PV module current gains due to structured backsheets

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Malte R. Vogt
  • Hendrik Holst
  • Henning Schulte-Huxel
  • Susanne Blankemeyer
  • Robert Witteck
  • Patrice Bujard
  • Jan Bernd Kues
  • Carsten Schinke
  • Karsten Bothe
  • Marc Köntges
  • Rolf Brendel

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Institut für Solarenergieforschung GmbH (ISFH)
  • BASF SE
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)495-503
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftEnergy Procedia
Jahrgang124
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 21 Sept. 2017
Veranstaltung7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017 - Freiburg, Deutschland
Dauer: 3 Apr. 20175 Apr. 2017

Abstract

We evaluate the optical performance of PV modules with respect to an increase in short circuit current density. Our evaluation is based on the combination of ray tracing simulations and measurements on test modules with four types of backsheets: Two of them are structured, the third is white and diffusively reflecting and the fourth reflects no light. Under normal incidence, structured backsheets reflect incoming light at an angle that causes total internal reflection at the glass/air interface, which guides the light to the solar cell surface. Three different irradiance conditions are studied: a) standard testing conditions (STC) with light incident perpendicular to the module surface, b) variation in the angle of incidence and c) light source with mean annual distribution of angles of incidence. Using the measured refractive index data in ray tracing simulations we find a short circuit current density (Jsc) gain of up to 0.9 mA/cm2 (2.3%) for monofacial cells and a structured backsheet, when compared to a white backsheet with diffuse reflection. For bifacial cells we calculate an even larger Jsc increase of 1.4 mA/cm2 (3.6%). The Jsc increase is larger for bifacial cells, since some light is transmitted through the cells and thus more light interacts with the backsheet. Our optical loss analysis reveals the best performance in STC for edge-aligned Ag grooves. This structure reduces absorption losses from 1.8 mA/cm2 to 0.3 mA/cm and reflection losses from 0.7 mA/cm to 0 mA/cm. This trend also holds under various angles of incidence as confirmed consistently by Jsc measurements and ray racing simulations. Simulations using an annual light source emitting a mean annual distribution of angles of incidence reveal grooves in both orientations edge alignment and east-west alignment achieve similar current gains of up to 1.5% for mono- and of 2.5% for bifacial cells compared to modules with white back sheets. This indicates that for modules with light guiding structures such as these backsheets optimization for STC differs from optimization for annul yield.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

PV module current gains due to structured backsheets. / Vogt, Malte R.; Holst, Hendrik; Schulte-Huxel, Henning et al.
in: Energy Procedia, Jahrgang 124, 21.09.2017, S. 495-503.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Vogt, MR, Holst, H, Schulte-Huxel, H, Blankemeyer, S, Witteck, R, Bujard, P, Kues, JB, Schinke, C, Bothe, K, Köntges, M & Brendel, R 2017, 'PV module current gains due to structured backsheets', Energy Procedia, Jg. 124, S. 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286
Vogt, M. R., Holst, H., Schulte-Huxel, H., Blankemeyer, S., Witteck, R., Bujard, P., Kues, J. B., Schinke, C., Bothe, K., Köntges, M., & Brendel, R. (2017). PV module current gains due to structured backsheets. Energy Procedia, 124, 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286
Vogt MR, Holst H, Schulte-Huxel H, Blankemeyer S, Witteck R, Bujard P et al. PV module current gains due to structured backsheets. Energy Procedia. 2017 Sep 21;124:495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286
Vogt, Malte R. ; Holst, Hendrik ; Schulte-Huxel, Henning et al. / PV module current gains due to structured backsheets. in: Energy Procedia. 2017 ; Jahrgang 124. S. 495-503.
Download
@article{54b925c6343541f5bb9ddf7094861f75,
title = "PV module current gains due to structured backsheets",
abstract = "We evaluate the optical performance of PV modules with respect to an increase in short circuit current density. Our evaluation is based on the combination of ray tracing simulations and measurements on test modules with four types of backsheets: Two of them are structured, the third is white and diffusively reflecting and the fourth reflects no light. Under normal incidence, structured backsheets reflect incoming light at an angle that causes total internal reflection at the glass/air interface, which guides the light to the solar cell surface. Three different irradiance conditions are studied: a) standard testing conditions (STC) with light incident perpendicular to the module surface, b) variation in the angle of incidence and c) light source with mean annual distribution of angles of incidence. Using the measured refractive index data in ray tracing simulations we find a short circuit current density (Jsc) gain of up to 0.9 mA/cm2 (2.3%) for monofacial cells and a structured backsheet, when compared to a white backsheet with diffuse reflection. For bifacial cells we calculate an even larger Jsc increase of 1.4 mA/cm2 (3.6%). The Jsc increase is larger for bifacial cells, since some light is transmitted through the cells and thus more light interacts with the backsheet. Our optical loss analysis reveals the best performance in STC for edge-aligned Ag grooves. This structure reduces absorption losses from 1.8 mA/cm2 to 0.3 mA/cm and reflection losses from 0.7 mA/cm to 0 mA/cm. This trend also holds under various angles of incidence as confirmed consistently by Jsc measurements and ray racing simulations. Simulations using an annual light source emitting a mean annual distribution of angles of incidence reveal grooves in both orientations edge alignment and east-west alignment achieve similar current gains of up to 1.5% for mono- and of 2.5% for bifacial cells compared to modules with white back sheets. This indicates that for modules with light guiding structures such as these backsheets optimization for STC differs from optimization for annul yield.",
keywords = "Backsheet, bifacial cells, cell spacing area, light harvesting, light recovery probability, optical loss analysis, PV modules",
author = "Vogt, {Malte R.} and Hendrik Holst and Henning Schulte-Huxel and Susanne Blankemeyer and Robert Witteck and Patrice Bujard and Kues, {Jan Bernd} and Carsten Schinke and Karsten Bothe and Marc K{\"o}ntges and Rolf Brendel",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy through the “PERC2Module” project under Contract 0325641. We would also like to thank Sarah Sp{\"a}tlich, Ulrike Sonntag, Till Brendem{\"u}hl for the cell production. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017 ; Conference date: 03-04-2017 Through 05-04-2017",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "495--503",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - PV module current gains due to structured backsheets

AU - Vogt, Malte R.

AU - Holst, Hendrik

AU - Schulte-Huxel, Henning

AU - Blankemeyer, Susanne

AU - Witteck, Robert

AU - Bujard, Patrice

AU - Kues, Jan Bernd

AU - Schinke, Carsten

AU - Bothe, Karsten

AU - Köntges, Marc

AU - Brendel, Rolf

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy through the “PERC2Module” project under Contract 0325641. We would also like to thank Sarah Spätlich, Ulrike Sonntag, Till Brendemühl for the cell production. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/9/21

Y1 - 2017/9/21

N2 - We evaluate the optical performance of PV modules with respect to an increase in short circuit current density. Our evaluation is based on the combination of ray tracing simulations and measurements on test modules with four types of backsheets: Two of them are structured, the third is white and diffusively reflecting and the fourth reflects no light. Under normal incidence, structured backsheets reflect incoming light at an angle that causes total internal reflection at the glass/air interface, which guides the light to the solar cell surface. Three different irradiance conditions are studied: a) standard testing conditions (STC) with light incident perpendicular to the module surface, b) variation in the angle of incidence and c) light source with mean annual distribution of angles of incidence. Using the measured refractive index data in ray tracing simulations we find a short circuit current density (Jsc) gain of up to 0.9 mA/cm2 (2.3%) for monofacial cells and a structured backsheet, when compared to a white backsheet with diffuse reflection. For bifacial cells we calculate an even larger Jsc increase of 1.4 mA/cm2 (3.6%). The Jsc increase is larger for bifacial cells, since some light is transmitted through the cells and thus more light interacts with the backsheet. Our optical loss analysis reveals the best performance in STC for edge-aligned Ag grooves. This structure reduces absorption losses from 1.8 mA/cm2 to 0.3 mA/cm and reflection losses from 0.7 mA/cm to 0 mA/cm. This trend also holds under various angles of incidence as confirmed consistently by Jsc measurements and ray racing simulations. Simulations using an annual light source emitting a mean annual distribution of angles of incidence reveal grooves in both orientations edge alignment and east-west alignment achieve similar current gains of up to 1.5% for mono- and of 2.5% for bifacial cells compared to modules with white back sheets. This indicates that for modules with light guiding structures such as these backsheets optimization for STC differs from optimization for annul yield.

AB - We evaluate the optical performance of PV modules with respect to an increase in short circuit current density. Our evaluation is based on the combination of ray tracing simulations and measurements on test modules with four types of backsheets: Two of them are structured, the third is white and diffusively reflecting and the fourth reflects no light. Under normal incidence, structured backsheets reflect incoming light at an angle that causes total internal reflection at the glass/air interface, which guides the light to the solar cell surface. Three different irradiance conditions are studied: a) standard testing conditions (STC) with light incident perpendicular to the module surface, b) variation in the angle of incidence and c) light source with mean annual distribution of angles of incidence. Using the measured refractive index data in ray tracing simulations we find a short circuit current density (Jsc) gain of up to 0.9 mA/cm2 (2.3%) for monofacial cells and a structured backsheet, when compared to a white backsheet with diffuse reflection. For bifacial cells we calculate an even larger Jsc increase of 1.4 mA/cm2 (3.6%). The Jsc increase is larger for bifacial cells, since some light is transmitted through the cells and thus more light interacts with the backsheet. Our optical loss analysis reveals the best performance in STC for edge-aligned Ag grooves. This structure reduces absorption losses from 1.8 mA/cm2 to 0.3 mA/cm and reflection losses from 0.7 mA/cm to 0 mA/cm. This trend also holds under various angles of incidence as confirmed consistently by Jsc measurements and ray racing simulations. Simulations using an annual light source emitting a mean annual distribution of angles of incidence reveal grooves in both orientations edge alignment and east-west alignment achieve similar current gains of up to 1.5% for mono- and of 2.5% for bifacial cells compared to modules with white back sheets. This indicates that for modules with light guiding structures such as these backsheets optimization for STC differs from optimization for annul yield.

KW - Backsheet

KW - bifacial cells

KW - cell spacing area

KW - light harvesting

KW - light recovery probability

KW - optical loss analysis

KW - PV modules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031937543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85031937543

VL - 124

SP - 495

EP - 503

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

T2 - 7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017

Y2 - 3 April 2017 through 5 April 2017

ER -