Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 5571-5594 |
| Seitenumfang | 24 |
| Fachzeitschrift | SCIENTOMETRICS |
| Jahrgang | 128 |
| Ausgabenummer | 10 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 23 Aug. 2023 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Okt. 2023 |
Abstract
We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Informatik (insg.)
- Angewandte Informatik
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: SCIENTOMETRICS, Jahrgang 128, Nr. 10, 10.2023, S. 5571-5594.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness
T2 - an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany
AU - Howoldt, David
AU - Kroll, Henning
AU - Neuhäusler, Peter
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.
AB - We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.
KW - Altmetrics
KW - Citation impact
KW - LinkedIn
KW - Research dissemination
KW - Twitter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168623496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y
DO - 10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168623496
VL - 128
SP - 5571
EP - 5594
JO - SCIENTOMETRICS
JF - SCIENTOMETRICS
SN - 0138-9130
IS - 10
ER -