"Regional Governance" in England

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung gGmbH (ILS)
  • Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungRegional Governance in England
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)12-20
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftGeographische Rundschau
Jahrgang58
Ausgabenummer5
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2006
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Devolution in England has been high on New Labour's political agenda ever since the 1997 Labour Party Manifesto (the year of the landslide victory in the General Election). It was conceived of as a means to improve the overall functioning of public-sector activities on the regional level and as a way of making that involvement more democratically accountable. After the successful first "wave" of devolution to the Celtic Fringe, the North-East was chosen as the first region in England where a referendum would be held in order to fathom public support for elected Regional Assemblies and in order to subsequently establish such an Assembly, depending on the outcome of the referendum. The North East suffers particularly under recent economic restructuring with a decline in its traditional industries, a stagnant population growth and an equally stagnant gross national product. As it turned out, a vast majority (80 %) of the voters was against the proposal. The failure of the referendum can be seen as an indication of the many-faceted problems which the process of devolution in England is confronted with. However, this does not mean that issues of governance reform on the regional level in England are off the agenda now. It does send out the clear message, though, that a technocratically conceived form of decentralisation from "above" does not find sufficient public support.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

"Regional Governance" in England. / Danielzyk, Rainer; Wood, Gerald.
in: Geographische Rundschau, Jahrgang 58, Nr. 5, 05.2006, S. 12-20.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Danielzyk, R & Wood, G 2006, '"Regional Governance" in England', Geographische Rundschau, Jg. 58, Nr. 5, S. 12-20.
Danielzyk, R., & Wood, G. (2006). "Regional Governance" in England. Geographische Rundschau, 58(5), 12-20.
Danielzyk R, Wood G. "Regional Governance" in England. Geographische Rundschau. 2006 Mai;58(5):12-20.
Danielzyk, Rainer ; Wood, Gerald. / "Regional Governance" in England. in: Geographische Rundschau. 2006 ; Jahrgang 58, Nr. 5. S. 12-20.
Download
@article{1cb0110dabfa43dfbae8bca07258b788,
title = "{"}Regional Governance{"} in England",
abstract = "Devolution in England has been high on New Labour's political agenda ever since the 1997 Labour Party Manifesto (the year of the landslide victory in the General Election). It was conceived of as a means to improve the overall functioning of public-sector activities on the regional level and as a way of making that involvement more democratically accountable. After the successful first {"}wave{"} of devolution to the Celtic Fringe, the North-East was chosen as the first region in England where a referendum would be held in order to fathom public support for elected Regional Assemblies and in order to subsequently establish such an Assembly, depending on the outcome of the referendum. The North East suffers particularly under recent economic restructuring with a decline in its traditional industries, a stagnant population growth and an equally stagnant gross national product. As it turned out, a vast majority (80 %) of the voters was against the proposal. The failure of the referendum can be seen as an indication of the many-faceted problems which the process of devolution in England is confronted with. However, this does not mean that issues of governance reform on the regional level in England are off the agenda now. It does send out the clear message, though, that a technocratically conceived form of decentralisation from {"}above{"} does not find sufficient public support.",
author = "Rainer Danielzyk and Gerald Wood",
year = "2006",
month = may,
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "58",
pages = "12--20",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Regional Governance" in England

AU - Danielzyk, Rainer

AU - Wood, Gerald

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Devolution in England has been high on New Labour's political agenda ever since the 1997 Labour Party Manifesto (the year of the landslide victory in the General Election). It was conceived of as a means to improve the overall functioning of public-sector activities on the regional level and as a way of making that involvement more democratically accountable. After the successful first "wave" of devolution to the Celtic Fringe, the North-East was chosen as the first region in England where a referendum would be held in order to fathom public support for elected Regional Assemblies and in order to subsequently establish such an Assembly, depending on the outcome of the referendum. The North East suffers particularly under recent economic restructuring with a decline in its traditional industries, a stagnant population growth and an equally stagnant gross national product. As it turned out, a vast majority (80 %) of the voters was against the proposal. The failure of the referendum can be seen as an indication of the many-faceted problems which the process of devolution in England is confronted with. However, this does not mean that issues of governance reform on the regional level in England are off the agenda now. It does send out the clear message, though, that a technocratically conceived form of decentralisation from "above" does not find sufficient public support.

AB - Devolution in England has been high on New Labour's political agenda ever since the 1997 Labour Party Manifesto (the year of the landslide victory in the General Election). It was conceived of as a means to improve the overall functioning of public-sector activities on the regional level and as a way of making that involvement more democratically accountable. After the successful first "wave" of devolution to the Celtic Fringe, the North-East was chosen as the first region in England where a referendum would be held in order to fathom public support for elected Regional Assemblies and in order to subsequently establish such an Assembly, depending on the outcome of the referendum. The North East suffers particularly under recent economic restructuring with a decline in its traditional industries, a stagnant population growth and an equally stagnant gross national product. As it turned out, a vast majority (80 %) of the voters was against the proposal. The failure of the referendum can be seen as an indication of the many-faceted problems which the process of devolution in England is confronted with. However, this does not mean that issues of governance reform on the regional level in England are off the agenda now. It does send out the clear message, though, that a technocratically conceived form of decentralisation from "above" does not find sufficient public support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646485370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:33646485370

VL - 58

SP - 12

EP - 20

JO - Geographische Rundschau

JF - Geographische Rundschau

SN - 0016-7460

IS - 5

ER -

Von denselben Autoren