Replies

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Paul Hoyningen-Huene

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Zürich (UZH)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)907-928
Seitenumfang22
FachzeitschriftSynthese
Jahrgang196
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum1 März 2018
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 März 2019

Abstract

In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Replies. / Hoyningen-Huene, Paul.
in: Synthese, Jahrgang 196, Nr. 3, 15.03.2019, S. 907-928.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Hoyningen-Huene, P 2019, 'Replies', Synthese, Jg. 196, Nr. 3, S. 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2019). Replies. Synthese, 196(3), 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8
Hoyningen-Huene P. Replies. Synthese. 2019 Mär 15;196(3):907-928. Epub 2018 Mär 1. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. / Replies. in: Synthese. 2019 ; Jahrgang 196, Nr. 3. S. 907-928.
Download
@article{ff94da824b49415d9480a8256ccf8c94,
title = "Replies",
abstract = "In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).",
keywords = "Clinical medicine, Continuity thesis, Demarcation criterion, Science education, Scientific rationality, Socratic scientific realism, Systematicity theory",
author = "Paul Hoyningen-Huene",
note = "Funding information: I wish to thank the three editors both for organizing this special issue of Synthese and for very fruitful comments on an earlier version of this paper, including linguistic improvements by Hasok Chang.",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "907--928",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replies

AU - Hoyningen-Huene, Paul

N1 - Funding information: I wish to thank the three editors both for organizing this special issue of Synthese and for very fruitful comments on an earlier version of this paper, including linguistic improvements by Hasok Chang.

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

AB - In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book Systematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford University Press 2013).

KW - Clinical medicine

KW - Continuity thesis

KW - Demarcation criterion

KW - Science education

KW - Scientific rationality

KW - Socratic scientific realism

KW - Systematicity theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063059532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

DO - 10.1007/s11229-018-1741-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063059532

VL - 196

SP - 907

EP - 928

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 3

ER -