Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • Universität zu Köln
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
FachzeitschriftSemantics and Pragmatics
Jahrgang10
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 20 Dez. 2017
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

Zitieren

Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. / Claus, Berry; Meijer, A. Marlijn ; Repp, Sophie et al.
in: Semantics and Pragmatics, Jahrgang 10, 20.12.2017.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Claus B, Meijer AM, Repp S, Krifka M. Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. Semantics and Pragmatics. 2017 Dez 20;10. doi: 10.3765/sp.10.19
Claus, Berry ; Meijer, A. Marlijn ; Repp, Sophie et al. / Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. in: Semantics and Pragmatics. 2017 ; Jahrgang 10.
Download
@article{6d6110b78b9a42c89bae3d51a63d4122,
title = "Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system",
abstract = "This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.",
author = "Berry Claus and Meijer, {A. Marlijn} and Sophie Repp and Manfred Krifka",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "20",
doi = "10.3765/sp.10.19",
language = "English",
volume = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

AU - Claus, Berry

AU - Meijer, A. Marlijn

AU - Repp, Sophie

AU - Krifka, Manfred

PY - 2017/12/20

Y1 - 2017/12/20

N2 - This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

AB - This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.19

U2 - 10.3765/sp.10.19

DO - 10.3765/sp.10.19

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Semantics and Pragmatics

JF - Semantics and Pragmatics

SN - 1937-8912

ER -

Von denselben Autoren