Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung

Autoren

  • Eick von Ruschkowski
  • Robert Burns
  • Arne Arnberger
  • David Smaldone
  • Jessica Meybin

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)95-114
FachzeitschriftJournal of Park and Recreation Administration
Jahrgang31
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2013

Abstract

Nature-based recreational activities continue to be a management challenge in many parks and protected areas worldwide. Although this challenge is widely recognized within the academic community, the transfer of research into daily management practice is at different levels among countries. This research was designed to focus on the values of park managers that influence the prioritization of management strategies and actions in a crosscultural context. This study surveyed 28 park and protected area managers responsible for recreation planning and management in Austria, Germany and the United States using a Delphi study. The objective was to identify differences and similarities in their values and daily management practices and priorities. Differences in the value systems were identified. The planning approaches in the three countries varied largely, with the European countries putting an emphasis on mitigating the human impacts on natural resources caused by recreational activities; whereas in the United States, social issues such as carrying capacity, visitor satisfaction and crowding seem to be dominant in the field of recreation management. The differences identified can help planners and managers in the three countries to improve their management tools and techniques in order to address the complex challenge of recreation management, as well as for a better integration of ecological and social issues.

Zitieren

Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States. / von Ruschkowski, Eick; Burns, Robert; Arnberger, Arne et al.
in: Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 2, 2013, S. 95-114.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung

von Ruschkowski, E, Burns, R, Arnberger, A, Smaldone, D & Meybin, J 2013, 'Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States', Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, Jg. 31, Nr. 2, S. 95-114. <https://js.sagamorepub.com/index.php/jpra/article/view/3888>
von Ruschkowski, E., Burns, R., Arnberger, A., Smaldone, D., & Meybin, J. (2013). Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 31(2), 95-114. https://js.sagamorepub.com/index.php/jpra/article/view/3888
von Ruschkowski E, Burns R, Arnberger A, Smaldone D, Meybin J. Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 2013;31(2):95-114.
von Ruschkowski, Eick ; Burns, Robert ; Arnberger, Arne et al. / Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas : A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States. in: Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 2013 ; Jahrgang 31, Nr. 2. S. 95-114.
Download
@article{a53026ef387346a1b9ea5eccfa7455f7,
title = "Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States",
abstract = "Nature-based recreational activities continue to be a management challenge in many parks and protected areas worldwide. Although this challenge is widely recognized within the academic community, the transfer of research into daily management practice is at different levels among countries. This research was designed to focus on the values of park managers that influence the prioritization of management strategies and actions in a crosscultural context. This study surveyed 28 park and protected area managers responsible for recreation planning and management in Austria, Germany and the United States using a Delphi study. The objective was to identify differences and similarities in their values and daily management practices and priorities. Differences in the value systems were identified. The planning approaches in the three countries varied largely, with the European countries putting an emphasis on mitigating the human impacts on natural resources caused by recreational activities; whereas in the United States, social issues such as carrying capacity, visitor satisfaction and crowding seem to be dominant in the field of recreation management. The differences identified can help planners and managers in the three countries to improve their management tools and techniques in order to address the complex challenge of recreation management, as well as for a better integration of ecological and social issues. ",
author = "{von Ruschkowski}, Eick and Robert Burns and Arne Arnberger and David Smaldone and Jessica Meybin",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "95--114",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recreation Management in Parks and Protected Areas

T2 - A Comparative Study of Resource Managers Perceptions in Austria, Germany, and the United States

AU - von Ruschkowski, Eick

AU - Burns, Robert

AU - Arnberger, Arne

AU - Smaldone, David

AU - Meybin, Jessica

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Nature-based recreational activities continue to be a management challenge in many parks and protected areas worldwide. Although this challenge is widely recognized within the academic community, the transfer of research into daily management practice is at different levels among countries. This research was designed to focus on the values of park managers that influence the prioritization of management strategies and actions in a crosscultural context. This study surveyed 28 park and protected area managers responsible for recreation planning and management in Austria, Germany and the United States using a Delphi study. The objective was to identify differences and similarities in their values and daily management practices and priorities. Differences in the value systems were identified. The planning approaches in the three countries varied largely, with the European countries putting an emphasis on mitigating the human impacts on natural resources caused by recreational activities; whereas in the United States, social issues such as carrying capacity, visitor satisfaction and crowding seem to be dominant in the field of recreation management. The differences identified can help planners and managers in the three countries to improve their management tools and techniques in order to address the complex challenge of recreation management, as well as for a better integration of ecological and social issues.

AB - Nature-based recreational activities continue to be a management challenge in many parks and protected areas worldwide. Although this challenge is widely recognized within the academic community, the transfer of research into daily management practice is at different levels among countries. This research was designed to focus on the values of park managers that influence the prioritization of management strategies and actions in a crosscultural context. This study surveyed 28 park and protected area managers responsible for recreation planning and management in Austria, Germany and the United States using a Delphi study. The objective was to identify differences and similarities in their values and daily management practices and priorities. Differences in the value systems were identified. The planning approaches in the three countries varied largely, with the European countries putting an emphasis on mitigating the human impacts on natural resources caused by recreational activities; whereas in the United States, social issues such as carrying capacity, visitor satisfaction and crowding seem to be dominant in the field of recreation management. The differences identified can help planners and managers in the three countries to improve their management tools and techniques in order to address the complex challenge of recreation management, as well as for a better integration of ecological and social issues.

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 95

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Park and Recreation Administration

JF - Journal of Park and Recreation Administration

IS - 2

ER -