintenance (e.g. mowing) to establish high coverage and a dense root system. Uncontrollable stresses during storm surges (e.g. flooding and wave loading) are likely to disturb this development. This species composition-based study analyses stress responses and their consequences for the ecological enhancement of grass covers in terms of dike safety. The responses of four different grass covers with increasing species numbers were investigated under three controlled experimental conditions, mimicking North Sea storm surge season in an outdoor wave-basin. We found significant differences in vegetation development indicating a shift of biomass from roots to shoots in response to flood stress. Resulting losses in the grass cover resistance were only minor for all grass covers. When additional wave stress was introduced no significant differences in root biomass were observed compared to the control group without flood or wave stress. The more herb and legume dominated grass covers seem to provide less erosion resistance for dike safety than the grass-dominated ones, as they develop the desired coverage slower and tend to have a lower shear strength. In conclusion, ecological enhancement by moderately increasing the number of species in the grass cover is possible without affecting dike safety. Evidence of disturbance in vegetation development highlight that thresholds and indicators for the early detection of stress responses need to be further investigated regarding the predicted intensification of uncontrolled environmental stressors. It is emphasised that long-term studies and adaptive monitoring are required to avoid unforeseen consequences by overloading the ability of grass covers to cope with and recover from coastal stressors and to find the optimal combination of ecological enhancement and dike safety.

AB - Grass covers on dikes are subjected to a multitude of controlled and uncontrolled environmental stressors that can affect its vegetation development. Controlled stresses are applied during dike maintenance (e.g. mowing) to establish high coverage and a dense root system. Uncontrollable stresses during storm surges (e.g. flooding and wave loading) are likely to disturb this development. This species composition-based study analyses stress responses and their consequences for the ecological enhancement of grass covers in terms of dike safety. The responses of four different grass covers with increasing species numbers were investigated under three controlled experimental conditions, mimicking North Sea storm surge season in an outdoor wave-basin. We found significant differences in vegetation development indicating a shift of biomass from roots to shoots in response to flood stress. Resulting losses in the grass cover resistance were only minor for all grass covers. When additional wave stress was introduced no significant differences in root biomass were observed compared to the control group without flood or wave stress. The more herb and legume dominated grass covers seem to provide less erosion resistance for dike safety than the grass-dominated ones, as they develop the desired coverage slower and tend to have a lower shear strength. In conclusion, ecological enhancement by moderately increasing the number of species in the grass cover is possible without affecting dike safety. Evidence of disturbance in vegetation development highlight that thresholds and indicators for the early detection of stress responses need to be further investigated regarding the predicted intensification of uncontrolled environmental stressors. It is emphasised that long-term studies and adaptive monitoring are required to avoid unforeseen consequences by overloading the ability of grass covers to cope with and recover from coastal stressors and to find the optimal combination of ecological enhancement and dike safety.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Dike safety

KW - Erosion

KW - Flood stress

KW - Root cohesion

KW - Root density

KW - Wave stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211717110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107488

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107488

M3 - Article

VL - 212

JO - Ecological engineering

JF - Ecological engineering

SN - 0925-8574

M1 - 107488

ER -

Von denselben Autoren